626
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Trump’s campaign also tried to use Beyonce’s “Freedom,” but stopped when she threatened to sue

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 73 points 2 months ago

The song is "Rockin' in the Free World". Hopefully Young asked Walz, "are you sure you want to use that one?"

There’s colors on the street
Red, white, and blue
People shuffling their feet
People sleeping in their shoes
There’s a warning sign on the road ahead
There’s a lot of people saying we’d be better off dead
Don’t feel like Satan, but I am to them
So I try to forget it any way I can

[Chorus]

I see a woman in the night
With a baby in her hand
There's an old street light
Near a garbage can
Now she put the kid away and she’s gone to get a hit
She hates her life and what she’s done to it
There’s one more kid that’ll never go to school
Never get to fall in love, never get to be cool

[Chorus]

We got a thousand points of light
For the homeless man
We got a kinder, gentler machine gun hand
We've got department stores and toilet paper
Got styrofoam boxes for the ozone layer
Got a man of the people says keep hope alive
Got fuel to burn, got roads to drive

[Chorus]

[-] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 98 points 2 months ago

It actually makes sense as a campaigning song to me as long as your platform is about trying to address the social problems the song is highlighting.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 64 points 2 months ago

I guarantee Walz knows what it's about, and he chose it for that reason.

Hes one smaht cookie, kid.

[-] zelifcam@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

Holy fucking shit! He's on a different level now!

Grateful Dead moccasins!

[-] AltheaHunter 1 points 2 months ago

Just a reminder that Ann Coulter and Tucker fucking Carlson are "deadheads" too. Walz is great and I think he gets it, but the evidence of that is what he's done not the band merch he wears.

[-] zelifcam@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

This thread is about whether or not Walz was aware of the lyrics of a Neil Young song. Being a fan of The Grateful Dead added to the discussion.

Walz seems like a respectable person. We will see how that plays out. Charles Manson and Mark Chapman were obsessed with Beatles, but I don’t associate them to everyone else who enjoys their music. So I’m not really clear on the point being made here.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Wicked smaht,

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

I find it incredibly unlikely that he's going to enter into a conversation on American failures and cruelty as a VP candidate for the party currently in the White House.

But I would be damned impressed if he ended up coming out to "we got a thousand points of light for the homeless man, we got a kinder, gentler machine gun hand" rather than the chorus. Worried, but impressed.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

WHERE IS MY TOILET PAPER?

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

Many people don't listen to the main lyrics or understand the meaning of songs, but just like the chorus.

"Born in the USA" is another example.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Or Paul Ryan and anything by RAtM.

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

a team is one your comment just reminded me of, thanks.

And some mandatory songs that always came up that my memory serves... semi charmed life by third eye blind, hey ya by outcast, every breath you take by the police, escape (Pina colada song) by Rupert Holmes, macarena ...

Ok I got bored trying to remember them all if anyone wants to add ..

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

"Hook" by Blues Traveller. "Pumped Up Kicks" by Foster the People.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Which was used for NJ in the roll call. I laughed a bit.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

It's questionable there, but it's a hell of a song so they could be earnestly saying Springsteen was a NJ treasure for writing a fantastic protest song. Buuuut... they probably just liked the assumed pride of the chorus.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago
[-] Artemis@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Which is also a song by a Canadian band 😅

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

The DNC had permission for every song in the roll call. That was a major flex, and endorsement from all of those artists.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 49 points 2 months ago

Oh hey, are we returning to a time where we can all agree that Nazis are bad?

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 14 points 2 months ago

Was there ever a time where we all agreed on that?

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

When John Belushi said "I hate Illinois nazis" and drove them all into the river in The Blues Brothers, there wasn't anybody around who didn't think that was funny.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago

I'll bet the Illinois Nazis didn't find it too funny

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Won't someone please think of the Nazis?

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago

The poor Nazis will never be able to live with themselves after all this cyberbullying

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

2007....

All the "I Don't See Color!" People started to think otherwise when they realized "Oh wait, minorities are allowed to be in charge of things? Fuck it, I'm with Hitler!"

[-] Acid2688@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I'm not holding my breath.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The pendulum swings.

[-] experbia@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

been noticing the conservatives on Twitter freaking out over the music rights thing, rattling on about how "music should be for everyone". which is a hoot, because like, wait, you're telling me you want to take the property of someone else, which they invested time and money into producing, and redistribute it to all people who want it?? HMMMM that sounds like something...

I've had a few folks delete their tweets but for the most part they just ignore it or call me very stupid and evil (their go-to when they have no argument) lmao. I actually engaged one Maga musician because he was afraid of what would happen if we allowed the right's "musical socialism" discussion to continue.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

What happened to Kid Rock? The greatest celebrity there ever was

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago

He was last seen eating French Cries while being taken away in the whaaaambulance.

[-] Whirlygirl9@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 months ago

i heard they administered Crylenol

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

He couldn’t do anything of note without amphetamines and Warren Zevon

[-] BeanSwellington@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

Hey now, he's just an excitable boy.

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

“Mr. Zevon, I got an idea: Bawitdaba of London

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Independent:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/neil-young-tim-walz-song-permission-trump-b2600350.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] proper@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] BarrierWithAshes@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

Can he even sue? I thought UMG or Atlantic owned his music.

[-] bamboo 4 points 2 months ago

How can ~~s~~he ~~slap~~ sue?

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
626 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3275 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS