1021
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Tim Walz has said he’s “sick and tired of hearing about thoughts and prayers” following the Apalachee High School shooting in Georgia, which left four dead.

Walz, who was named as Kamala Harris’ running mate in the race for the White House in August, spoke about the Wednesday (4 September) shooting at a campaign rally at the Highmark Amphitheater in Erie, Pennsylvania on Thursday.

He told his supporters: “We believe in the freedom to send our kids to school without being shot dead in the hall.”

“The news cycle moves on within a day,” he commented of the incident, adding that kids had returned to school feeling excited and “now we have four dead”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 211 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We now go live to the official reaction of the American Fascist Party:

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

mtg seems to be really lovin this part. Are we sure she's not like 3% demon from hell?

[-] TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Wow, come on, who would really think that?

3% is far too low.

[-] UnpledgedCatnapTipper 11 points 2 months ago

That's insulting to demons!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 138 points 2 months ago

This shooting in particular shows major society-level failures. The parents were victims of the opiate crisis. Society failed to treat that problem at an appropriate level when it first cropped up and they failed to claw back the profits pharmaceutical companies made off creating addicts. We failed to fund school mental health services that could have helped a child who everyone knew was struggling. Society failed to recognize and address the domestic violence situation, failed to intervene when the child was being raised by addicts, and failed to remove guns from such a volatile situation. There are so many levels on which any significant intervention could have prevented this chain of events.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 37 points 2 months ago

This kid was already reported for threatening a school school shooting last year and the investigation stopped after they asked him if he did that and he said no. It's a fucking joke.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Country that insists we have a "mental health crisis" providing absolutely zero mental health care to people who are clearly showing all the symptoms of said crisis.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Country that says "nothing can be done to stop this" did nothing to try to stop this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

This is the real takeaway. The Republicans want to do nothing, and the dems want a quick fix in gun control. Neither addresses the root of the problem. The world as a whole needs to invest more in social services, education, and public health. It should be where the majority of money goes really.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

I've heard plenty of arguments from Dems for mental health care at various levels. Those things need to be funded, and who do you think keeps trying to defund government agencies and services for social/mental health issues? Usually not the Dems. The Dems have plenty of faults, including their lack of spines (in at least some cases), but the lack of funding for social services is not usually one of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

On the other hand some of those "quick fixes" are actually modernizing our gun laws to be like other countries that allow gun ownership. We should put all the work in but calling Universal Background Check and Red Flag quick fixes is like calling a highway lane expansion a quick fix. Yes we need a bus system, but the 2 lane road built in the 1950's isn't cutting it anymore either way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bappity@lemmy.world 100 points 2 months ago

‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 83 points 2 months ago

Walz's response to this is in very stark contrast to his rival Vance here. Vance gave a shockingly tone-deaf, "It's a fact of life" response that spits in the face of the victims and their families. It shows a fundamental lack of empathy that borders on cruelty (which might be the point).

Thots 'n Pears can only go so far, in this case not far at all.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 96 points 2 months ago
[-] ours@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Rich weird guy which I bet has his kids in private schools.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Feels like that bulletproof glass is infringing on my 2nd Amendment Rights.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 19 points 2 months ago

What this says to me is "I am rich enough to deal with the reality of mass shootings. Get fucked plebs. This is your problem, not mine."

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 77 points 2 months ago

I used to be lukewarm on the issue of gun control, ya know.. "Yes, it's a tragedy.. but, we've got a second amendment, just increase security in schools or something."

But... eventually it got to the point where I realized I felt nothing hearing about the dead kids and the constant shootings. I was just completely numb to it, and that's when I realized "Oh shit..."

When I found that the death of children wasn't something that even made me flinch anymore, I realized.... That even if we have to destroy every gun in the West, something has to be done.

"They'll just use knives"

And when you can kill as many people with a knife in as short of a time as an AR-15, that's when I'll give a shit about knives.

PS: I totally call it the Assault Rifle 15. I know it's the "Arma Rite 15" or whatever, but it pisses conservatives off when I get it wrong intentionally.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's really fun to call it an "assault weapon". That pops them off to an astonishing degree.

we’ve got a second amendment

Which very clearly states itself as being relevant to citizen militias, and somehow says nothing about a fundamental right to murder children in large numbers.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Knives are easier to defend. That's why the gun was made. If it didn't make warfare cheaper and quicker, they would have stayed with knives and swords.

[-] Tyrangle@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm torn on this issue. I want the sort of gun control that you're describing, but I really don't know if it would be constitutional, and defying the constitution is a slippery slope that could cause more harm than even gun violence. The problem in my view is the second amendment itself - it's vague, outdated, and in desperate need of clarification. The fact that it deals with possession of technology but hasn't been updated in 250 years is insane.

I'm with anyone calling for gun control, but we really ought to be demanding constitutional revision to address this issue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 70 points 2 months ago

Whoa buddy, too soon. Now is not the time to talk policy. Trans kids are playing soccer.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

It's those damned books fault. Better ban them all to be safe

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have an idea... shoots books

Problem solved.

[-] rednalsi@lemmings.world 48 points 2 months ago

easy: strict gun control. look at Europe.

[-] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

Sadly that won't happen because Americans are special - and I say 'special' in that Midwestern-US, 'bless their heart' way

The US government tries to pass (or enforce) any meaningful gun legislation, a third of the country stamps their feet and tells 'NO!' and the gov't backs down. Rinse & repeat

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

shiiiii it doesnt even get to us s'more like 2/3 of the country asks for (x) regulation, the govt starts making noises about regulating (x), a bunch of political ads come out to convince public (x) regulation is bad, contributions come from the (x) companies to the politicians regulating (x), business (x) is added to the commitee deciding rules for (x), regulation is watered down or outright defeated.

at almost no point in the process is the public will treated as anything other than a problem to solve.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago

basically the only way to get restrictions would be for several states to adopt a Black Panther Esque political party that has significant adoption and policing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

America has a gun culture though. While Europe doesn’t. In plenty of European countries you can get a gun license if you are willing to go trough the process and fill in the paperwork. It’s not super hard. Yet almost no one owns or wants a gun in those countries. And if they have one it’s usually a hunting rifle and not weapons for personal protection or target practice. If the US had the same gun rules as in Europe the demand for guns wouldn’t drop. Americans would still want a gun.

[-] rednalsi@lemmings.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

i was talking about serious restrictions and in-depth background check for everyone. nothing about gun culture. you can survive a little paperwork and a few months wait for a lethal tool.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

I don't know if anyone needed a harmless (slightly dark) laugh on the subject, but I recently played an indie PnC game called "3 Minutes to Midnight" with a joke around this. You open a wall medical kit, and there are sheets of paper inside, which read "Thoughts and prayers".

[-] cupcakezealot 39 points 2 months ago

no better indicator that prayer doesn't work then the fact that there's a new school shooting almost every day after republicans do a new thoughts and prayers.

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago

I don't think they believe it works.

I think they just believe that shootings are bound to happen, because why else would they be happening on such a regular basis?

It's the constant deflection of responsibility, from our choices as a society, to some indeterminate outside force.

Poverty and increasing cost of living? It's all those darn immigrants.

Your job not paying you enough? Must be overseas industry.

They don't think their prayers will prevent a school shooting, they just don't think there's other options to prevent it that will actually work without "taking away their freedom" (-to own a gun that's more likely to harm them than protect them)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] captainWhatsHisName@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

Survivor bias. Republicans think “thoughts and prayers” are protecting their own kids. They don’t give a shit about other kids they don’t know.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Worse, they don't actually think it works. They just care about the NRA's blood money more than the lives of your children. THEIR children are in private schools with procedures in place to prevent this from happening.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

I think everyone sick of being in this time loop of the same result happening over and over. Action is the only solution.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago

But the action is "ban guns" and the American populace does not want that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 22 points 2 months ago

Gray, 14, used a riffle to kill the victims in the hallway outside his algebra class. He will be tried as an adult. His [sic]

I hate the terrible proofreading/editing of online articles.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 months ago

somebody pray for this man.

/s for the fellow tone deaf people out there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] exanime@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

In the meantime, Trump is shrieking to his MAGA idiots about the completely fake "danger" of letting your kids go to school and returning home with a sex change operation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T-X_b__zXY

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

God, if only that's how it worked when I was a kid.

I was totally that guy who was "just kidding" and "just thinking aloud" about what it'd be like to be a girl.. but.. like "Not really, cause I'm totally a straight dude. I just wanna grab my own tiddies."

Now I'm a woman, and I just grabbed my own tiddies for fun.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Doxatek@mander.xyz 10 points 2 months ago

I have relatives that I shit you not fear this and believe it is 100% real. It's so extremely fucking stupid

[-] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Any sane parent would worry about their kid getting killed a lot more than about them suddenly transitioning to another gender even if both of those were real things that actually happen.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

They would rather tier kids have a good clean Christian death (being shot by someone mentally ill while attending school) than live a corrupted life (of not using the pronouns we gave them).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Look how far you've let this charade go, republicans... You know you have quiet moments where you are fully aware that you're just trapped in this irrational hate machine. This is literally a child named after a gun shooting other children to death. And you still just sit there, hiding in your full cowardice and not admitting outwardly that you chose the wrong path. You're a fucking disgrace.

[-] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

There is literally no way to do less.... Than hopes and prayers

It is a total abdication of responsibility for fixing a problem

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 10 points 2 months ago

These sicko republicans, they have no idea what the second amendment means, which means they are messing this up for all of us. I’ve always believed in a strong 2nd amendment which means I want a legal tank with ammo in a secure location in my back yard. These republifucker weirdos don’t even know what the second amendment means. If I have to park my tank downtown so be it, but I want to have a tank with ammo in a secure location, same should go for these assault rifles, etc. we need a well regulated militia which means we don’t get to keep weapons unlocked in our homes willy nilly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
1021 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
1960 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS