348
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackout@fedia.io 167 points 1 month ago

The 5th circuit includes Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi so they can go fuck themselves. You think I'll live by the opinion of some backwater states? Only a corrupt supreme court would uphold this ruling-ohhh fuckity fuck fuck!

[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

so they can go fuck themselves.

They didn't need your permission. That's how they keep breaking records for lowest IQ. ;)

[-] humancrayon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

You are the hero we deserve. Take my upvote.

[-] subignition@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

If they were any more inbred, they'd be a sandwich.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 42 points 1 month ago

If y'all don't like it, encourage your friends in Texas to fucking vote. This kangaroo court gets to be the reliable Conservative rubber stamp it is, because they're appointed by whatever president is in power when vacancies become available.

Biden was able to appoint two, and Obama appointed two, Clinton one. Bush Jr. appointed four, Reagan appointed two, and Trump appointed fucking six, which explains why they constantly capitulate to big business.

Voting matters. There is so much at stake.

[-] twack@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I mean yes, please vote people.

However the supreme court is stacked because Bitch McConnell is a piece of shit.

[-] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 month ago

FUN FACT: Five Justices of the Supreme Court were appointed by presidents who were inaugurated despite losing the popular vote! That's a full majority! And purely by coincidence, all of them are Republicans! :D

...alright, obviously it's not fun. I can't believe the audacity some people have to act surprised and offended when people say the Court is illegitimate.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

You do realize that federal judges crib notes from judges in other jurisdictions, right? As in, while this ruling probably doesn't directly effect you, if there's a similar case in your jurisdiction, they'll look at this decision and probably side with it if the facts of the case are similar enough.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 157 points 1 month ago

This needs to go to the next level. Do some torrenting off of the public wifi at the courthouse and get the courthouse's internet terminated.

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 49 points 1 month ago
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

Laws are only for the peasants to follow

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Supreme Court?

I don't think you want that. That will cause every ISP to block VPN and torrent traffic out of fear because essentially this will be "law" being established if they get their hands on it

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I was referring to the courthouse where the ruling took place.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

They mean the next level of courts.

They aren't suggesting that you pirate from the supreme court (although I have nothing against it)

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, they asked, "Supreme Court?" But I clarified that is not what I meant by next level.

I meant escalate the number of people being disconnected starting with the court that made the ruling. Or perhaps the judge wants that so as to force ISPs to be declared as utilities.

ISP's want it both ways. They want the protection of utilities without the regulations.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 150 points 1 month ago

A company "accusing" someone of piracy isn't proof. Access to the internet is almost essential these days. If you can prove a person is pirating prosecute them under the law with fines or even incarceration if warranted. But stripping internet access from someone shouldn't be seen as an acceptable punishment for a free citizen anyway.

Whoever owns the network attached to the IP address also shouldn't be responsible for actions of every user. Let's ban an entire company, college, or government institution from the internet because an IP showed up on a list... dumb ruling.

[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

It's like turning off the electric of someone accused of growing weed. Typical conservative response

[-] pirat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Remember to turn off their sunlight too!

And while we're at it, let's cut the wind off at their property as well, so they can't generate any local wind power!

And definitely take away their fruits and zinc and copper, so they can't build their own massive multi-lemon batteries, which they will otherwise rapidly upscale by growing even more lemons, using the same array of lemon-powered LEDs that also grew that weed, all in an infinite loop of lemon kush! We really can't let that happen.

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 87 points 1 month ago

So no due process, just "cut the Internet of the people we tell you to." What the fuck?

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

How's that plutocracy piss taste?

[-] uriel238 78 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The fifth circuit believes regional monopolies should be exploited to control consumers.

With proper competition, banning someone for suspected misuse would only chase them to competitors.

The fifth circuit is incompetent.

[-] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 67 points 1 month ago

Sony, WB, and Universal logic:

The people at that address probably use water to make meth. Cut off their water so they can’t make meth.

[-] pirat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Or they received a USB cable, which they later used to transfer pirated files, in an envelope... Remove their mailbox! (Or force every postal service person to ignore it...)

[-] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 month ago

more like 5th circus

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 42 points 1 month ago

I'm just glad they're still distracted with torrents...

[-] Omnificer@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

The implication of this being that I am behind the times, stuck on outdated tech, and didn't even know it is uncomfortable.

[-] lapping6596@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Oh God I'm uncomfortable too now

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The irony is that what they’re talking about is even older than torrents. It’s just less heavily policed.

[-] Omnificer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ah, that makes me feel better. I've probably heard of it before, and just never looked into it.

[-] JWBananas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] Nerdulous@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Are you guys using VCR to pirate media or something?

[-] JWBananas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I think USENET is having a resurgence with the cool kids? 🤷‍♂️

[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

In 10 years we will all be downloading cars

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago
[-] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

The first rule of [REDACTED] club, y’all.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Loose lips sink ships. Don’t be that guy, y’all.

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 38 points 1 month ago

If this is the case then artists should be able to shut down internet access for AI companies that steal their work in those states.

[-] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's only illegal when an individual does it, when it's a giant corporation, it's called innovation. /s

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 12 points 1 month ago

These "owners" are pathetic... Get a VPN tho fuck them

[-] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
[-] style99@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

It's not.

The 5th Circuit remanded the case to the district court for a new trial on damages. Record labels can expect a lower payout because the appeals court said they can't obtain separate damages awards for multiple songs on the same album.

[-] underwire212@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Soooooo VPN?

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Secretary KHAAAAAAANNNNNNN!!!!!!

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
348 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59407 readers
2253 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS