875
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Donald Trump’s re-election has fueled a surge in misogynistic, homophobic, and racist rhetoric among young men, reportedly emboldened by the president-elect’s history of inflammatory remarks about women.

In schools, boys have been caught using phrases like “your body, my choice” against female peers, prompting districts like Minnesota’s Hopkins Public Schools to issue warnings to parents about harassment.

The impact extends beyond schools, with activists on Texas State University’s campus displaying signs asserting that “women are property.”

This hostile climate has left many women feeling unsafe as a new far-right administration takes power.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 268 points 8 months ago

Remember that 53% of white women voted for this.

They voted for them and all women to be considered property.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 90 points 8 months ago

College-educated white women backed Harris. All college-educated groups did. Maybe Democrats should work on making college more affordable, and accessible to women with small children. Frankly we should anyway. We should also start helping girls that get pregnant in high school finish with their diploma so college will be an option in their future. Especially since more of them are going to be forced to carry the pregnancy to term.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 84 points 8 months ago

Maybe Democrats should work on making college more affordable

Why do you think the wingers reacted so much to having loan forgiveness? Anything that educates more people is something they fear. Having people not being saddled with crippling debts after school only sends a message to others that maybe education is a path for them. The wingers don't want an educated citizenry.

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

No, the gop has weaponized anti-intelectualism. The reds won't vote for a candidate that wants to make college affordable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 22 points 8 months ago

The DoE is already under attack. It’s part of Project 2025, and they’re laying the groundwork for it already. They’re going to work hard to ensure education is difficult to access and/or neutralized as much as possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world 76 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately no one hates women more than other women.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Article filled with examples of men expressing hatred and misogyny towards women

"Ayup, no one hates women more than other women!"

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

You still can't deny that women do hate women here.

53 percent of women hate women with that additional 10 percent of young women that voted to hate women.

I mean I'm willing to give women as a whole a quarter as a condolence prize since they played themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] neoman4426@fedia.io 142 points 8 months ago

Wow, the guy who bragged about how he sexually assaults anyone he finds attractive, talked about how he had the same "on the younger side" tastes as his best friend Jeff, talked about how he liked hosting beauty pageants because it gave him an excuse to walk in on girls while they were changing, etc emboldened other people to act the same way? Utter shock. This could never have been anticipated

[-] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 96 points 8 months ago

Anybody who's surprised should take a deep look in the mirror. You bitches elected a literal rapist into the white house. This is the "great" leader republicans rally behind!

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

Rapist, terrorist, moron. The trifecta. We're literally living in the worst timeline :/.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mhague@lemmy.world 88 points 8 months ago

Ah yes, economic anxiety. That's why racism and misogyny.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago

But they felt poor! That's what is making them so rapey and weird! I mean, eggs cost what, $100 each now?

The thing is: Biden and the Democrat Party made them this way!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 75 points 8 months ago

Maga is not sending their best. They're bringing crime. They're rapists.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

They're absolutely sending their best.

The problem is what they're best at is being Maga assholes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 75 points 8 months ago

the america the majority of americans want. sickening

[-] ziggurat@lemmy.world 44 points 8 months ago

Now we have both the middle east and the middle west

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 66 points 8 months ago

The proper response to "your body, my choice" is "your nuts, my knee."

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 47 points 8 months ago

The correct response is "If I'm going to jail because abortion is murder, I may as well kill my rapist"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 57 points 8 months ago

Calm down, everyone. Remember, both sides are the same. Harris would have been absolutely no different.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 56 points 8 months ago

Hmm maybe enabling these people was a bad idea

[-] lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works 55 points 8 months ago

20% of Americans voted for him because he told them it's ok to be a rapist.

Chat, are we fucked?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago

Also, I'm afraid this is not just a "spike", per se, but more like a prelude to much worse, including not just threats.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

Cue restrictions on the freedom of movement of women. To "protect" them, of course.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 34 points 8 months ago

Dude literally said he was gonna “protect” women whether they liked it or not. I took him at his word, but clearly a lot of women didn’t.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago

Expect women to start cutting dicks off.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

Great, now I'm going to have to start punching school-children.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] LilDestructiveSheep@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

Whats even more worrying.. that doesnt come just from somewhere. This kind of thoughts existed before.

I am really worried. This is taking an ugly turn quite fast. I'm so sorry..

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 37 points 8 months ago

Isn't this kind of shit that you guys have the 2nd amendment for?

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

women shouldn't need to kill people in order to live in the US. And their assailants almost certainly also have access to firearms because, the US (either legally or in violation of red flags etc).

people shouldn't need to kill just to go about their fucking lives.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

Tbh, this is all a fucking distraction from the class war that the oligarchs are winning without competition. And what a distraction it is! The cure to all these ills is higher taxes on the wealthy, but I don’t think any of those reforms are going to be remotely possible now lol

[-] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

How sad due to the internet, this is spilled over to the younger generation.

statistically younger generations tend to skew more liberal. Now we know why Musk bought Twitter propaganda.

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 26 points 8 months ago

This is why I wish those voters had held their nose for Kamala

[-] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

LPT: I’m not opening this shit. I’m holding my family close. I’m gonna work my job. I’m gonna exercise and get sleep. I’m gonna stay healthy. I’m gonna vote in 4 years for a better president.

But I’m not going to turn my guts into knots over shit I cannot change. I’m not going to let the noise bury me.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Voting won’t save us. Not trying to throw a wrench in your plans to stay healthy and happy. But true mutual aid is what is most necessary now. Voting is what got us into this mess. Incrementalist politics will not save the climate, will not save us from fascism.

It’s the hard truth that the ownership class has brought to our lives. It’s the logical outcome of capitalism. This is sort of the endgame. We fight now. Relying on voting alone only enables more of the same. We’ve been trying to vote as long as the system has been around. And it’s led us here.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

This is who we are. This shit was out in the open for all the degenerates to see and vote for.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Unrelated, but there was another article that showed up when i scrolled down about the Dems holding the PA House that was really interesting:

"Burns, a conservative anti-abortion Democrat, has drawn the ire of the Pennsylvania GOP for some time now, as his seat was viewed as a vulnerable blue dot in a sea of red. But he was able to maintain his seat thanks to an influx of cash ($3.4 million from the Pennsylvania House Democratic Campaign Committee) and a potent advertising blitz to keep Democrats in control of the state House.

One ad the Burns campaign ran capitalized on his conservative views, stoking anti-immigration based fear and casting Bradley as against Trump’s draconian immigration plans. “President Trump supports secure borders and putting America first. But Amy Bradley doesn’t,” the ad stated menacingly. It was a successful tactic for Burns in his otherwise deep red district."

That's a sign to me that people aren't as huge a fan of MAGA as one would believe and the voting base is more fluid. Not saying Dems should shift to anti-immigration / anti-abortion, but locally they should be more strategic about how they play these things. We don't have to agree with everything a down-ticket Democrat does... if they need to adjust their positions based on local sentiment we should be open to that as long as nationally we know where we stand.

That's what MAGA did with abortion...nationally oppose it, but claim to "give the choice to the states" to placate local fears. Localized and targeted messaging. If they don't want student loan forgiveness, don't run a single ad about student loan forgiveness in that state/county. If they mainly about immigration, make every ad about what the immigration bill would've done, that Trump/MAGA blocked it, that "BLOOD IS ON THEIR HANDS" as MAGA would put it.

Don't give up our overall ideals but start to better recognize that everyone has different priorities and we need to build a popular movement that connects with everyone.

Every and any avenue should be explored.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
875 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24936 readers
2359 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS