56
submitted 3 weeks ago by sub_ubi@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world

"Most every campaign cycle, it seems, presidential candidates and political pundits claim this election is the most important one ever. It’s become something of a cliché in American politics. This time, however, they just might be correct." - from 2012

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 17 points 3 weeks ago

I think I follow US politics pretty closely for the most part. Obviously every presidential election is important. However, there have been a few that have been critically so in my lifetime. I’ll leave it up to you to determine which ones were most important to you.

  • 1992 was the first election post Cold War. It was also a referendum on how Bush handled the first Iraq war, and how he increased taxes after saying he wouldn’t. It was the first time in a while that we had a viable 3rd party candidate. It was also a watershed moment for NAFTA which would have unlikely been passed under a republican president. Gay rights also made huge strides due to this election.

  • 1996 saw the rise of the religious right, and laid the foundation for the political theater that we experience today.

  • 2000 was a referendum on how important the climate was to the average American. I’m sad to say that the fossils won that one. To me this was one of the most important races of our lifetimes.

  • 2004 was a referendum on the handling of the second Iraq War and the continuation of torture as an interrogation device. This one to me is the one where we started to lose a lot of our standing and respect around the world .

  • 2008 was critical in that we finally got some semblance of a national healthcare plan

  • 2012 was a referendum on that Healthcare plan. This one is yet another critical juncture in the vision for America. The loss here made the right rabid. It also didn’t help that the 24 hour news cycle was no longer hamstrung to report the, you know, actual news.

  • 2016 was a referendum on electing a black man to the highest office twice. It was also about healthcare, but most importantly it was when the right finally got war fatigue while the left got globalization fatigue. It was important in that the US started to return back to its isolationist roots.

  • 2020 was a referendum on democracy. We hadn’t experienced such a vital threat to democracy since the era when the atomic bomb gave us near total control over the world. If trump had won, I fear we would ceased to function as a democracy at the national level.

  • And now onto 2024 - yet another referendum on democracy, but with the added twist that everyone is spurned by high inflation. The economy simply isn’t working for about 40% of the population. In any other normal year, this would be a shoo in for the change candidate, unfortunately for us that change candidate is a fascist dictator.

So, is 2024 the most important election of our lifetimes? Well, I suppose that depends on whether you value living in a democracy. For me, that is a resounding yes.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

2000 was a referendum on how important the climate was to the average American. I’m sad to say that the fossils won that one. To me this was one of the most important races of our lifetimes.

2000 was the first Republican coup, and a successful one.

[-] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I think when SCOTUS and Florida gave the presidency to Bush Jr. was the major attack on the system of democracy that we practice. Gore v Bush Jr. taught the conservatives how to harness the dark side of the law. Now they engaged in their lawfare stage of fascism.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

nice attempt to attach a storyline to being a prisoner-of-the-moment.

2012 which you rank 4th highest, where one candidate had formerly supported & implemented a version of the "national healthcare plan" and the other implemented it with conservative support. It was already law, and it wasn't going away.

Comapre anything on your list to '36 where capitalism itself was at stake, or '80 and the solidification of neoliberalism.

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

2012 which you rank 4th highest

They're in chronological order, bud, they didn't rank them.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

fucking lol.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Chronologically the most important in our lifetimes

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

The fifth most important item may come before the third, chronologically.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I've been able to vote since Reagan, every election since has always been the most important election of our lifetime and it's always been from the direct result of the people claiming its the important election of our lifetime. Democrats will always have a boogeyman to point fingers at that they're coming to take away your rights. And Republicans will always have a boogeyman to point fingers at that they're coming to take their rights. They collectively are coming to take away our rights and they have us fighting their battles to keep them in power so they can continue taking away our rights.

[-] ski11erboi@lemm.ee 31 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Sure but I don't think we've ever had a candidate with so many former hand picked aids warn us about the end of democracy if he's reelected.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Midterms are going to be the most important election of our lifetime, 2028 is going to be the most important election of our lifetime. Democrats will forever offer a boogeyman to scare you into keeping them in power.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

And to keep you from demanding better from them.

[-] prole 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know if we should be assuming those elections will even happen. If Trump wins, then I guess we won't need to worry about "important elections" ever again. Or any elections for that matter.

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Have Dems taken your rights to anything away? They've expanded rights for same sex couples and healthcare. Under Republicans my rights constantly get reduced. Abortion is the most recent example.

Also, every election is important because the shitty people who want to screw everyone over never take an election cycle off. Sorry if showing up once every two years is too much to ask.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 13 points 3 weeks ago

They’re an ML, don’t bother.

[-] prole 3 points 3 weeks ago

User tagging has become invaluable these last few months.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Once SCOTUS overturns Obergefell our marriages will become the purview of the states again. Interracial marriages will become purview of the states. If a single court clerk does not want to issue a same sex or interracial marriage because it goes against their beliefs, the Respect for Marriage Act allows them to do so. Your loss of women's reproductive rights was made possible by Democrats promising for 50 years to do something about it and then doing nothing about it. Three of those conservatives SCOTUS justices that removed those rights were put in place by Democrats. Democrats have done nothing but betray the working class for decades.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And it's always "but but the supreme court!" every 4 years. Like we need uphold this far-right de-facto legislative branch of government, and not threaten to kill it like FDR.

[-] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Are you fucking dense? Are you willfully digging your head in your ass? Where the fuck have you been these last couple years? None of this shit is normal, and you smugly claim it's not important. I guess project 2025 is nothing either, right?

[-] tiefling 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

FWIW, I previously tagged this person as pro fascism. So yes.

[-] prole 5 points 3 weeks ago

Mine says "bad faith, don't waste time". Interestingly, every user that has replied in support of that person has also been tagged something similar.

Hmmm.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Says the person supporting actual fascists?

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Is tagging a native feature of lemmy? I'm using the sync app and it appears to be a paid feature

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Knowing Democrats history of fully supporting legislation coming from the heritage foundation, it does not scare me. KOSA which was 100% bipartisan came from the heritage foundation. Got very little fanfare because it was bipartisan. Democrats will take individual components of project 2025. Rename it to something that sounds progressive. Liberals will get excited about it and they will praise it when it passes.

[-] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

What horseshit are you even talking about? Show me sources on your claims. Otherwise, it's just conspiracy theories with you and you can sit down and shut the fuck up. Accelerationist trash is what you are.

Fake ass communist.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

93-3 vote on a fully bipartisan bill written by the Heritage Foundation

How KOSA harms, specifically the trans community

The Heritage Foundation boasts how any other one of their bills gets passed

If there's been a bill that's been bipartisan that fucks over the working class, it's probably come from HF

How's that incrementalism working out for you? Your entire party became the party of Cheney and Baby Bush because of it. The DNC has filled the void Reagan Republicans used to occupy.

Now you didn't think incrementalism shifted left did you? Edit sp

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

constantly scared of the democrat's boogeyman, every 4 years. must be exhausting

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They're downvoting because this time it's the MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION EVER IN HISTORY, and it will remain so until 2028.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Politico - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Politico:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.politico.com/story/2012/03/the-most-important-presidential-election-ever-074188
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS