384
Why the fuck would people close to Diaper Dump Trump talk to the press about this?
They want to give you a false sense of security.
Vote like your world depends on it.
They also know that Trump watches a dozen hours of Fox News and CNN per day, and that that is when he is paying the most attention. They're trying to reach him where his brain lives.
I know it sounds alarmist and overblown... but Democracy itself literally depends on all of us voting.
Because he is, in fact, a loser.
The biggest loser actually.
The likes of which the world has ever seen.
Born on third base. Somehow ended up on first.
I've never heard that term, but it perfectly describes that fucking loser.
Is he acting weirder than normal? I honestly can't tell the difference.
Yeah, I've really been surprised by the amount of negative press on Trump. He seems like himself to me.
The contrast with a fully functioning non-geriatric campaign really brings to light just how shitty Trump is. Not that it wasn't obvious before but I guess louder for those in the back?
And how completely lost Biden was.
along these lines people are saying his incoherence indicates dementia - I dunno, since the first moment I ever heard of trump to 2016 to today - he's just fucking dumb. He's dumber than a bag of hammers. A box of rocks has more nuance, and a bag of shit more character, but most of all, he's just an idiot who's coasted through life on daddy's money and a toolbox of racism and contractor fuckin.
And I'm still astounded at the people he took in. Fuck, he's just so fucking dumb.
The AP news coverage of his press conference today was just a list of a dozen things he lied about, with a few paragraphs explaining each thing. It was a very journalism-like piece of writing.
What?!?! Where’s my outrage?!?!?!?
Yeah, I've really been surprised by the amount of negative press on Trump. He seems like himself to me.
Those are contradictory statements..
If I was less acceptably sane, I might think there was some sort of coordinated effort by the real Powers That Be to ensure that he does not become the next president, potentially starting with the assassination attempt, then moving to plan B by pushing Biden out so Harris takes over, and now funneling loads of positive media attention towards Harris and negative attention towards Trump when he is essentially behaving the same as he always has.
Of course, like I said, I’m too sane to believe that…right?
Apart from the assassination attempt, the rest might be more simply explained by the existence of an opposing campaign attempting to defeat him.
apparently not
He’s planning on stealing the election anyway through his acolytes in congress and various state governments, so he sees no point in spending campaign funds that he can use on himself later.
Votes are the only thing that's gonna make him lose, and we're gonna need enough votes that something like that couldn't be remotely feasible. I'm hoping no one reads all these articles and thinks there's no reason for them to vote because it's already looking like a slam dunk because it's absolutely not gonna be a slam dunk
The only way that would be possible would be if he was close and was able to swing a few key counties with fake electors. If he fumbles the bid bad enough that it's a landslide, there's no way he'll be able to get enough fake electors in place to do any damage.
He's not the president so he can't even rely on people storming the capitol, cause Biden would just send in the troops the second there was a threat.
Also, with Harris as the VP, she'll have no problem certifying herself.
This is exactly what he's doing. It's been obvious since Biden dropped out.
catharsis /kə-thär′sĭs/
noun
-
Purgation, especially for the digestive system.
-
A purifying or figurative cleansing of the emotions, especially pity and fear, described by Aristotle as an effect of tragic drama on its audience.
-
A release of emotional tension, as after an overwhelming experience, that restores or refreshes the spirit.
I'm feeling more Schadenfreude than Catharsis tbh.
Catharsis isn't the right word. Schadenfreude is for some, but the former, eh, not accurate in connotation
It's the sensation of catharsis from the world being made whole again. Up is up. down is down. Fascist clowns who brag about raping women are no longer dominating the presidential race, but are seemingly reduced to a increasingly meager side show. A black woman candidate isn't just up in the polls, but brought with her one of the most progressive vps of all time with her. Schadenfreude is only half of that sensation, because it doesn't also recognize the positive.
It's a sensation that comes from things making sense, a returning to a world where the bad are punished and the good uplifted.
Catharsis is the perfect word.
he's not chosing to lose, he is a one trick pony, and his trick doesn't work against his current opponent.
Yeah at first I thought maybe he wants out but his ego won't let him just step away from it like Biden did, so he's trying to ramp up the crazy shit to force the party to kick him out, that way he doesn't have to run but he can keep the grift going by saying he was betrayed etc.
Then I thought, he's not that smart. All he has is saying crazy shit, which seemed to befuddle Clinton and Biden but doesn't work on Harris, so all he can do is panic and say even crazier shit.
Suffer, you parasite. And when you're full on suffering, spread it to everyone who ever supported you.
it's win win
either victory and massive long-term corruption and damage to the US governmental system
or martyrdom to the conspiracy addled revolutionary far-right
Win - win when he loses the election and loses it at the same time.
Salon - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Salon:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.salon.com/2024/08/15/its-like-hes-choosing-to-lose-allies-fear-he-is-self-destructing-over-kamala-harris-surge/
So my honest bet going into this election (earlier this year) was that I'm not sure running a candidate that had already been president and then lost an election was ever going to be a good idea in a presidential election. Biden complicated things, as does Trump's cult-like dynamics, but I suspect the point will have been well made. Politicians and their relevance have lifetimes.
Don-old's entire brand is self sabotage. He only has to open his mouth to activate his super power. But he decides to try 'business' and loses casinos, steaks, water, universities, clothes, the Presidency and soon... his freedom. Forever an incompetent con man.
4D chess, y'all
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
384 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19144 readers
2297 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS