296

A shady new super PAC named for Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg just spent nearly $20 million on efforts to help Donald Trump appear more moderate on abortion, but the group won’t reveal where its money comes from until after the election.

The pro-Trump RBG PAC (a massive insult to the late justice, who hated Trump) is attempting to use the liberal justice’s legacy to try and boost Trump ahead of the election. Its website even features photos of Ginsberg and the former president, captioned “Great Minds Think Alike.”

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 77 points 3 weeks ago

Truly no bottom with these people.

Can someone libel a dead person?

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

No, sick as it is, you can't libel or defame a dead person under American common law

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

I sat here trying to come up with a defamatory statement about Rush Limbaugh to post for quite some time before giving up. I couldn't think of a single awful thing that wouldn't be believable. What a colossal piece of trash, even from the grave.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

I heard he was a big fan of socialism.

[-] Baaahb@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The national kind, yeah. Common knowledge. See above statement about how awful he was.

I am aware you're specifically referring to rush's specifically anti-socialist dint. But by suggesting he was a fan of socialism, you're committing to the same fallacy as he tended to, where he would equate socialists (from USSR so obviously they are mega socialist, and fans of the purges, read authortarians) with actual socialist ideology.

The grand irony of rush is that his solution to authoritarianism was authoritarianism.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

I was just trying to say something about him that he would find insulting. Anyways, tobacco did a good job with him.

[-] Baaahb@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

Entirely reasonable, and likely successful. There are however a bunch of weirdos here, and a bunch of people that won't understand the reference cause they do t remember the guy. No seriously, we grew up with him, but that was ages ago for the young'uns these days.

😑 and it only applies to people, right? Not estates?

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I believe that is the case yes. The logic behind why libel and defamation are crimes is that it can cause damage to a person and their livlihood. It could obviously hurt the earning potential of their estate, like if they were still selling books posthumously. But i don't think that's protected.

Thanks for breaking it down! It's been a long time since management degree law classes.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No…. But her likeness is protected under copyright, and that includes her name.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t think that’s possible for a public figure.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

There are fair use exceptions (for example, writing a news article,).

This is not a fair use.

Your likeness is copy protected at birth. As is any work you create is copyright protected when you create it. Yes, that includes the 2nd grade “essay” about your pets and the other one about your favorite food.

[-] Entropywins@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I almost thought you were on a sovcit rant...

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago

RBG obviously stands for Red Blue Green. They want to bring back CRT monitors. And TV censors.

[-] st3ph3n@midwest.social 12 points 3 weeks ago
[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

The New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The New Republic:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New Republic is generally reliable. Most editors consider The New Republic biased or opinionated. Opinions in the magazine should be attributed.


MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://newrepublic.com/post/187575/donald-trump-super-pac-skirt-campaign-rules
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] prole 3 points 2 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
296 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2794 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS