598
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Montana's election season has gotten off to a rocky start after absentee voters realized Kamala Harris was not a listed candidate on their ballot.

The state was forced to shut down its electronic absentee voter system after it went live on September 20 when a voter reported that there was no option to vote for the vice president.

Max Himsl, a Montana voter living in the UK, reported the issue when trying to fill out his ballot online, according to the Daily Inter Lake, a local newspaper. He reported it right away to the Flathead County Election Department on Friday, September 20.

As a precaution the Secretary of State's office, run by Republican Christi Jacobson, took down the electronic absentee system for troubleshooting, although it insisted that very few voters had been affected by this issue.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 221 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why does the Left keep on getting away with this blatant election fraud!

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 183 points 1 year ago

GOP is nothing but a bunch of con men these days.

[-] Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee 90 points 1 year ago

This is bullshit. The Secretary of State in Montana is a woman. The GOP is both con men AND con women.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

DEI is everywhere smh😔

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 year ago

These days? Ronald Reagan was a decent actor. Maybe not as decent as Richard Nixon.

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 131 points 1 year ago

Next, they say that all ballots that were already submitted have to be counted as-is. Then later, it's revealed that there were Kamala Harris write-ins submitted during this time, but rather than being counted, they were discarded as invalid

[-] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

Republicans are what Jesus was warning us about.

[-] poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago

In Montana, I believe, write-ins for president are always invalid

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Why allow them at all if they're guaranteed not to win?

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 9 points 1 year ago

Hey, you may need a break! We don't need to write the fanfic for the other side, that's usually a sign of burnout.

You should rest up then get back to it when you can be less defeatist. We need you.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

People are downvoting you but I could definitely see myself needing a reality check like this in the next weeks, or probably days.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 year ago

Talk about you had one job. It's a fucking two party dualopoly and you still f'd it up. Wreaks of intent.

Also way to go Montana for having online voting though. How many states have this now?

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 year ago

I'm going to give you "dualopoly," it's usually duopoly but I like yours.

But the omission "reeks" of evil intent, as in we smell a rat. It will "wreak" (cause with terrible consequences) havoc on the election.

Obviously it doesn't really matter in Lemmy comments, but in case you want to use the words in a more formal situation, the more you know 🌈.

[-] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago
[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Look, it's a one-party system, be realistic. Before running an obvious spoiler you should focus on winning the Republican primary and getting more people in the state legislature.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 93 points 1 year ago
[-] tiefling 84 points 1 year ago

although it insisted that very few voters had been affected by this issue.

Sus

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 39 points 1 year ago

Even if a dozen voters were affected, that's practically the entire resident population of Montana!

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

in case you're having trouble understanding the population of Montana, I'll post a quote from Wikipedia below.

Montana, also. has not politically been absolutely Red or Blue. I'm not familiar with the politics of the state, but it is not historically Red or Blue, though I'm pretty sure it's voted for Trump, and it's previous Gov was a two-term Democrat. Current Gov is GOP Gianforte. Also sitting U.S. Montana Senator Jon Tester is a Dem.

People have been living in Montana for thousands of years. Ask them about immigrants. And I don't mean just ask the people running casinos.

The United States Census Bureau states that the population of Montana was 1,132,812 on July 1, 2023, a 4.5% increase since the 2020 census.[191] The 2020 census put Montana's population at 1,084,225. During the first decade of the new century, growth was mainly concentrated in Montana's seven largest counties, with the highest percentage growth in Gallatin County, which had a 32.9% increase in its population from 2010 to 2020. The city having the largest percentage growth was Kalispell, with 40.1%, and the city with the largest increase in actual residents was Billings, with an increase in population of 12,946 from 2010 to 2020. >>

[-] pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

People have been living in Montana for thousands of years. Ask them about immigrants.

The ones who've been living there for thousands of years, or rather the very few that are left, probably aren't too fond of it.

Or did you mean to write hundreds?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Source: not a single vote for her so far!

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Unrelated note: Jill Stein is doing very well!

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

And so it begins, GOP election officials are gonna be getting up to all sorts of shit this cycle. I really hope we can turn out enough to make their efforts fruitless.

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 19 points 1 year ago

Overwhelming numbers. Polls and national stories need to be ignored and we just need to get every single person we can to vote.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 68 points 1 year ago

This sounds vaguely illegal

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Has anyone done a systematic study on ballot bullshit like this to determine if it is ever in the other direction, or is it always, without exception, done to harm Democrats?

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

electronic absentee voter system

the Secretary of State’s office, run by Republican Christi Jacobson

All you need to know right there.

[-] chrischryse@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Didn’t SCOTUS say it wasn’t legal for Colorado to do that to Trump?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

Colorado was trying to do it on purpose using the legal system. This at least sounds like a mistake.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

“Mistake”

“Whoopsie daisy, I forgot to add 1 of the 2 candidates to the voting system, I’m such a silly goose”

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I mean, absentee votes in Montana are not a very good target if it was intentional.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

If you’re trying to sow doubt in the election process from the ground up, it’s a great place to start.

“Look Montana had an issue with absentee votes, where else do we have issues”

Becomes

“Montana had absentee voting issues, we can’t trust anything from absentee votes at all, they don’t count”

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Surely. But if your purpose it to affect the ultimate outcome with the electoral college in mind, then this is not a good choice. It's not exactly a swing state. Far from it.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

At this point the GOP will just keep trying crap like this and people will just allow it all ..... until eventually, the right just gets tired of playing around and just takes power out right because they know no one will stop them

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago

If you really feel this way, you're too tired and need a break. Others can and will spell you.

You should take some time to recover and avoid posting defeatist stuff like this.

Hope you feel better!

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

I also feel this way, I would like that break you're talking about. When can I expect my check for 12-48 months worth of living expenses and the ticket to a country that isn't one election away from fascism?

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Can't wait to hear about this on info wars.... Bwahaha

[-] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Nah, too busy talking to a robot

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 17 points 1 year ago

That's awesome, America is up there with Zimbabwe for rigging elections

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 year ago

Ahh once again doing the same thing orbán did in hungary. They had very few places to do absentee voting so there were 10+ hour queues at the stands. They knew that like 95% of voters outside hungary would vote opposition. The one place that had enough voter stands and proper support was romania where they had a huge voter base(after they gave out a bunch of hungarian passports because historically it was hungarian land).

[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Easy, mark all ballots already filled out as invalid because the choices weren't properly given. Less R ballots to count.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Dat voter fraud tho

Newsweek - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Newsweek:

MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.newsweek.com/montana-voting-system-shut-down-1957839
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] jhymesba@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Trump is 21 points ahead in Montana anyway. Harris never had a hope of winning there

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

What incredibly terrible logic. lol

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
598 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26221 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS