185
submitted 2 months ago by that_leaflet@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 16 points 2 months ago

Good algorithm, bad name. JPEG Extra Large.
O.g. JPEG has bad reputation, because of visual artifacts.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Interestingly, the reference implementation libjxl appears to be a Google project. They're all over the patents file and CLA.

If Mozilla isn't merely being hopeful about having the same team create a Rust implementation, that might actually mean there's internal interest within Google. Assuming they pull it off, the bullshit reason for refusing to add JPEG XL to Chromium might finally stop being a blocker.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Google basically made jxl. I'm sure there's plenty of interested people in there, it's always just been the chromium team blocking it

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's not the Chromium team. Google could have added JPEG XL to Android, but that's been stalled for nearly two years with zero explanation as for why.

The whole thing smells of managerial interference somewhere.

[-] missphant 10 points 2 months ago

The dream lives on.

[-] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

♥️ jpegxl

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
185 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17849 readers
65 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS