713
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago

I just can't grasp how you could say shit like this and not immediately realize you are a bad person.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 year ago

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

They believe they are the good guys.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's either kids who are 14yo or adult babies with the mind of a 6yo.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago
[-] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is correct but it's delusional to think saying this to them would work. They need to be deeply afraid to express their opinions. They're dug in and if this year taught us anything it's that they aren't convincible. The only realistic path forward is to make them fearful. Ridicule isn't enough. They need to be afraid if they voice their opinions. Afraid for their reputations, afraid for their careers, and afraid for their very lives. If they aren't afraid at that level then we'll only sink farther. Them not getting laid isn't nearly enough. They should live terrified that people will find out who they really are, and they must be afraid at the highest level.

EDIT: Reading this back I realize how this sounds, I'm NOT saying that anyone should take that kind of action, but when Sherman matched to the sea, that kind of fear was the goal and it briefly worked. Likewise after the civil rights movement. It's nothing more than the tolerance paradox.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 28 points 1 year ago
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Yeah, right-wing cretins have no shame in the sense of being able to be embarrassed by logical conclusions or contradictions. This comic is really only meant (or at least shared by me) as a kind of commiseration between non-fascists.

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

So accurate!

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 19 points 1 year ago

Arm yourself women. Be ready to kill to protect yourselves!

[-] Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online 14 points 1 year ago

I'm already armed and thanks to only coming out about 6 years ago I was taught how to shoot as part of a "father-son bonding activity" So thanks dad, you may be a transphobic ass but you still taught me how to shoot, and I'm grateful for that, even though you regret it.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

We're going to need an underground railroad for women in this situation. Otherwise, they are going to start executing women who have killed in the name of self-defense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

So sad the younger generation had to be exposed to this type of rhetoric. When I first read the slogan that's exactly what I thought.. There are a complete lack of social skills Make them parrot some losers slogan.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

This slogan sounds so much like a parody on Rightist ideology that despite all evidence I'm still struggling to believe it's an actual Rightist slogan

[-] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 3 points 1 year ago

Since 2020, they've gone mask off.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So that whole anti-masking thing was also metaphoric?

[-] vordalack@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Imagine voting for an orange man because you can't get laid and can't keep a wife. Being a republican man means being unable to find a wife, have sex, have kids, have a relationship, and being unfathomably gullible.

The funny part is Trump is going to import the very people that make white republican men uncomfortable. Interracial relationships are about to explode and white incels are going to lose their minds.

Vance isn't getting you an Indian wife and Trump isn't making anime real.

[-] savx@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Nah, they dont give a shit about logic, they only know "own the libs!".

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Just call them weird. That'll work, right?

Right?

[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Harris campaign dropped that after the first month, even though it seemed to be the only thing that got under Trump and Vance's skin.

They got Geoff Garin, former Clinton campaign co-chief strategist, who told them to drop "We're not going back" - not forward looking enough (they didn't) and drop "weird" - too negative (they did).

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Wow that makes so much sense and now I know who to be mad at. Kamala had so much steam until shortly after announcing Walz and then I just felt like they really fell into the background. And trump is never truly in jist the background, he makes the media too much money

[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I think there's plenty of people to be mad at, more than enough blame to go around.

Biden could have chosen to be the transitionary president he "signaled" that he'd be by stepping out of the race 6-12 months earlier, and allowing for a full primary season for democrats to rally around a candidate and a platform.

The Harris campaign could have rejected the failed 2016 strategy of courting moderate republican at the expense of blue collar democrats, rather than champion the Cheney family endorsement, in spite internal protests.

I'm not willing to scapegoat just one person for this loss, this was the whole damn team. The DNC needs to realize that people vote when they're excited to vote. That whether they're door knocking or just talking to their friends, the base is going to get those low propensity voters out if they're bragging about some great thing democrats will do. And it's a lot easier when that thing is healthcare or amnesty (Obama), rather than small business tax cuts and a republican bill on the border.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

The 4B movement is going to rise until the problem gets resolved.

And I am all for it. You go queens!

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I imagine her grabbing him by the balls in the 4th panel.

Maybe giving it a little twist for good measure.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And then he calls the cops because he is a pussy

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And yet y'all can't say "cock?"

[-] SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, that astrix is obscuring a much fouler word, but you are a bit too young to learn it yet. We will tell you when you're older.

edit: tough crowd

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If only that meme were true.

[-] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

If that boy could understand 3-syllable words he'd be very upset

[-] whygohomie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We knew that in 2016, and yet people still thought "Sign me up" or "I'll stay at home on election day" were likely to work out well for them.

FAFO it is. Ugh.

[-] style99@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Shouldn't that magat be wearing a heavily-stained tank top?

In the next panel, the guy fires back: "Get back to the kitchen, cuz! Or me and the boys are gonna round up the dogs and take you huntin!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

For sure we need to keep bagging on these shitty dudes that think they're better than any other gender, but don't forget to also take shots at the women that voted for these policies as well. Equal shaming for everyone.

[-] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what "Your Body, My Choice" is supposed to mean.

Trying to read this in as good of faith as possible (so as to better understand what they think they're saying), it seems like they're saying "I see your body is unattractive and wouldnt try to get with you anyway", but thats obviously not something you'd say to another person? Unless, like the woman was coming on to the man? I guess?

Am i totally missing the mark on the intent / would there be another meaning for this to actually be said to another person?

[-] KamikazeRusher@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Some articles may help. The fact that Nick Fuentes posted it should indicate that nothing good is meant by it

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

He's been doxxed, if you really wanna tell him to his face.

[-] KamikazeRusher@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I saw a post about it, and while I may have high disdain towards him and what he does I wouldn’t spread his information nor act on it. Doxxing isn’t something I agree with. I wouldn’t want someone I don’t know who disagrees with my opinions to visit my house. Disagree, de-platform, and de-associate.

[-] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

Wow. Just wow.

Part of me wants to be like "Nick Fuentes isn't representative of the cultural zeitgeist" (I - a het white guy - have heard the name but know nothing about the guy)......but wow. I believe the technical term is that thats "pretty fucked up".

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
713 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9906 readers
2377 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS