486
submitted 4 months ago by tranarchist@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago
[-] gnutrino@programming.dev 100 points 4 months ago

Italy's taking the picture

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 78 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Milei, Meloni, and Orban already ran by the cameraman.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

right? I was like... these guys are only aspiring to fascism, where's Orban?

[-] tranarchist@lemmy.ml 37 points 4 months ago

they already are fascist, so no reason for them to run towards it, also they're included in the EU

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

also they're included in the EU

So's Germany, France, and ~~Latvia~~ Austria. AKA everyone pictured except the US.

[-] tranarchist@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 months ago

tbh I was just too lazy to insert every european flag, so I just put the EU one there and the countries I know some politicsl shit about

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

That's fair 😁

[-] EherNicht@feddit.org 12 points 4 months ago

Italy should actually be in the front

[-] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 60 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I think calling everyone a fascist would just water down the impact of the fascist world just like the far right- or far left-wing words which nowadays are just used on more left/right parties but are kinda not close on their agenda like the 20th century parties were where these definitons came from.

But educate me if some of these countries have parties which really apply most general aspects of the fascism movement

[-] tranarchist@lemmy.ml 76 points 4 months ago

the guy running for chancellor in Austria (Herbert Kickl) is calling himself "Volkskanzler", guess who also called himself that? fucking Hitler. so no, I don't think I'm over reacting

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 9 points 4 months ago

I'm calling myself human - you know who did that too? Fucking Ted.

[-] tranarchist@lemmy.ml 55 points 4 months ago

everyone calls themself human, not everyone calls themself Führer, Reichskanzler, Volkskanzler, etc.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Now what is a Volkskanzler? In itself it should be a Kanzler, so a part of a democratic government, for the Volk, so the people. And I never actually heard about Hitler calling himself that, only that he was the Reichskanzler, Führer etc.

Edit:

After the end of the dictatorship, the original meaning was transferred both directly and indirectly to well-known democratic state politicians such as Ludwig Erhard and Bruno Kreisky.

So those democratic politicians are Hitlers too now?

[-] tranarchist@lemmy.ml 24 points 4 months ago

no, they aren't, because they were leftists trying to reclaim the word so they obviosly weren't nazis, the people using it nowdays are far right, so it's not really obvios wether they are nazis or not.

[-] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

Wow dayum that definitely seem really sus.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

For people like me, that's "People's Chancellor".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sop 50 points 4 months ago

Wanting to ban mosques, the quran and muslim clothing like niqabs sounds pretty fascist to me (that’s what the biggest political party in The Netherlands wants). Thinking the European far right (that is rapidly gaining grounds) isn’t fascist or fascist leaning is a wild take.

[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 11 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately most leftist parties in Europe suffer from the paradox of tolerance. And rightists are hypocritical in opposing Islam but supporting Christianity. There's nobody anti-islamic who's not a fascist, which is ironic since in some ways they are quite similar, and both are harmful to humanity.

(And to make it clear before you accuse me of being fascist, I oppose the currently dominant version of Islam which is not separable from politics, and which insists on actual belief in god and quran. Once it becomes a weakly held cultural category like Christianity in most of Europe I'll be fine with it)

[-] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 months ago

"There's nobody anti-islamic who's not a fascis"

I'm sorry but you can be violently anti-religion without being a fascist. Considering religions for what they are - a way to dominate the people by fear anddesinformation - does not mean that you are going to prevent people from practicing their religion. You are just making damn sure they don't advocate them in public schools, hospitals and administrations.

[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I’m sorry but you can be violently anti-religion without being a fascist.

Yes, that was exactly my point. I'm complaining that in the current political scene there are no parties that separate those ideas.
And yes, banning the public display will only make it go underground and become stronger, this is why it's so important to separate anti-religion from fascism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sop 7 points 4 months ago

Where in Europe do you consider islam to be more than a ‘cultural category like Christianity’? Most European countries have large Christian conservative political parties that are preventing trans people from getting the medical care they need and women from having ownership of their bodies when they’re pregnant.

As a trans person fundamentalist Christians are a much bigger threat to me than fundamentalist muslims. I experience solidarity from muslims who know what it’s like to be marginalised and discriminated against. There are muslim people who would like to restrict my determination over my own body, but there are way more Christians in my country who would like to do the same and they pose and actual threat to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 4 months ago

A few of the AFD highlights

Member of the Bundestag suggested to shoot every migrant at the border.

Another one claimed not every SS member was a bad person. Which lost them the support of French and Italian fascist.

Leader of the party in Thüringen, a history teacher, used a slogan of the SA.

There is many more...

[-] pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io 10 points 4 months ago

Yeah. Scary stuff. I live in central Berlin, and it's pretty relaxed here. Did the Mauerlauf last weekend and immediately when you cross the Brandenburg border to some of these villages, they're full of AfD advertisement. Berlin is definitely the Portland of Germany :D

[-] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago

You've won. Certified fascistmaxxers there.

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago

Germany definitely counts. The AfD is above 20%, in some states they might even govern alone. They probably will be part of the next government after the next election and they definitely are fascist.

[-] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago

It's mind boggling how a suspiciously nazi friendly party can get so many votes. Doesn't Germany have some serious anti-nazi laws written into it's constitution, or is that treated like a joke too like in Hungary?

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago

Nazi symbolism is forbidden and some slogans. One of the leaders of AfD was recently fined for using one such slogan. The secret service tasked with protecting the constitution (Verfassungsschutz) is watching the AfD and a mechanism to outlaw the party is currently worked on. We need to wait for the repost of this secret service to really start the mechanism. Once started it is estimated to need at least 4 years to get a result. So even if successfull the AfD will be in the government in a lot of states till then and possibly be in the federal government.

Germany is slow when it comes to prosecuting the far right. Usually when there are big protests against the far right the police distracts from them by arresting former member of the far left terror organization RAF which has been inactice for decades.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Germany sold everyone the myth of denazification, while in some cases it was even more nazification, look at the articles liked in this comment for example.

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Pretty sure the first order of business is going to be to remove those laws.

[-] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 14 points 4 months ago

Many are populist parties, with the feeling that fascism is just waiting behind a hidden corner.

[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

Not even slightly hidden

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago

if calling it what it is waters it down so be it

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

"if using a word improperly muddies it's definition, so be it"

Are you anti dictionary or something?

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

the fact you are in denial doesnt make the latest fascist wave any less fascist.

[-] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

An example, a Dutch minister for the biggest party (PVV, in my opinion (very close to being) a fascist party) was an active member on an internet forum called Stormfront which is known to be a forum for neo-nazis

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MSugarhill@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 months ago

We are allowed by court to call members of the FPÖ Kellernazis (people who are secretly Nazis when drinking with their buddies under the cellar) the FPÖ will most likely be the strongest party after the next Nationalrats election on September 29th. They will have something between 30 to 35% which is pretty strong. They have actual plans in their program to overthrow governments via referendum of the public and other things. So yes, it fits.

[-] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago

They are expected to have between 25 and 30 percent*

And usually prognosises tend to value them higher than they end up, so I guess we can expect them to get around 25%. Plenty of space for other parties to form a coalition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

This started with “the war on terror.” And then any time there was anything someone didn’t like, it was “terrorism.”

[-] Samvega 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There is no careful use of language that can stop people from preferring hatred. Humans are machines for making the world worse, and they will continue to do so, and while they do it they will rationalise doing it, and while people get hurt (including themselves) they will blame the victims.

"It's not fascism!" they complain as minorities are scapegoated and children die. Just get used to the fact that anything that is pointed entirely towards harming people for fun and profit is going to attract a range of derogatory words, and maybe think about how to stop humans from hurting humans instead.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago

Humans are machines for making the world worse

This sounds like fatalistic capitalist/imperialist realism.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

"Bolsonarismo" in Brazil has an uncanny resemblance to fascism

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 35 points 4 months ago

democratic is a bit of a stretch though

[-] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 5 points 4 months ago

For the USA, yes, but there are other countries too where democracy still kinda works

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

What kind of ship?

[-] Cryan24@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yeah but ours is "good fascism" 😆

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
486 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45901 readers
1080 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS