93
submitted 4 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

A New York judge dismissed Mayor Eric Adams’ lawsuit aimed at blocking Texas from sending migrants to NYC via charter buses, ruling that an 1817 anti-pauper law invoked by Adams was unconstitutional.

The court affirmed migrants’ right to interstate travel, rejecting efforts to screen passengers based on economic status.

Texas began bussing migrants to cities like NYC in 2022, escalating tensions over federal immigration policy.

Although NYC claimed the lawsuit reduced bus arrivals, officials are exploring further legal actions to address the financial strain on city resources.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 53 points 4 days ago

The court affirmed migrants’ right to interstate travel,

Fun fact: this is an unenumerated right of the people that courts have consistently recognized. The tenth amendment promises that the people retain their natural rights, even if they're not explicitly listed in the Constitution.

This is exactly the same category as the right to privacy that was postulated in Roe v. Wade and overturned in Dobbs.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Psst: unenumerated rights is the Ninth Amendment. Tenth is "StaTeS RIgHts".

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Fine.

Although the tenth does end with

...are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 30 points 4 days ago

Justice Mary Rosado said in a sternly worded decision that the law is unconstitutional for several reasons. For one, she wrote, states are not permitted to regulate the interstate transportation of people based on their economic status. The statute also “violates a fundamental right — the right to travel,” she added.

Okay, but we're not talking about people with informed consent here. Texas has been misleading or lying to people to get them on these buses.

[-] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 days ago

Can certainly use one to ban abortion though! Jackasses.

[-] SARGE@startrek.website 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"You are not allowed to use the law to block human trafficking" - A judge in the US

I'm not saying laws are inherently just and good, this just isn't a good look.

On par, though.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

No, you misunderstand. This doesn't have anything to do with human trafficking.

This judge would allow any criminal behavior, so long as it benefits Republicans.

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Like it's a law you shouldn't be able to pick when it best applies to you... If it's a dumb law and it no longer is applicable then like get rid of it. But if the law is there then it should be followed...

This whole election is eye opening and yeah

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
93 points (100.0% liked)

News

23275 readers
3080 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS