178
submitted 1 week ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago

Yup. Congrats 15 million Democrats and progressives that didn't vote, you just gave us the greenlight for Democrats to never run a imperfect Democratic candidate.

Congrats! You did it!

[-] ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago

I’m really getting tired of this narrative. It completely invalidates that +73M people voted for Trump. More than 73 million people thought he was the right choice. It’s less important that Harris got 15 million less votes than Biden and more important that more than 73 million brain dead morons exist in this country and there’s an extremely high chance that at least 25% will procreate and continue our Idiocracy long beyond our lifetimes.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well too damn bad because it's true. Those 73 million were always going to vote this way, every Democrat knew that, every progressive knew that. They always vote for a Republican even if that guy is a convicted felon and rapist, we all knew that going in and they did exactly that because scorpions are going to scorpion.

Ever Democrat and progressive knew the stakes, they knew what the opposition was going to do and they didn't show the fuck up.

Hell no, these fascist condoning, racist condoning jerks get a lot of blame here as well they should.

[-] Lizardking13@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Your narrative is incorrect though. You can't just call 1/3 of the country a braindead moron and move on. There are plenty of perfectly intelligent people that voted for trump. Simplifying all of this to 'well they're idiots' doesn't help anyone find a solution.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

There are plenty of perfectly intelligent people that voted for trump.

No, there aren't. The truly intelligent people who support Donald Trump are in the Machiavellian evil camp. They are the herding dogs that use their understanding of the weaknesses of human psychology to manipulate the rest of the stupid, unwashed masses who blindly follow Donald Trump because of their in-group dynamics.

The intelligent epicenter makes up an extremely small margin of hyper-wealthy (and/or) moral Nihilists who's goal is to collapse U.S. hegemony and by-proxy Western society so they can economically enslave the remaining remnants of the human race with discretionary economic power.

So, no, it is not "plenty". It is an incredibly small subset of individuals who actually understand what is going on, and are using it to their direct advantage.

[-] Lizardking13@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Hey go ahead and keep going with that narrative. It won't help anyone.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago

And it will have repercussions for decades and decades. Many, even many younger people, will now not see any changes in the overall makeup of SCOTUS in their lifetime.

[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

It's crazy. He was already tied for sixth most SC justices appointed (with seven other presidents). If Alito and Thomas retire and he replaces them, he'll only be behind Washington, FDR, and Taft. His numbers for other judicial appointments were already very high as well.

People really do not appreciate how long we'll be feeling the consequences of this if we survive this term and move on to someone sane.

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

It's not 15 million, it's a few tens of thousands in a handful of swing states. Millions more Harris voters in New England, New York, and California would have had the same result.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes it is. Don't misconstrue the results.

Trump is currently winning the popular vote (73m to 69m). A vast majority of total votes are counted so it won't go up more than another million or so from there.

Trump lost the popular vote in 2020, 81 million to 74 million.

Trump's margin in swing states is currently well over 100,000.

Trump's total vote count basically didn't change at all, but there are currently 12 MILLION people who just didn't show up to vote for democrats. Sure the electoral college was "decided" by a few hundred thousand, but this was a collosal collapse of democrat voter turnout nationwide.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In before "[liberal judge X] should have retired so Biden could have nominated their replacement". You all know damn well it would have gotten held up in the Senate because "election year". Yes, Schumer wouldn't have blocked it like McConnell and VP Harris could have broken the tie since a simple majority is all that's needed to confirm, but there was absolutely no guarantee Manchin and/or Sinema would have played ball.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah so why bother at all, right?

Your opponent doesn't have to do anything if you don't even try.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

as critical as i usually am of the democrat’s strategy of doing nothing, i think it was the right call here. if the appointment of a new justice did get blocked (which it very likely would have), then that would translate to yet another justice being appointed by trump. and that’s simply too big a risk to take

[-] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

SCOTUS appointments are the longest lasting consequences of a president being elected, and should be one of the highest considerations. But I guess the price of Doritos and a fucking squirrel won out this year.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

SCOTUS has been McConnell's main focus his entire career for this very reason. And, unfortunately, he's been extremely successful. It will have consequences for decades if not generations.

[-] Dhar@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago

SCOTUS already green-lit Trump's ability to simply remove the undesirable justices, why wait for them to retire?

[-] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

They don’t even have to use unconventional routes to remove judges from the SCOTUS, all they have to do is impeach. ‘But, they don’t have the numbers in the Senate!’, once a few congressmen fall out windows, everyone else will rubber stamp whatever else the GOP wants, to include impeaching leftist judges and expelling leftist congressmen who don’t fall in line.

Yep. I’ll be genuinely shocked if Congress doesn’t start to look a whole fucking lot like the Duma.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They look pretty duma to me already.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Okay, but that's the same "unconventional routes" with extra steps. What's the point of doing it indirectly instead of directly?

[-] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Total control, they can impeach every democratic judge and expel any and every democratic congressman/woman if they don’t play ball. And you still have the appearance of following the constitution.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

There is no fucking maybe here. You, your children, your grandkids and their kids, at least, will have, not only a conservative majority, but a fully unqualified, sycophantic trump cultist majority. Period.

America got the late stage 4 diagnosis last Tuesday. We won't spontaneously combust the next day, but we are effectively dead (as a united states) at this point- the democracy experiment was ultimately a failure. We couldn't keep the Republic.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Thanks Democratic party for being such an out of touch dog shit party. You caused this.

[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

They'll still blame everyone except themselves, they already are.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

I guess it will be safe to kill all of them then...

[-] kirbowo808@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 week ago

Yayyyy…… can’t wait for even more rights to be dismantled…… (not)

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
178 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3028 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS