Hmm.. I wonder why a certain user who’s been posting non-stop about third-party candidates for the entire lifespan of their account chose to ignore this particular article. One would assume it’s important for the voting public to know about this, no?
Here, I'll channel my energy into a representative comment so you don't feel left out.
"I'm not voting for her. You're free to vote for whoever you want."
"I didn't write the article."
<insert 40 paragraph spiel about fairness and lemmy always attacking them boo hoo>
You forgot to call me “friend” and channel punchable face energy with one of these 🤗 but I’ll give you an A for effort.
Thanks! :-)
Who are you referring to? I'm debating some "Harris needs to earn my vote. So it's her fault if Trump wins." idiots right now.
Unfortunately if I name this person there’s a good likelihood this discussion gets removed since the rules prohibit calling out bad faith actors, even the painstakingly obvious ones. So I’ll leave you with this: you needn’t look far to find that which you seek.
=)
I don’t know about you, but I’m saving this post for future citations.
Solid plan.
Hahahaha. Of course he did.
Can we all finally agree that supportingJill Stein is being the 11th person at the table?
How is he still alive? He has been an annoying public figure since the 80s.
Dem think-tank funded healthcare.
Best endorsement dems could hope for, really.
Not quite the same impact as endorsements from war criminals.
True, but not many people have lead what used to be the largest terrorist organization in the US.
David Duke ran the Portland Police Bureau!?
The KKK was the largest terrorist organization in the US by any standard.
It does kind of depend on how you classify various police departments and whether they're considered independent groups or cells under a single umbrella organization. But then again, in its heyday, the Venn diagram of the police and the KKK had quite a lot of overlap.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News