340
submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 143 points 3 months ago

This guy really thinks he's never gonna die. I'll be surprised if he survives this upcoming term, and not even from a Minecraft related cause, just poor health.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

What is a "Minecraft related cause?"

[-] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

When you're talking about actionable threats, I.E. real world violence, but want to appear only hypothetical, the meme is, "I'd kill X in Minecraft.".

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

Creepers in the White House, it's a known problem in the dark corners of the building. Half of what the secret service does in the morning is clear the building of creepers that spawned over night when no one was around to block hostile mob spawns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Death by Ender Dragon.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

A lot of dumb people thought they could talk about killing politicians on the Internet if they ended their message with "in Minecraft" so they could claim they were just taking about a game. At least one of them has already been arrested proving their plan doesn't actually provide any defense.

So a Minecraft cause would be someone plotting (and then presumably actually) killing them.

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 months ago

He got the wrong ideas from all these god emporer memes back in the day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] g0nz0li0@lemmy.world 117 points 3 months ago

“He jokes all the time,” said Rep. Eli Crane, R-Ariz., who was in the room at the time. “I think it's one of the problems with politics is you can't even tell a joke without being excoriated.”

Definitely, that's the problem in politics. Ffs.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

"excoriated"

That's certainly a $10 word for a Republican.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I think you should be able to DISTINGUISH it's a joke. Also, as anyone who does politics will tell you, ANYTHING that comes out of your mouth into any form of microphone can and should be expected to be used against you, and should be expected to be believed.

"Joking" in politics should've died with Reagan's press sec laughing about gay men dying of AIDS.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Any time he says anything that gets significant negative pushback, it is dismissed as a joke.

Same thing with the rest of them. It's always a joke unless you agree with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 71 points 3 months ago

Let's hope the next 4 years are tough on the felon, he may not even make it to 2028 🤞🏼

[-] Poach@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

I'm not convinced Vance or Johnson is any better than the orange baffoon .

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

They would be worse. A dumb Nazi is preferable to a smart Nazi.

[-] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago

Upside is the cult of personality is attached to Trump, and no one else has been able to pull it off him. Trump is only effective because somehow, for some insane reason, he, personally, has a lot of devoted followers.

[-] AAA@feddit.org 9 points 3 months ago

The cult is attached to Trump, yes. But when he dies his followers won't suddenly wake up from their madness and flock behind a "normal candidate".

They will still go for the crazy ones who act and talk the way Trump did. There may not be a second Trump, but they are lost nevertheless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] babybus@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yep. When a dictator dies, it doesn't necessarily lead to democracy and prosperity because the system is broken, and the next person simply assumes the absolute power.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 15 points 3 months ago

Will the MAGAs back Vance without Trump?

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

He doesn't have "D" next to his name and has shown no indication of rationality, so yes.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Some will, some won't. Cults of personality don't tend to fare well without their personality, and Vance has all the charisma of a used tissue, so it'll come down to how skillfully he can navigate things.

Remember, a LOT of right-wing Christians think Trump is either a prophet, an agent of God, or (in some cases) literally Christ Himself. That's an awful hard act to follow when your prophet doesn't get taken up to heaven in a fiery chariot, or your Messiah doesn't rise again after 3 days.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] astanix@lemmy.world 60 points 3 months ago

He won't need to run. He already said he will be a dictator. Dictators don't need elections.

This is what we get.

Revolution is the answer. Killing the rich.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 months ago
[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

We are in the bad timeline friend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] valaramech@fedia.io 39 points 3 months ago

The 22nd amendment to the US Constitution bars Trump as a viable candidate for the Office of the President. It would require an additional amendment to be possible and there's no way that 3/4ths of all US states will agree to that shit.

The only potential loophole that I can discern is that there's no clear consensus on if Trump would be allowed to run as Vice-President on someone else's ticket. If he can, then, theoretically, he could run for VP and then have the elected President immediately resign, making him the President again.

[-] beliquititious 40 points 3 months ago

...there's no way that 3/4ths of all US states will agree to that shit.

We've had an extraordinary number of "there's no way that..." moments in the past decade most of which have been connected to Trump, why tempt fate like that? The 2024 election map has more than the 38 red states needed to ratify a constitutional amendment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] evidences@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

So right at the end of the 12th amendment there's this line.

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

So as of his presidential win this election he's ineligible to be vice president.

[-] lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago

The Supreme Court will just "interpret" that away.

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

With as much as this Supreme Court is riding Trump's dick I wouldn't put it past them to rule in his favor if this made it to them.

[-] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago

The 22a says he can't be elected. But that doesn't make him ineligible to serve. The wording presents a loophole that our highly partisan Supreme Court could drive a truck through.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] superkret@feddit.org 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Or he's gonna wipe his ass with the Constitution in an X live stream and declare Jan 6 "National Patriots Day" while Fox commentators claim he's joking.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago

The 22nd amendment to the US Constitution bars Trump as a viable candidate for the Office of the President. It would require an additional amendment to be possible and there’s no way that 3/4ths of all US states will agree to that shit.

I no longer believe the process and laws of our government will apply to this administration. We'll see.

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 months ago

If they do it, it will be by suspending the constitution entirely. Don't need any states for that.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

The Putin Ploy

[-] dmajorduckie 6 points 3 months ago

The 14th amendment didn't stop him from running again, I fail to see what the 22nd amendment would do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 3 months ago
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

So overturn or amend? Like I’m kinda surprised he’s even taking the constitution into consideration. Like he’s weird, he doesn’t seem to want to acknowledge that once he’s done all he says he wants to do the United States of America will no longer exist. Caesar could not cross the rubicon and rule the republic, he could only control Rome. Nor could Napoleon take full control of the French Republic. Republics are finicky things like that, a dictator can only ever hold their land, not the thing itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago

I mean, we might as well just go all in. It seems like most everyone is running headlong into apocalypse anyway.

I just don't have the capacity for this. Ugh.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 months ago

If you ask Trump, this IS his third term, so no, he's not joking.

[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Well, with having control of literally every aspect of the government they actually could change this country for the worse. However, it's theoretically possible that some of them grow a spine.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

More likely is they tie themselves into a giant king rat of greed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] root_beer@midwest.social 16 points 3 months ago

Fuck it, nothing matters anymore; they’ll do “something” and we’ll vote him in again

Who cares whether he’ll be 82 by then, age clearly wasn’t the issue this time

[-] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

It's going to be hard to campaign from a New York state jail cell for the next 4 years. The DOJ may have rules about a sitting president but he was neither when he committed the crimes he has already been convicted of in NY state court.

[-] whyalone@lemm.ee 62 points 3 months ago

He will never go to jail, he will never suffer any consequences of his past and future actions. Unfortunately it is what it is.

[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

In the veiled depths of cosmic night, beyond the grasp of mortal understanding, there lurks an abomination known as D'ohl-Nald'trump, Evader of Consequence, Weaver of Lies. Ancient as the first whispers of deceit, this blasphemous entity shambles through the mortal realm in garish splendor, clad in illusions spun of its own warped grandeur. Its voice, a booming incantation laced with half-truths and hollow promises, spills forth with the power to sway the minds of even the stout-hearted, plunging them into delirium where reason itself dissolves. Those who fall under its thrall are left in a fog of bewildered amnesia, helpless to recall its transgressions, let alone question its motives.

For D'ohl-Nald'trump wields a dreadful gift—an eldritch glamour that cloaks it in perpetual exoneration, a power so unnatural that no mortal cage may hold it, no law may bind it. Even those who glimpse its deceit find themselves ensnared in its web of forgetfulness, powerless to hold its ever-shifting form to account. And so, the Weaver of Lies drifts through aeons untouched, a nightmare that evades justice itself, as if consequence were but a faint myth of a distant, naïve cosmos.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
340 points (100.0% liked)

News

25105 readers
3194 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS