648
Which party I wonder...
It's crazy, it's always the party you'd most expect.
The one prone to violence and has control issues, then wonders why no one likes them except dumb, or sociopathic people, so they make up false equivalencies and conspiracies to justify their own sad existence? Hopefully the voters wake up and do a purge. Especially in the midterms.
"Libertarians" who always seem to vote Republican
That of law and order, supposedly
Gotta keep the pigs employed somehow.
Man, so much violence from both sides... It's hard to say.
That's one way to stop a trump vote, ask them to follow the rules and be curtious to others till they punch you in the face and get ejected from the voting location.
We need more people that can take a punchat voting locations. We only have so many old people.
They think rules only apply to those below them.
I hate Illinois Nazis.
Is this the second elderly who got punched in the face this election by a magat? I think it's the second elderly punched in the face by a magat.
❤️Family values❤️
It's like the fifth or sixth. All Trump psychos doing the attacking, of course.
Second so far ...
The day is young, so many elderly out there for a young MAGA to assault!
I really hope I’m wrong, but I fully expect at least one shooting incident at a polling place today. I’ve seen multiple posts by redcaps claiming they plan to go armed, and they seem to be spoiling for a confrontation. I really hope everyone can stay safe.
Nowhere in the article does it say anything to suggest who he was voting for. In a population of 300 million there are gonna be some number of crazies in every demographic
EDIT
y'all are loopy. I'm 100% team Harris, i even phonebanked for her - did you? All i said is that there's nothing in the article about whether he's a trumper or not, and there are some number of insane non-trumpers out there. If you think literally all people who aren't voting for trump are sane, then you're the one who's insane. It doesn't matter whether this particular person turns out to be trumper or not, the point is we shouldn't jump to conclusions or else we'll eventually wind up with egg on our face
Political violence is pretty party-specific.
This is a good example of keeping your mind so open your brain falls out.
No. The article doesn't explicitly say what party he planned to vote for. That's right.
Almost all instances of election violence have been committed by the same party - even the attempted assassinations. I'm sure there could be examples of violence from the other party but I'm genuinely struggling to think of any.
So if a reasonable person hears someone in an election line was violent they're not going to think "well there are crazies on both sides, so yaneverknow."
He follows Trump's Facebook page at the least
Ew, a Facebook user, I knew it!
Let's wager then. 10:1 odds, one millyun dollars.
His actions are a pretty big indicator but not 100% true.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Magats PUNCHING elderly people is JOE BIDENS fault because Joe Biden NEVER told Republicans NOT to Punch Elderly People! Family Values!
If Trump claimed it was Joe's fault because he punches elderly people in the face every day, 30+% of the country wouldn't just believe it without question but would start claiming it immediately.
Let me guess who he was planning on voting for.
FUCK YOU OLD MAN I NEED TO PROTECT WOMENS HEALTH!
Let me guess: registered as Republican, yes?
Good. One less.
Breaking news: we have confirmed he was republican based on a misunderstanding in Lemmy comments.
Hopefully he did this before he voted
The funny thing is agg. battery is a felony in Illinois which means he would lose his right to vote.
Sounds like he won't have to worry about voting for a long time, since I'm guessing theres at least one felony somewhere in those charges.
- 2 counts of Aggravated Battery to a victim over 60 (Class 3 Felony)
- 2 counts of Aggravated Battery in a public place (Class 3 Felony),
- 5 misdemeanor counts of Resisting Arrest
- 1 misdemeanor count of Disorderly Conduct
What a piece of schmidt.
24-year-old Daniel Schmidt
tch. Danny, Danny, Danny. You done fucked up Danny boy.
Schmidt, huh? Good German name innit. Is that a tattoo on your neck there ol Danster? Hey - I hear in prison you can meet new people!
Y'see Danny - what we have here is something we call an egregious crime. Can you say egregious? . . . very close! Anyway, you've got a room full of people who saw you act like a total MAGAt and punch a poll worker. They don't like that Danny. They're gonna testify, Danny. You're fucked on this one Danny.
But hey. Your demented rapist sociopath god will surely pardon you right? Good thing you didn't make the national news with a big ol' picture of your stupid ass face for - y'know - future gangs or whatever it is you may have wanted to do with your life or whatever.
On the other hand - it's a hell of an origin story for someone who never shows up in social media or the news again and spends their life helping others because they fucked up so bad. There's some audacious hope!
Another trump turd who will not vote.
Now they will claim the election is rigged because someone was prevented from entering the voting area.
Very smart, he sure showed them. 🤣
MAGAt
I hate to say this but why are they always hot
Based on looks alone, the most deplorable humans in my country are always the hottest and I hate it
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
648 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19097 readers
3959 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS