1083

Not so friendly reminder that musk specifically came up with, and pushed, for hyperloop knowing that it would never be made, as an effort to stop the development of highspeed rail in America and shift all political discussions of it because "something better is around the corner":

As I’ve written in my book, Musk admitted to his biographer Ashlee Vance that Hyperloop was all about trying to get legislators to cancel plans for high-speed rail in California—even though he had no plans to build it. Several years ago, Musk said that public transit was “a pain in the ass” where you were surrounded by strangers, including possible serial killers, to justify his opposition.

source: new york times

Also: 2024 update, the total length of China's high-speed rail tracks has now reached well over 45,000 km, or 28,000 miles, by the end of 2023.

They are additionally five years ahead of schedule and expect to double the total number within ten years. And, before someone inevitably complains about "how expensive it is", they are turning over a net-profit of over $600M USD a year.

Via

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 119 points 2 months ago

To be fair, China doesn't have to deal with eminent domain.

[-] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 125 points 2 months ago

And annoying stuff like human rights

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 79 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

On the "good on China" side, they standardized their train sets and rails to very few models for efficient and consistent systems, have the largest manufacturing base in the world, and the constant building of rail is training generations of chinese engineers how to build and run it efficiently.

The US builds rail infrequently to random specifications, generally with outsourced labor and engineering. Every single project is different, with different voltages, trainsets, tracks, on and on. Hell, we toss in diesel trains still for fun, like the Florida HSR brightline.

It's a big part why we suck at it. As an example, the east coast Amtrak line that runs through NYC/Boston/etc has like 3 different voltages. The "single line" is actually 3 lines, with one of them nearly 100 years old with constant maintenance issues. They have been trying to replace it for decades, but we never fully fund it enough to do so.

We are just doing this the stupid way possible.

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago

We suck at it because the auto lobby wants us to suck at it. We could do what China is doing if we told the auto makers to stuff it and started building

[-] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

The problem with the buildout of Chinese high speed rail, that the US won't really have should it start investing into it, is that China already had a very robust passenger rail system

They WAY overbuilt their high speed system, and now tons of lines are hemorrhaging money because people are opting for the slower, but significantly cheaper, traditional rail system that the high speed one has to compete against

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

And those pesky environmental impact reports

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 56 points 2 months ago

The US does? The black neighborhoods they destroyed to build highways would like to speak to you

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 83 points 2 months ago

I hope people realize that the issue isn’t musk but California’s reliance on the private sector to do public good.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

It gets worse, for the national HSR they've doubled down with a privatized high-end train line (think first class, private lobbies for premium etc) with a horrible "track" record in Florida.

Dubbed the deadliest train per mile in America by the Associated Press, Brightline has killed dozens of people (link)

New York-based Fortress Investment Group, which owns Brightline via its Florida East Coast Industries (FECI) unit, has pursued a strategy of mixing its infrastructure play with large-scale, real estate investments. Coral Gables-based FECI has developed multifamily and office buildings near Brightline stations and sold most of these projects to institutional investors at nine-figure prices. It also has a sizable portfolio of land and real estate holdings along the train line.... “I think Brightline was a real estate play. I think it always has been,” said Bradley Arendt (link)

So a deadly company that refuses safety precautions (forced the government to fund further safety regulations), and is managed and owned by huge financial companies that own the real estate making their own government funded mini-monopoly rail line and estates! Oh yeah, they're way over budget and losing money fast, but if they can just get that sweet "build back America" funding they can squeeze the company for a few more years before the high priced investors can cut ties and run with their profits.

I could go on for days probably talking about Brightline, might have to do a complete write up one of these days to show how nasty and deep all the crap goes with our politics and influences. Just make it a national service, this "private" sector for public utilities has got to be moved on from.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] john89@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Both. It's both.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 58 points 2 months ago

Fuck Elon Musk. He's a piece of shit that has damaged the fabric of our society.

[-] Avg@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Maybe republicans are right about immigrants /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anachronist@midwest.social 42 points 2 months ago

Union Pacific's profits over the last 20 years would have paid for a high speed rail line from Chicago to Los Angeles

The existence of that entity as a private owner of critical American infrastructure, which uses it to extract rents from the American economy, has cost us at least one trans-continental high speed rail line worth of value.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] john89@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 months ago

The cult of musk is fucking disgusting.

It's abhorrent how much influence he has on public decisions.

[-] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

The man is a monster and his sycophantic followers are incapable of critical thought.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] st33lb0ne@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

I wonder what vehicle Americans have to use because of lack of high speed rail..

Could this be to keep everyone car dependent?

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I wonder if that Musk fellow has a vested interest in car sales or something. Maybe he has ties to some sort of car company. 🤔

[-] Osito@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I sure hope he doesn't have a media company that spreads lies about political topics to further his own personal agenda

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Go figure, a billionaire killing the competition in order to make more money.

And there’s a segment of society that thinks billionaires should essentially get dictatorial powers because they “earned it” and they have good business sense.

[-] anachronist@midwest.social 28 points 2 months ago

I'm not even mad at Elon. He came up with a clownishly absurd idea and the media bought it. He literally described it as "an air hockey table in a vacuum tube" while laughing, and the media just went ahead and ate his ass anyway.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago

Hyperloop was all about trying to get legislators to cancel plans for high-speed rail in California—even though he had no plans to build it.

Nah, I'm mad at Elon

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

In hindsight, CA lawmakers should have known not to trust the guy that owns a car company, when taking advice to shut down a massive public transportation project.

[-] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

The California high speed rail project is still being built, legislators didn't shut it down. Check out the spring 2024 update.

Now it probably should be faster, but progress is being made.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mayo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I'm not going to promote a 'china is better' post because that's one of the reasons I don't like it here. I don't want to hear it. China is not a role model.

[-] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Serious question: Aside from the obvious reasons (oil and car lobby), what is preventing the US from adopting and building high speed rail infrastructure? I would much rather take a 4 hour trip on a comfortable train than my cramp Acura.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

"That's communism!"

No, really.

For example, Minnesota (and to a lesser extent Wisconsin) keeps planning light rail/high speed rail projects but they keep getting killed by Republicans who take office. Why do they kill it? Mostly i don't think they say, or make some vague claims about "budget" (while providing no actual explanation or justification). However, if you listen to their base it's because they believe trains are communist and communism is bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
  • Having to buy out private land owners who will take the government to court which can take years to decades to figure out
  • Having to do environmental assessment of all the land that will be impacted by the high speed rail then having to re plan the route to avoid sensitive areas and wildlife which would take years if not decades to complete
  • Having to raise taxes or shift infrastructure funding to build the rail line
  • Contracting out the work to private companies that will inevitably raise costs dramatically because it's a government project
  • Having to negotiate with state and local governments that will want (or not want) the rail line to go through their town, city and state.
  • If the route is going through a mountainous region having to build massive tunnels (not unheard of just more money and longer build time)
  • Contracting out companies to build the rail cars specifically and having them work closely and accurately with the companies building the rail lines.
  • If the rail line is going through Texas and is going to use electricity then the government will have to negotiate with the Texas electrical grid, probably demand that they do a better job of keeping it online.
  • Promoting the rail line enough so that it gets used more
  • Dealing with oil, gas, automotive, and airline lobbies along with all the secondary and tertiary companies and industries that rely on those industries that will lobby to keep it from going through.

This is all just stuff that came off the top of my head. I don't know if it is all valid or not.

Don't get me wrong I would fucking love to have a extensive, reliable high speed rail in the US I just don't think it will happen without huge push from the voters and I'm skeptical that will happen.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Can't have nice things for poor people.

Rich people will just fly everywhere.

[-] Communist_Synthesizer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I lived in Korea for a while and the biggest difference is how our cities are set up from the get go.

Korean cities are dense. NY dense. Buildings generally go up instead of out. Shops on the base floors, but also a lot of commercial buildings with 5+ levels of shops.

You generally don't have to walk more than a mile in any direction to get anything you need at any hour of the day, even in smaller satellite cities. There's usually at least a corner shop or two within a few hundred feet of your apartment entrance.

Subways are generally within a 10~15 minute walk. That connects you to anywhere in the greater Seoul area. Cabs are plentiful, you can hail one down on any major street in minutes if not seconds if you're in a hurry. The cities are designed around walking. Wide sidewalks, overpasses everywhere, and the density makes it so anywhere you go feels a bit like walking in an outdoor shopping mall would in the US. You can't walk more than a quarter mile without hitting another cluster of shops.

The area I lived in probably had a 100+ shops in a 2 mile(?) radius and it was a smaller city in the outskirts of Seoul called Buchun. Everything from smaller corner stores to chain restaurants & Korean versions of multi-story Walmart/Costco etc. I'm guesstimating a bit, but I never walked longer than 30 minutes to get to anything I needed.

Sure, you can drive, but walking works just fine. No one NEEDS a car if you live in a city in Korea.

The high speed rails just complements all this infrastructure to connect the cities. We don't have any of the other stuff necessary to really make this work the same way. That last mile is the killer. If you need to drive to the rail, ride it, get off and find another car to your final destination, most folks would just opt to drive the whole way. Especially if you also factor in the return trip, or the need any degree of flexibility.

In the US, high speed rail would almost function like a plane. In Asia, it's more like... one part of a comprehensive public transportation system.

I live in Austin in one of the expensive areas considered to be 'walkable', but the closest bagel shop from my house is still a 10 minute walk away. If I want to get to the breakfast place I like, it's 20 minutes from my front door. Only thing I pass in between those two are a bunch of tattoos shops and I think a yoga studio, and some architect firm. Oh, I guess we have a few food trucks now too. They're usually closed in the mornings when I walk anywhere.

The rest of it is just houses. If I wanted to get to the downtown rail station, it's a 30 minute walk and I have to walk under the highway and get accosted by homeless folks on occasion. (Most of them are cool, there's a few that are not).

Oh, and there's no shade anywhere and it's Texas. Five months out of the year we hit 90~100+ degrees and you'd need a change of clothes by the time you get anywhere you're going.

American cities are just not designed for it. We have everything spaced too far apart.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Projects intended for the public good don’t need to be profitable. It is disingenuous to argue that High Speed Rail is profitable in China, nor can you make the assumption that it could be profitable in other markets.

There are a lot of conflicting reports on how profitable HSR is in China, the fact that government and Industry are often one in the same and the lack of good public accounting at Chinese companies makes any reports from HSR advocates out of china questionable. After all they do want to sell their HSR technology globally.

HSR is much more difficult in the US as the rights of private property are respected and projects need to pass a much higher threshold of review for environmental impact, etc. There are many major infrastructure projects in China that turn out to be poorly planned and executed years after they have been completed.

[-] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago

It is disingenuous to argue that High Speed Rail is profitable in China

Good thing that's not what OP or anyone else in here was arguing. Like you said, it's a public good. It doesn't need to be profitable to serve the public interest. In fact, profits run counter to the public interest. So why bring it up?

HSR is much more difficult in the US as the rights of private property are respected and projects need to pass a much higher threshold of review

We have eminent domain, and HSR has been built in Europe despite stricter envirobmental regulations.

There are many major infrastructure projects in China that turn out to be poorly planned and executed years after they have been completed.

Wow. Couldn't happen in the US. Never.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It is disingenuous to argue that High Speed Rail is profitable in China

High efficiency public infrastructure doesn't add economic value because it won't show up on China's domestic ledger as "profit for shareholders". You heard it here first.

government and Industry are often one in the same and the lack of good public accounting at Chinese companies makes any reports from HSR advocates out of china questionable

Yes, we have data to argue there is an economic benefit, but DON'T TRUST IT! Everything good you read about China is a lie and everything bad you read about China is a ten times worse.

HSR is much more difficult in the US as the rights of private property are respected

LO-fucking-L.

And that's just the modern stuff. Google "Robert Moses" if you really want to get a taste for American style private property protections.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Search Thunderf00t on YouTube. Researched and sourced refutation of each of musk's many and always evolving lies, from an actual physicist with a PhD.

[-] Strawberry 15 points 2 months ago

thunderf00t is a raging misogynist. Like he made hundreds of gamergate videos obsessing over this one woman for daring to criticize the portrayal of women in videogames

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Adam Something does a good job of savaging Musk's bullshit as well, along with lots of other "tech bro" bullshit in the same vein (and no misogyny that I'm aware of). He does talk a bit too fast, however, so I always slow his videos down a bit and they come out alright.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Moah 9 points 2 months ago

Add it I needed more reasons to hate him

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I wouldn't trust China to build that stuff. Have you seen what they use as construction materials of their buildings? They're basically styrofoam and flour.

You can destroy a house with your bare hands.

https://youtu.be/oWDty6iNcgA?si=UUE584pvGwwo2ckK

[-] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

i wouldn't trust USA to build train rails. have you seen how many derailments and bridge collapses they got?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

Their HSR has been running a decade at this point, with a better safety record than the US. You don't have to 'trust' them to do anything, it's already done.

Yeah the ghost cities are shit, but that's an entirely different topic

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Dear Mr Musk,

Where is my hyperloop, you lying fucken cunt!

Yours sincerely,

Everyone

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Lionheadbud@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I've been on the high speed line from Shanghai, it's fantastic. Covered 700km in around 2 hours with beautiful views of the landscape. The ride was comfortable and relaxing.

I've also been on the Shanghai Maglev, which I believe at the time and maybe still is the fastest passenger train in the world. It was pretty amazing flying over the motorway. It goes between Pudong airport and Shanghai city centre in about 10 minutes. I felt slightly nauseous during the acceleration.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

China would be such a nice place to live if it wasn't such a bad place to live

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It puts a fine point on it, doesn’t it?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
1083 points (100.0% liked)

Amtrak

284 readers
1 users here now

Anything Amtrak related. News, photos, questions, and more. We are not associated with Amtrak in any way, official inquiries should be referred to Amtrak.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS