190
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I noticed that a link to the segment hasn't been shared yet. For those who want to watch - VP Kamala Harris Shares A Miller High Life With Stephen Colbert

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Did she actually drink it lol?

Unrelated, but one of the things that made me really respect Judy Greer was watching a Zoom call table read with the cast of Archer during COVID. Everyone was home and drinking elaborate cocktails except Judy - she was drinking Miller Lite out of a can. Respect.

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Did she actually drink it lol?

Yes, she (and Colbert) each took a sip.

Also, re Judy Greer, respect.

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago
[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Sure you can.

And Colbert commonly has a drink with his guests (typically whiskey or bourbon).

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago

Only applies to beer ads AFAIK.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Didn't watch WWE during the attitude era, did ya? Or the man show? Or expedition unknown? Or always sunny? Or cheers? Or lost? Or that 70s show? I could keep going but it'd be nearly limitless. Where did you get this idea? Fuck, I've seen people drinking beer on the news. Like, a lot.

[-] M600@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I always was taught that too. Maybe it was an old rule or maybe it’s after a certain time. Maybe it was never true and just something my parents taught me.

Also, maybe Kamala and Colbert didn’t actually have alcohol in the can

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

... Miller Lite though?

I guess she's a little older, but we have better options these days. Our microbrewery boom was like over a decade ago now, people don't need to drink the watered down piss anymore.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

It's easy to hate on simple beers, but honestly, they're fine. Sometimes you want a complex experience that draws your focus; sometimes you just want "a beer" because it's not something you want to pay attention to.

I lived in the heartland of craft brew for a very long time. I brewed, my partner brews. We went to festivals for brewing. These days, eh, a simple light lager is fine.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

My buddy has a good definition of it. He says there are "experience" beers, and "session" beers. Experience beers are more flavorful, filling, complex. Session beers are beers that are easy to drink without thinking too much about it. Like, an experience beer is for an outside deck dinner at sunset. A session beer is for a bonfire or something where you're looking to get drunk.

[-] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly. And frankly, from a brewing and chemical engineering perspective, the consistency and subtle flavors of a light beer are more impressive than something like an IPA where you can just blow out the drinker's palate with hops and win an award for it.

Don't get me wrong, I still love big beers. It's just that I'm almost 40 with three hyperactive, mischievous, and hellaciously smart kids under 10 (and a partner to match); there are many times where light and predictable is really nice.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Agreed, nothing wrong with a lager. Among simple light lagers, though, the major breweries offerings are particularly ... simple.

[-] Tujio@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Start the night with a good craft IPA. End the night with Rainier.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

Our microbrewery boom was like over a decade ago now

Thank you Jimmy Carter.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Beer that comes from a small company whose owner loves its products might be better than beer from a massive multinational umbrella beer corporation. Who would have thought...?

[-] ech@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

People like what they like, and that usually stems from what they grew up with, even of it's not the "best" option available.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

You also have to take into account the costs. Poorer people are likely to settle for the cheaper stuff, especially if they do it regularly.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, all tastes can be acquired, no question. It's just an unfortunate reality so many had to make due with vaguely beer-flavored water.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

I grew up in St. Louis, home of Anheuser-Busch and I always loved this:

What does bud light have in common with sex on a boat?

They're both fucking close to water.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Interesting choice. I'm not sure how popping a 12% doppelbach would have come across. But I respect a the quality of a simple thing.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Are they really doing the 'have a beer with' propaganda bullshit?

She is not one of us, she's clueless what our struggles are.

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Oh she’s definitely not one one you, that’s for sure and that’s a good thing.

She’s reasonable. And lives in readily.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

She spent her career locking up people like me and denying my rights. The ones not living in reality are liberals that cannot see that they have become the things that they claim to hate

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

People like you? So you’re a criminal? Because as a DA, she locked up criminals…. because that was her job.

And what rights were you denied exactly. Do you have a list?

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

No, and neither were the men she kept in prison after their parole dates so the state wouldn't lose cheap labor

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So…. What rights were you denied again? I need some clarification since you didn’t exactly answer the question properly the first time.

Please, if you will- list them by title and code so I can check this against what actually happens in the real world.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

You're really bad at what ever this is that you are trying to do

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Every. Single. Time this person posts they have an incredibly negative amount of votes. I have them tagged so that they're easily identifiable. I would encourage everyone to do the same so you can save yourself time from having to read their posts.

They're competing with the media bias checker bot for the lowest scores in history

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Does anything outside of your confirmation bias make you one easy?

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/08/kamala-harris-beer-stephen-colbert-interview
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
190 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3428 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS