1168
submitted 20 hours ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Josseli Barnica grieved the news as she lay in a Houston hospital bed on Sept. 3, 2021: The sibling she’d dreamt of giving her daughter would not survive this pregnancy.

The fetus was on the verge of coming out, its head pressed against her dilated cervix; she was 17 weeks pregnant and a miscarriage was “in progress,” doctors noted in hospital records. At that point, they should have offered to speed up the delivery or empty her uterus to stave off a deadly infection, more than a dozen medical experts told ProPublica.

But when Barnica’s husband rushed to her side from his job on a construction site, she relayed what she said the medical team had told her: “They had to wait until there was no heartbeat,” he told ProPublica in Spanish. “It would be a crime to give her an abortion.”

For 40 hours, the anguished 28-year-old mother prayed for doctors to help her get home to her daughter; all the while, her uterus remained exposed to bacteria.

Three days after she delivered, Barnica died of an infection.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Juigi@lemm.ee 20 points 4 hours ago

It's 2024. What the fuck america

[-] neomachino@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago

I see stories like this a lot and can't believe it. My wife was in a similar situation and had to get an emergency dnc, and still came close to dying from sepsis.

The doctors were so on it, we waited in the ER for a while because they were packed but as soon as they took her blood and realized what was going on she was in surgery within the hour.

Our son want even 2 at the time. If we were 30 minutes west she would've died. It's absolutely fucking wild.

How could anyone think this is right?

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 54 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Vote Kamala Harris and your sisters, wives and daughters might stop dying for lack of health care when pregnant. Allow Trump to regain power and it will get much, much worse for the women you care about.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

What is the course of action that you expect Kamala to take that would prevent this situation in Texas? And if you have one, why hasn't Biden done it already?

[-] sour@feddit.org 1 points 28 minutes ago

What definitely will happen with Kamala is that women in New York or California don't suffer the same fate next year as well.

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 42 points 9 hours ago

Win the WH, win both houses of Congress, blow up the filibuster and enact national protections for abortion.

Will it work? Probably not. It definitely won't happen if Trump wins, though.

Plus if Trump wins, Alito and Thomas retire and get replaced by 25 year old fascists and things get even worse for decades.

I dunno if you were being sincere or intentionally obtuse, but it's kind of straightforward that we have to win.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I am not American, nor the person you responded to, but in 2020 the Democrats won the white house, the Senate, and the House of Representatives.

As an outsider looking in, why is there the expectation that Kamala doing it again in 2024 will have a different result?

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 3 points 2 hours ago

Unfortunately the Democrats need slightly more than a bare majority because some Democrats might as well be Republicans.

Kamala has also stated her support for exempting this legislation from the filibuster, something Biden didn't do. She wouldn't technically have the power herself, but might get Senate Democrats on board.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Back in 2020, I read op-eds from several pundits who worried that choosing Biden was a mistake, as he ran on a platform essentially of returning politics to "normal." They worried that once he won, people would settle back into the old routines, and forget about the simmering fascist threat and do diddly about it. I remember this well, because I feared the same.

That's pretty much what happened. Credit to the House January 6th special committee for finally forcing Merrick Garland to get off his ass and do a something about the insurrection... 2 years later. (Which made it easy to delay the trial until after the next election.) That's about it, though. Hell, this wasn't difficult to predict, given the way that Obama decided to "look forward" and not hold Bush administration officials accountable for their crimes.

That is to say, if Harris wins, I predict more of the same. Folks on the blue side will breathe a sigh of relief, make excuses for why they can't act, and do their best to forget about it until the next most-important-election-in-history. We (Americans) don't have a plan to deal with it, and they'll instead just get angry and call you and me disingenuous, or Russian bots, for pointing it out.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

That shit hasn't happened in less contentious times, I literally cannot imagine it happening now.

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Roe v Wade still existed in less contentious times.

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 10 points 8 hours ago

Ok probably not sincere.

The contentiousness is what put killing the filibuster on the table. In less contentious times, we didn't need to destroy basic political norms just to save people's lives.

It takes basically no effort to vote. Things are clearly better with Harris winning than Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 17 points 8 hours ago

we can't tolerate this. these supposed "pro-life" policies are killing, literally murdering women.

[-] don@lemm.ee 13 points 9 hours ago

Pro-lifers doing a fantastic job of killing people. Truly horrific.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 127 points 14 hours ago

A texas woman didn't die, a texas woman was murdered by the state's ignorant, bigoted, christo-fascist policy - abbott, patrick, cruz, gohmert, that cock eyed AG and the rest of them along with every complicit texas republican voter... they all have blood on their cowardly hands.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago

And if she didn't get murdered, she could have been charged for murder for having a miscarriage.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 hours ago

Pure fucking rage. Not advocating for violance but, I would vote not guilty.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Somewhat ironic username considering that’s exactly what every conservative is, smile and vote to fuck your buddy over. I’d be another on the not guilty

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago

Ok, and? What consequences are they going to face? How will their quality of life be diminished in any way?

I'll answer for you: none, because we, the little people, do not matter. Period.

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 10 points 13 hours ago

I have been sharpening my guillotine ... It could fix some things

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I’ll bring the Murphy’s wood oil and get that frame polished up real nice

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

Only the best for these demons!!

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Gotta keep those grooves clean so the blade doesn’t bind on the way down

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 54 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

This avoidable and preventable death brought to you by "pro life" partisans.

[-] dessimbelackis@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Anti-choice is gaining more traction and is more accurate. Anti-choice or pro-death is more appropriate and logically consistent

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 42 points 14 hours ago

Leaving Children without a Mother while also killing the Fetus is called being PRO LIFE and PROTECTING THE CHILDREN!

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 304 points 19 hours ago

there's another thread about outsiders' criticisms of lemmy, and one of the comments mentioned that it's "unwelcoming to right wing viewpoints"

I WONDER FUCKING WHY

[-] dandelion 205 points 18 hours ago

let's keep it that way, the right-wing should be unwelcome everywhere

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 80 points 17 hours ago

1000%. So long as right-wing equates to racist, seditious, traitorous bastards, then yeah...you're not welcome here or anywhere else in this country. Go find Jesus or something.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago

What country?

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Any amount of right wing will never sit well with me after trump. Things could flip and the conservatives could somehow be fighting for workers rights and I'd still side with the party that supports women's right to chose etc.

If lemmy became a right wing cess pool I'd be done with it in a heart beat. There are a lot of shit ideas on this platform and I do wish I could find my tribe but as much as I know of them, they are my people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Right-wingers don't have viewpoints. Fascism is not a legitimate political position. It is a threat. We don't call a serial killer's propensity to kill a "viewpoint". Conservatives have motives, not viewpoints.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 107 points 18 hours ago

I wish the world was unwelcoming to right-wing viewpoints. This is the result and so many people are fine with it. It’s so depressing.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ConstableJelly@midwest.social 114 points 17 hours ago

Many noted a striking similarity to the case of Savita Halappavanar, a 31-year-old woman who died of septic shock in 2012 after providers in Ireland refused to empty her uterus while she was miscarrying at 17 weeks. When she begged for care, a midwife told her, “This is a Catholic country.” The resulting investigation and public outcry galvanized the country to change its strict ban on abortion.

But in the wake of deaths related to abortion access in the United States, leaders who support restricting the right have not called for any reforms.

My country's aptitude for remaining entirely unmoved by preventable tragedies that utterly upend political trajectories in other nations has become one of our most globally defining traits.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

I don’t understand how a miscarriage counts as abortion. The baby literally died in the womb. This law is sickening. My sister-in-law had a miscarriage last year and it’s scary to think that she could lose her life by trying to become a mother. The crazy part is her religion essentially tells women they aren’t fulfilling their duty to God if they don’t become a mother. (Mormon)

[-] Ifera@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

For them, abortion is extinguishing a life. In this case, the fetus, although no longer viable due to mechanical impossibility BUT still connected to the umbilical cord and inside the placenta, gave it a heartbeat. Any human intervention that would cause that heartbeat to go away, such as inducing labor, manual or physical extraction, or even manual dilation of the cervix, since the fetus being way too young to survive outside of the mother, would end up being the cause of that heartbeat going away, and thus, murder, in their eyes. All they "can" do is "Let nature run its course"

It is beyond stupid, cruel and horrible. Those laws are actively killing people through neglect.

Edit: Miscarriage does not mean the fetus "died", it merely means failure to carry to term or to point where the fetus can survive outside of the mother, which is usually flagged at 20 weeks. When labour started, at an unsustainable pregnancy length, it is counted as a miscarriage because the fetus can't survive on it's own, however it was not a spontaneous abortion because there was still a heartbeat.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 30 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Supreme Court scandal
Gun violence
Police brutality
Politicized natural disaster relief
Food insecurity
Homelessness
Drug epidemic
Pregnancy mortality
And, last but not least:

Fascist attempted coup

America: 🤷‍♂️

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

America: this is a very close election, we just can't make up our minds. what about palestine?

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 52 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Many noted a striking similarity to the case of Savita Halappavanar, a 31-year-old woman who died of septic shock in 2012 after providers in Ireland refused to empty her uterus while she was miscarrying at 17 weeks. When she begged for care, a midwife told her, “This is a Catholic country.” The resulting investigation and public outcry galvanized the country to change its strict ban on abortion.

And that's the difference between a sane country and America. We don't even blink when children are murdered in schools- we sure as shit aren't going to do anything about dead women.

[-] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 54 points 15 hours ago

All life is sacred, except when its not

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 31 points 15 hours ago

Texas politicians and anti-abortion death cultists murdered this poor woman.

[-] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 147 points 19 hours ago

This is fucking barbaric. The hospital let her sit for 40 hours with a fetus hanging out of her uterus. Just take a moment to imagine what that alone must have felt like aside from the emotional horror of losing a pregnancy. We wouldn't even imagine treating pets or livestock this way but it's clear that these repugnant forced-birthers don't consider women to be people. One little pill to speed up the labor that her body already decided was needed was all that was required to keep this woman alive. What's the point of even having healthcare when we can't rely on it.

[-] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago

Not a lawyer, but I wonder if there a case to be made with letting a woman get an infection and die due to the fear of commiting a crime by killing the baby. In the end, two people died, but one could have survived.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 138 points 19 hours ago

And Republicans will never care about it. Fucking ghouls.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tronn4@lemmy.world 49 points 17 hours ago

The hospital should be sued for death from negligence

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 58 points 16 hours ago

The hospital's hands are tied by dystopian laws - this is what "pro life" looks like.

These are becoming way more common the more we let this right wing evil shit sink in.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 3 points 8 hours ago

I’m sorry but humans refusing to save the life of another human because of an obtuse law is unconscionable. They should have done what needed to be done and let the lawyers sort it out later.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It's absolutely unconscionable, but it's a medical (and very stupid/unnecessary) version of the trolley problem.

You're a doctor. The tracks going one way have a single patient that you can treat and save. The tracks going the other way have every patient you'd get to see over the entirety of the rest of your career - literally thousands of people.

Treat the one and risk an avalanche of legal problems to include losing your license; the literal thousands of people are now fucked. Skip the one under the legal microscope, and she's for-sure fucked, but your license lives to serve another day.

It's fucked up. It's evil. It's what pro-life gets us.

You cannot expect a doctor to risk their freedom over a single patient. It's like societal-level triage.

You can expect your lawmakers to not craft the world you live in into a dystopian hellscape... when they fail to live up to that expectation, don't direct your anger at the people they've put into a bind; bring it directly to the lawmakers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
1168 points (100.0% liked)

News

23276 readers
3538 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS