249
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] paf0@lemmy.world 126 points 1 month ago

Good... but also I have no idea who that is 👴

[-] jerakor@startrek.website 60 points 1 month ago

45 million monthly listeners on Spotify. That is 10 million more than The Beatles right now. 60th overall on the top list of plays just above Michael Jackson. Half the amount of TSwift

So they are a well known artist.

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago

Reminds me of when I asked who Bad Bunny was

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago

Reminds me of when I asked who Pooborg Sea Cucumber was

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I mean, using these spotify metrics in comparison with all time greats is kinda flawed.

For example my band sold just as many tickets as Michael Jackson and the Beatles COMBINED in 2024.

I am not in a band.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Oh, did the new Beatles album drop?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago

Her music is infectious. Think 80’s Madonna if she were progressive, very lesbian, and even sadder and somehow more vengeful than Alanis Morissette

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Here's her NPR Tiny Desk Concert

https://youtu.be/w4WiXKGCJhg

Edit: her music video for 'Hot To Go' shot in her Missouri hometown https://youtu.be/xaPNR-_Cfn0

And for the Elton fans, her cover of 'Your Song' https://youtu.be/wslno0wDSFQ

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago

I know of Chappell Roan because she's recently been ruffling people's feathers by asserting boundaries against fans' parasocial weirdness; I've never heard any of her music, but this alone is enough to make me a fan.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Did anyone actually watch the video? She's upset that neither side represent what she deems acceptable.

She's young and doesn't understand that government doesn't get fixed in a day. Where we are is the result of influence from corporate stooges since Reagan. It's come to a boiling point and I understand her frustration. A vote for Harris is a vote for steering the ship towards what she deems is acceptable, but that ship sails slower than a lot people can understand.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 49 points 1 month ago

She's not that young, she's been doing music for a decade and working service jobs till now. And you can understand something and still feel it is unacceptable.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

She's 26. That's fairly young for a voter. Not really sure what her cv has to do with being considered old.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

You're so young that you think doing something for a decade is a long time.

[-] escapesamsara@lemmings.world 25 points 1 month ago

Doing anything for a decade is a long time. That's 1/7th of an American's life span and 1/8th of a developed humans life span.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

Doing something for a decade IS a long time, but that isn't your point. She has plenty experience in singing and being a pop star. She is still young. 26 is young.

It doesn't mean you should dismiss their opinion about everything, but don't let perfect be the enemy of good. She seems to be fixated on perfect and missing the march toward good.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aalvare2@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

I agree with the core of what you’re saying except I disagree that she “doesn’t understand” how slowly politics works. I think her decision to vote for Harris anyway speaks to that kind of understanding, else she’d endorse a third-party candidate/write-in in a poor attempt to speed-run democracy.

[-] lone_faerie 15 points 1 month ago

She's been getting a lot of hate for not endorsing Harris and people fail to realize the difference between endorsing and voting. Her entire point is that the government can't be fixed in a day. Voting for Harris is the obvious choice but her being in office isn't going to magically solve all our problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

She’s young and doesn’t understand that government doesn’t get fixed in a day.

I'm old and I'm still waiting for the government to be fixed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Yeah I get it. I was young once and I’ve even had to have the bitter realization that even Revolution neither happens in a day nor resolves anything quickly. I ask for the passion of the young to hold hands with the wisdom of us older folks. It’s easy to demand sudden change, and important too, but building bases of power are important.

Vote for Kamala then hold her feet to the fire. Vote in every primary. Discuss what you think with people around you when it comes up, I know I’m the annoying pro trains girl at work. Build the support and make those maga losers afraid to show their faces.

And entertainers can do so much. Cobain got people who wouldn’t otherwise thinking of homophobia as uncool for example

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Clarity_daffodil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Kamala isn't in the correct direction at all though. The democratic party serves to delay progress in favor of the Republican party. There's a reason they lie so much and confuse and refuse to address issues progressive voters want to address. It's not gonna get better unless people stop voting for the same "lesser evil" presented to them and pushed to them in the media.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago

“I just woke up to, like, people just skewing it even more,” Roan said of the reaction to her no endorsement post of Tuesday. “Endorsing and voting are completely different. I don’t agree with a lot of what is going on with, like, policies. Like, obviously, fuck the policies on the right, but also fuck some of the policies on the left. That’s why I can’t endorse.”

“I’m not gonna settle for what the options are that are in front of me, and you are not gonna make me feel bad for that,” Roan added today with a critique of both candidates and their positions, “So yeah, I’m voting for fucking Kamala, but I’m not settling for what has been offered, because that’s questionable.”

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Fucking spot on.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

fuck the policies on the right, but also fuck some of the policies on the left. That’s why I can’t endorse.

That's a lame take. Unless you personally are running, you're not going to agree with everything a candidate says. Hell, even if you do run you'll probably end up making decisions you're not happy with. Nothing is going to be perfect, that's not the world we live in.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 33 points 1 month ago

fuck the policies on the right, but also fuck some of the policies on the left. That’s why I can’t endorse.

That's a lame take. Unless you personally are running, you're not going to agree with everything a candidate says.

So people should just vote and stfu about any nuance within a party they disagree with?

Maybe I'm just not picking up what you're putting down, but that's how your comment scans to me.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

She's not really pointing out any nuance though, she's just vaguely saying "both sides suck, but this one sucks slightly less". At that point, why even bother with a public announcement at all? Plenty of celebrities don't endorse anyone and no one care because they're not out making press releases about it.

[-] lone_faerie 16 points 1 month ago

Did you not watch the video? She explicitly mentions transphobia and genocide. And she made that video because a quote of hers was taken out of context (much like you're doing) and people were saying her not endorsing Kamala meant she supports Trump.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

I can say that there are views that Harris has that I think suck, and at the same time say that I think Trump's views suck, but Harris is better. It's okay to be critical and still live in the reality of living in a FPtP system. Why make a public opinion? Just look at what her comments have brought. People are talking about her criticism of Harris, while also seeing that even though Harris doesn't exactly align with her views, she's still a clear better choice than that shit bag Trump. Intentional or not, her comments have gone viral and spread her views which will undoubtedly have an effect on some of her fans.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago

Genocide to the left of me, genocide to the right….. here I am stuck in the middle with you….

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Boomer centrists know what a search engine is, but since Chappell Roan didn't endorse, and voting isn't good enough, so they're like "Who? I never heard of her! She must not be very important if she doesn't agree with me 100% on my terms!"

Centrists can't imagine people being frustrated with their decades of obstruction and sliding to the right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Like, she sounds like, so eloquently spoken and with like, well fucking thought out opinions, like fuuuuck! Im totally picking who she is sort of picking but not picking like wow. For real for real.

[-] escapesamsara@lemmings.world 10 points 1 month ago

How old are you to still be criticizing accents that are older than the vast majority of countries?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lolola 24 points 1 month ago
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

One of the biggest pop stars currently. Here she is setting the record for largest crowd of all time at Lollapalooza in Chicago this summer.

https://youtube.com/shorts/UtDLBJGXCGo

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

starting to get big. you've probably heard her music on the radio recently if you tune into a pop station. she's got some good stuff!

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

r-radio?

I’m 45, and even I haven’t listened to radio and at least a decade

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Liberals: "There is no such thing as Blue MAGA."

Also Liberals: "Why aren't you pledging your undying loyalty to Harris without question just like me?" 😡

She had a very fair and reasonable take. Anyone should be skeptical and voting for Harris to Deny Trump is fine but that doesn't mean there aren't issues. People know the playbook by now material conditions and systematic issues won't get addressed post election.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

I guess I’m officially old because I don’t know who tf this person is or why I should care about her opinion but I keep seeing her name everywhere🤣

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

She has a really good queer pop album.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

The Rise and Fall of a Midwest Princess is an incredible piece of work.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

She's like if Kate Bush and Cindi Lauper had a baby..

https://youtube.com/shorts/hHvetfWOZn0

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Uh, it’s a ticket. You can’t vote for one and not the other. Walz is implicitly endorsed. I don’t understand what the point of the headline’s distinction is.

[-] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago

She's voting for Kamala but not endorsing her.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

She needs to get off the internet. She has more dumbasses and trolls now than she had total fans 2 years ago and she doesn't know how to handle it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
249 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2485 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS