417

No Democrat has won a statewide race in Texas in decades. But conditions are friendlier than ever.

There's a reason no Democrat has accomplished a statewide victory in Texas since 1994.

Pulling off such an upset would require a uniquely talented politician running an almost perfect campaign. That candidate would need to display discipline, calm and poise. Be telegenic and quick on the feet. The candidate would need to be thoroughly Texan and have an identity infused with elements of the state's cultural zeitgeist. The person would need to run in a halfway decent national political environment. And even with all of those boxes checked, that rare Democrat would still need to square off against an extraordinarily disliked Republican running a lackluster campaign without much support from the person's own colleagues.

Enter: Rep. Colin Allred.

Allred's remarkable debate performance Tuesday spawned a flurry of Instagram slides, TikTok videos and X posts. Both in Texas and nationwide, news feeds have been flush this week with clips of the former professional football player **rebuking Sen. Ted Cruz for hiding in a "supply closet" during the attempted insurrection at the U.S. Capitol


a riot by a mob that Cruz himself helped whip up**. Others showed him repeatedly referencing the time Cruz flew to Cancun, Mexico, as hundreds of Texans died during the middle of a winter freeze, or hammering him on his abortion stance


an issue critical to white female voters who have been abandoning the GOP in droves

But an impressive debate performance alone is not enough for a Democrat to win a state like Texas. However, polls, fundraising and a changing political climate have all looked promising for Allred. Today, Texas Democrats are in an extraordinary situation, one that has proved elusive over the past three decades: They have an actual chance of winning a statewide race.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 104 points 1 week ago

C’mon Texas. You know you hate him. Why vote for him?

When assholes like Rick Scott and Ted Cruz keep winning elections, it illustrates just how fucked this country is.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 1 week ago

Schilling, a registered Republican from Collier County, helped to expose the $1.7 billion Medicare fraud at Columbia/HCA that brought down several executives and forced Scott's resignation from the mammoth hospital chain he built.

Florida: "Elect that man running that company!"

Old people can be dumb as fuck.

https://www.tampabay.com/hca-whistleblower-revives-claim-that-scott-knew-of-fraud/2200916/

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He left his dog to freeze and die while he went to Cancun during a power outage. HE TRIED TO KILL HIS DOG

HE TRIED TO KILL HIS DOG

HE TRIED TO KILL HIS DOG

FFFFFUUUUUUUU

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No he didn't, there was at least one guard taking care of the animal. Don't make shit up. you're sensationalizing a situation to create a narrative that isn't true. He's bad enough based on the truth. Don't give the opposition ammunition.

https://nypost.com/2021/02/19/ted-cruz-left-pet-poodle-home-alone-during-cancun-trip-report/

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9949571077

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So much of this lately. He’s horrible enough. We need critical thinking, too.

Ted Cruz’s seriously terrible policy positions

Ted Cruz Isn’t Crazy – He’s Much Worse

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 80 points 1 week ago

Do you know how hated you have to be to be the incumbent republican senator from Texas to lose in a general election?

[-] dcpDarkMatter@kbin.earth 47 points 1 week ago

"I like Ted Cruz more than the rest of my colleagues. And I hate Ted Cruz."

-- Al Franken

[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

A lot of Republican cans hate Ted Cruz here in Texas. They can't stand him. They think he's an ass.

But he's a Republican and that's all they fucking see in that booth.

Look at who is in office.

The governor, the Lt. governor, the state AG. They are ALL really terrible people, doing really terrible things. And the Republicans here don't give a shit.

The problem is getting the left to fucking vote.

And that cunt, Kim Ogg in Houston, endorsed Ted Cruz. (Side note, there's something rotten in Houston right now though and I have no idea what's going on. I have NO idea who to trust anymore.)

[-] ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

I really don't get how Texans can vote for a Canadian that changed their name? Don't they hate non-americans and people that transition? Why don't Democrats rub it in that he's "not American" and that his real name is Rafael. I feel like he would've been old news if any dem did that 12 years ago?

[-] JPAKx4 22 points 1 week ago

My dad was so mad about Beto O'Rourke bc he had changed his name to be less American, but has never talked about Raphael lmao

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

He hates the right people.

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 28 points 1 week ago

Be still my beating 💓

[-] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 28 points 1 week ago

I remember similar being said about Beto O'Rourke. In the end he floundered on the rocks of Cruz's candacy.

[-] trevor 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Beto likely lost because he said the stupidest shit that a dem running in Texas could have said ("we will take your guns!") and it killed his campaign momentum. And even then, he only lost by 2-3%.

To my knowledge, Allred hasn't shot himself in the foot like that, so there is a real chance for him to win.

[-] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Get your facts straight. Beto did not speak about gun control during his Senate campaign.

The year after he lost the Senate race to Cruz, Beto briefly campaigned for POTUS. It was during his presidential campaign that he brought up removing AR-15s and spoke about gun buyback programs.

Speaking about guns did not cost Beto the Texas Senate race because Beto is not a time traveler.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Man don’t give me hope…

[-] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

With all the STEM jobs moving to Texas there will be people from blue states going there as well.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

I’m early voting on Monday. Fuck Ted Cruz.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

If you kick him out, please don't kick him back to Canada. We're sorry he's there, but we don't want him back.

[-] hohoho@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I do not like that boy Ted Cruz

To Allred I really wish he’d lose

The man would easily fill his shoes

And kick out those red state blues

Give the boy a chance to choose

Between facing justice and Belarus

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

B L E X A S

B L E X A S

B L E X A S

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago

Do it you won’t

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago

You must have watched a different debate than I did. Despite knowing that every word out of Cruz was a disgusting lie, Cruz kicked his ass through the entire debate. Allred's performance was a textbook example of exactly why establishment Democrats frequently lose what should be easy races.

Cruz might still be hated enough to lose, but not because of that debate. I finished watching the debate and thought "thank God nobody watches Senatorial debates!"

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Nobody’s linked it yet?

Ted Cruz for Human President

It’s still there!

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The reason democrats never win here is because they are too stupid to understand their primary function is to represent their constituents. All we need is a democrat that understands you can’t run a campaign in Texas where you say out loud you will take away people’s guns.

[-] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

The only politician who has talked about taking away guns in recent memory was Trump.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Beto said it and it cost him the election.

[-] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Beto never spoke about guns during his Texas Senate campaign. There were only gun-loving conspiracy rumors about Beto “taking your guns”.

He spoke out about gun buyback programs and AR-15s in 2019, during his brief presidential campaign, the year AFTER he lost to Cruz.

Texas chose Ted Cruz over Beto O’Rourke before he ever spoke about guns.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Beto didn’t just run for senate. He also ran for governor. After his presidential campaign. And lost. I was just pointing out that someone actually did say they wanted to take guns away in reply to someone who said politicians never say that.

“Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47”

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/12/politics/beto-orourke-hell-yes-take-ar-15-ak-47/index.html

It was a really stupid move on his part, though after losing to Cruz he probably didn’t have a chance at beating Abbott.

[-] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

This is patently false. Beto never spoke about guns during his Texas Senate campaign. There were only gun-loving conspiracy rumors about Beto “taking your guns”.

He spoke out about gun buyback programs and AR-15s in 2019, during his brief presidential campaign, the year AFTER he lost to Cruz.

Texas chose Ted Cruz over Beto O’Rourke before he ever spoke about guns.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Oh please oh please oh please.early Xmas gift.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Idk how anyone could vote for him after that time he ate a booger during a live debate

[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Shit, I hope so. Fuck that guy.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
417 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19132 readers
3560 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS