732
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 125 points 8 months ago

Too complicated for 90% of voters to comprehend.

They saw: Democrat president made my groceries more expensive

They heard: Democrat replacement will do things around the same as they used to be. Republican guy is going to do things VERY differently.

And the herd mentality took over past that point

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 33 points 8 months ago

You can’t honestly think this is true. People didn’t switch—at least not any significant percentage. I think it was a 1% swing. People stayed home.

The democrats don’t own the votes of people. They swung for the neocons. Leaving the people who’d been arrested for sitting in their schools for not liking a fuckin genocide to sacrifice their values. Again. It’s always on those of us that want better to sacrifice our values to keep the wolves from the door. While the Democratic Party opens the back door for them when they hold the keys anyway.

They are doing the same thing over and over, shutting out even a middle of the road progressive like sanders. And then they expect to hold onto voters who want real change? They can’t promise more and more of the same and then expect people to get excited. This is 100% on them.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

People stayed home.

Abstaining is a vote unto itself, and partisans of both flavors are wont to ignore that voting doesn't materially affect the lives of the poor and middle class. No matter who they elect things get worse, so when faced with the choice of missing a badly-needed day's pay and voting, they choose to get paid.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I mean, this is true, but in most states you have the option to vote early, vote by mail. We can’t ignore the middle part of your statement: capitalism is getting more and more hostile and no one is offering us a solution. Just giving us differently colored badges to pin to our lapel while telling us the beatings will continue until morale improves.

Give us someone who is actually speaking to us and our needs and we’d have turnout like they wouldn’t believe. But both parties actively suppress anyone trying to do so. Which has been on display my entire life, but has definitely come into much sharper focus in the past 12 years.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Joelk111@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

I hated reading this, because it sure seems like it's the truth.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

The simple fact is a LOT of Americans don't have the time to do real research. They are entirely reliant on media to break down the complex issues into small chunks. And we know that no longer exists.

Do we expect someone that has to work 2 or 3 jobs to make ends meet now and an hour or two helping their children with homework, to also spend hours researching current events and political stances beyond what they can get in 30 or 60 minutes from the TV before they have to go to bed and do it all over tomorrow?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 60 points 8 months ago
[-] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

At her Michigan Rally two days ago she vowed to do all she can to end the war in Gaza. Granted it was way too little too late. No idea why she waited until a day before the election to say the thing everybody has been wanting her to say since the beginning.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

Harris actively banished Gaza from her campaign. She did not allow Palestine at the DNC. She promised to keep sending weapons to Israel. Her position was extremely clear.

Vague lip service two days before the election means nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 22 points 8 months ago

It's not a war, it's a genocide. The UN is able to call it a genocide. The Hague is able to call it a genocide. The fact that Harris refused to acknowledge it as a genocide meant that nothing further would actually be done.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 15 points 8 months ago

Because she saw that she was gonna lose. Or thought it would fly under the radar to not piss off more but somehow convince others that she meant it?

The Democrats seemed to have thought the election a game that could be won with clever tactics and moves the whole time instead of meeting the challenge head on. Truly a shit show of poor party management.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's not their platform was weak. It's that they are weak. They hold their tongue while their opponents are jerking off in their face. They mind their Ps & Qs while someone holds a gun to a child's head somewhere in America. They govern "responsibly" while half the government is on fire. There is no sense of urgency, there is no sense of reality, there is no sense they actually giving a fuck.

It's easy to stand up there at the podium and wane intellectual about filling the sky with stars and ask us all to "keep fighting" but where was your fight? How did you lose to this with everything on the line?

Why would we fight for a bunch of fish to be thrown on land so we can sit there and watch them flop around drowning in a political environment that is killing them?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

I might go one further and say "Look, you need to take my platform seriously!" isn't a winning message when the last guy lied about his platform. Biden took office promising a bunch of BernieBro shit - debt forgiveness, climate change reform, prosecution of corrupt officials from the prior administration, voting reform - and then failed to deliver. Obama ran into the same shit after 2008, tanking his majorities in 2010 and then pulling through despite a negative approval rating in 2012, because he did not deliver the goods.

How did you lose to this with everything on the line?

Its easy to forget that conservatives (particularly the heavy hitters) also have a ton of shit on the line. You'll notice Wall Street loves a full GOP House/Senate/Presidency and the market is surging. Crypto is surging. Elon Musk and the Winklevoss Twins and the Murdochs and even Bezos are bullish on the next four years. These people had vast fortunes on the line and they acted like it. They turned the country against the Democrats by hook and by crook, through their mass media and their industrial stoogies.

The Democrats needed their old allies in the labor movement to push back. They needed teachers and university students. They needed the urban professional class. But after Biden sold out the rail unions and failed to support service sector or aerospace or even the fucking Postal Service? After he flubbed debt forgiveness for college grads? After he let state governments (in Red and Blue states alike) run roughshod over public education? Who was left?

Dems immolated their own base, chasing the traditionally conservative upper middle class white homeowners. Schumer promised that every blue collar voter who went to Trump would be replaced by two suburban moms. Oops.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago

Yes, the lesser evil lost to the greater one again, and they and their diehard supporters insist on learning nothing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 43 points 8 months ago

"vote for a ceasefire" is the ceasefire in the room with us now? Because I'm not surprised people DIDNT vote for someone who was the fucking president but refused to pressure to end a war because it could be used as leverage in an election campaign.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 14 points 8 months ago

Do you think Kamala Harris was the president, or do you think people are upset that voters didn't vote for Joe Biden?

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago

I'm pretty sure she vowed to not be silent on Gaza, and then didn't really bring it up until 2? days before the election? Even if she said somewhere about ceasefire she clearly didn't mean it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 41 points 8 months ago

Straight up Reddit tier cope from liberals this last week. If you wanted to win don't turn away 15 million people from your base to pander to a bunch of MAGA voters who were always picking trump regardless. Absolute fucking morons.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 17 points 8 months ago

Drag agrees that Harris's campaign sucked, and Harris is to blame. Drag also thinks America voted for a fascist, and America is to blame. The great thing about blame is that two people can both be 100% at fault.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] archomrade@midwest.social 40 points 8 months ago

People forget that nationwide elections are ordinarily determined by infrequent voters to begin with.

It wasn't high-propensity voters voting for trump, third party, or abstaining, it was ordinary non-political americans who didn't see a point in voting for a status-quo center-right candidate.

People have been screaming at democrats since at least 2008 that they need more progressive, more radical policies, and they've repeatedly avoided addressing those concerns. Trump ran in 2016 as a moderate. He came out on the left of fucking hillary clinton on the war in Iraq and interventionism. She lost to trump because he maneuvered to the left of her, and democrats still have not fucking learned.

Democrats need to let go of their moderate progenitors and re-build their base from the bottom left. They're leaving millions of voters on the table because they keep hamstringing themselves on a bygone era of popular neoliberalism, and there's nobody left to blame now but the party itself.

[-] pinkystew@reddthat.com 13 points 8 months ago

She lost to trump because he maneuvered to the left of her

Nobody voted for Trump because he was "more left than Hillary". That's not why anyone voted for him.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] NewDark@lemmings.world 35 points 8 months ago

People didn't turn out much more than they changed their vote.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 19 points 8 months ago

Drag will amend drag's question.

You seriously thought a fascist dictatorship was an alternative not worth preventing?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

Their platform was weak.

They ran an old man with brain damage for most of the campaign.

His replacement spent two months of campaign time telling poverty wage workers to be joyful and didn't even put a platform on their website until a few weeks before the election. Watching that felt very tone deaf and condescending.

The other meme they repeated was how weird Trump and Vance are, as if they didn't already objectively know the voters don't care about that.

They didn't run a good campaign.

[-] franklin@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Well I'm glad we dodged having an old man with brain damage in the White House... ooh wait.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Fair point.

No matter who we elected we were getting a useful idiot for the rich, but that's partisanship for you.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 21 points 8 months ago

2 days before election Harris announced legalized marijuana and 1 day before that she mentuoned she would be ok looking into Gaza more.

Her "first time homebuyers" aid was actually only for first generational homebuyers mainly immigrants and who had rented from a corporate owned apartment complex for 2 years.

Her business aid plan was for people who already had a business operating in specific cities and areas for "black men and others" to get loans. emphasis on "others" being her's not mine.

It was a campaign of protecting status quo first, not people. While telling them they didn't realize how good they had it.

Weak is an understatement.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

The people are tired of the Dems presenting them with weak bullshit solutions to their very real problems and being told to get on board because the alternative is worse. The cost of living in America is drowning the middle class and the Dems keep throwing us water wings.

I don't agree that Trump's policies are the answer but I can understand desperate people looking anywhere for some relief.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mEEGal@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

this voting system is stupid as f@%k though: as a voter, you should be able to sort your candidates as per your preference, not chose pick one and only one

check this out : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method?wprov=sfla1

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Weak platform my ass. Half of the US population is simply too brainwashed to even comprehend what Kamala offered them.

[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Trump lost votes from last election. Kamela lost a fuck ton more. No one became a trump voter, kamela offered nothing to the left and expected support. Do I wish my fellow leftists would of voted for self preservation? Fuck yeah I do. But at the end of the day it's the candidate at fault. And Kamala did everything in her fucking power to lose the left vote. It's the same every god damn time with the Democrats. You want something to focus your anger at? Focus it at the party fighting trump 2024 with Trump's 2020 border wall, military, immigration ass policies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago
[-] mc900ftJesus@lemy.lol 22 points 8 months ago

Eh.

We’ve had it since 1919 in Australia, yet we still have the same two parties right and righter.

RCV alone is not the answer.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

You’re right. Most people will still vote for the primary candidates, but in an election like this past one where we could have had Harris and a white man on the Dem ticket, RCV could have swung the vote blue.

And no, alone it will not fix the problems, but it’s a key change. Yall have around 20% of offices held by third party or independent. US has none or close to none.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago

The ceasefire in Gaza was always bullshit and it was obviously bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

This is why abandoning the "grocery store" strategy for "trump said naughty words" was a huge mistake.

[-] Hackworth@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

I find all of this Monday morning quarterbacking pretty silly. Trump was literally fellating the mic and rambling incoherently a few days before the vote. "Strategy," hahah. Nothing Kamala's campaign coulda done was gonna get those 15 million people that chose not to vote, if simply listening to Trump didn't.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Resonosity@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

The most consequential issue for voters this past election was the economy. People are feeling inflation, whether that's through food prices, rent prices, or all of the above.

Harris didn't campaign to that. Instead, she catered to families with children - a diminishing subsect of society - and small businesses. Yes she advocated for a first time home subsidy, but no young person believes they'll truly have enough money to own a home in their lifetime.

Harris ignored the working class. And so they ignored her. Plain and simple. A political party has to fix its constituents' problems, or at least lie about it. She did neither.

Stop making this about voters.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Me: About to buy my first home.

Also me: Trump is going to be president??? Fuuuuuuck. May as well just light this big pile of money on fire!

Aw hell......doesn't matter anyways. Pennies don't melt......

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] VitabytesDev@feddit.nl 13 points 8 months ago

I know I will probably get downvoted but:

  1. This is not a comic strip
  2. Political content on non-politics community
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

So when will the Democratic Party unveil it's grand plan to actually RESIST all this fascism?

Does anyone have a schedule, perhaps?

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Stern@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

2008- Popular vote (D) 69,498,516 vs. [R] 59,948,323
2012- Popular vote (D) 65,915,795 vs. [R] 60,933,504
2016- Popular vote (D) 65,853,514 vs. [R] 62,984,828
2020- Popular vote (D) 81,283,501 vs. [R] 74,223,975
2024- Popular vote (D) 68,092,002 vs. [R] 72,747,033

Trump lost some voters. Kamala lost WAY more voters. Find out why 15 million voters overall didn't vote. Or more particularly, find out why all those voters came out in 2020 and not in 2016 or 2024.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The problem wasn't Harris or her platform, it was that more than half of American voters are fucking idiots. Massive public stupidity is a problem no politician and no platform can cure. We've spent more than half a century addicting ourselves to entertainment and convenience. We need everything presented to us in memes now. America collectively has shit for brains, so we're going to have a sack of shit for President. Congrats y'all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I won't vote for who supports genocide. Trump may not be better in this regard but at least I won't reward to those who already aided in it. Next time they should learn to do better.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
732 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

18490 readers
1707 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS