672
submitted 2 months ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/39437325

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 88 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why would someone wanting to store huge amounts of data to put it on a storage device that is the most fragile/short lived?

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 97 points 2 months ago

short term storage of uncompressed high resolution data

[-] Krzd@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

I don't think microSD has the write speed for that, might be more useful for HD surveillance cameras

[-] frezik@midwest.social 34 points 2 months ago

Uncompressed 4k stream @ 30fps and 24bpp would be 5.7 GB/s. The top regular SD card speed, UHS-III, maxes at 0.6 GB/s. SD Express, where a PCIe lane is added, goes to 3.9 GB/s.

So, yeah, going to need at least some compression. Good news is that just a little compression can go a long way.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 20 points 2 months ago

Even full 4K HDR Blu-ray rips come in at about 30GB an hour.

That's 500MB per minute which just about fits in the 10MB/s of UHS Class 1.

I would consider those fairly standard these days. You'd have to have picked an extra shitty AliExpress special to not have your card meet that.

[-] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 2 months ago

Games, the easiest way to expand the storage on a Steam Deck is a micro sd card.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why would anyone need a 24TB HDD?
Because in the time we have gone from 4GB SD cards to 4TB cards, movies have gone from being 700MB to 70Gb, and games from coming on a few cds or dvds to requiring a mountain of them - Baldurs Gate 1 came on 5 CDs, BG3 would require around 200 of them.

That 4TB card has only space for 26 games, if they are as large as BG3.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 months ago

ah finally, i can buy a micro sd card for 500 dollars, the same price as a gazillion terabyte harddrive, and get less reliability out of it.

[-] aesopjah@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago

yeah, but you can carry it with you at all times if your phone takes an SD card.

although, can they use one that large, or is there some restriction?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

All I want is higher resiliency SD cards. It must be a technology limitation with being unable to fit a good controller in there or something because I would gladly sacrifice speed and capacity for something reliable in a lot of my applications.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sparky 39 points 2 months ago

Sigh...

A couple of years ago there were discussions on how stupid 20+tb harddrives were, mainly because they are so slow that the time it takes for files to transfer to a spinning disk was too long.

Let's say you have a good 20tb drive and it can transfer files at 200MB/s. To fill that drive, it'll take 1 day and 8 hours of continuous transfer. If it's failing, and you're trying to get as much off of it you're screwed.

Now let's think about that micro SD card. It's 4tb, and let's be gracious and give it a v90 speed class. That's 90MB/s. Looking at a calculation for the time it takes to fill it up, we're sitting at about 14h and 14 minutes. Worst part is that SD cards don't have SMART, meaning you don't know when they'll die.

From my experience, even good SD cards die in my raspberry pi running pihole, and the cards runs idle almost all the time.

Also there's this thing that the higher capacity a storage device gets, the more valueable the data stored on it becomes, not directly because it's high capacity, but because it's more trusted by the user.

Guys, gals and anyone in between, please get a proper storage solution, something that won't fail spontaneously. If you need that kind of capacity, go for a Nas with spare drives, or at least get an ssd.

/end rant

[-] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not all use-cases require a high speed:capacity ratio.

I mean, I have an 18TB USB hard drive, which sustains transfer at about 50MB/sec in practice. It is nearly full, and its level of performance has never been a show-stopping problem.

It's hard to imagine a use case where a NAS would be a viable alternative to an SD card.

[-] Sparky 15 points 2 months ago

I've had a usage tier for storage that looks like this

Temporary storage

  • SD cards - unreliable storage you use temporarily to store pictures and videos before inevitably moving them to a more reliable and permanent solution.
  • USB drives (hdd ssd etc) - used for when you you want to move files faster or more conveniently than over a Lan.

Permanent storage

  • Nas, internal drives, tape drives, etc - for when you want to store a lot of data with configurations that allow you to use redundancy.

The issue with super high capacity SD cards for me is that they're still fragile and prone to failure. When you allow someone to store that much data, it'll be used as a more permanent medium, and since it has a lot of storage capacity you end up with a bigger data loss when it dies. Imo having 30 128gb SD cards would be better because if one dies or breaks, you lose 128gb and not 4tb.

Tldr I think 4tb micro sd cards are stupid.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

This is obviously not for large scale storage. But for stuff like cameras, which uses ever larger files for raw images

[-] Sparky 11 points 2 months ago

I totally get that.. Here's the thing though, at least in Norway a 1tb micro sd card costs 2200kr (~$203). If we extrapolate the price for a 4tb one, that'll be 8800kr(~$813). If you or a company has the kind of money to spend almost a grand on a storage device, doesn't that mean that the footage/photos are pretty valuable? If you had the kind of money/were going to record super valuable footage, wouldn't you work hard to use cameras/recording systems that were capable of recording to redundant drives?

What I don't get is what market section this product would even fit in. It's too expensive for regular consumers, and also has terrible value. It's not good enough for professional settings because it has no drive monitoring, nor does it have redundancy. It isn't fast enough for the kind of footage that would require that kind of space(unless you're recording a month long realtime video).

Also imagine how horrible the transfer speeds would be for individual photos when the os has to initiate a file transfer. If we say each photo is 20mb, that's almost 200k photos. Yikes....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Visstix@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I am slightly confused why they use UHS-I instead of UHS-II (or even UHS-III) for such a big capacity. Seems like people needing so much capacity probably write a lot of data in a short time. UHS-II is 3 times quicker.

Then again maybe they are aiming for devices that can't even run UHS-II

[-] kn33@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago

Could be a trade-off issue. They can get capacity or speed but not both yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kytta@feddit.org 22 points 2 months ago

I can imagine this being useful for cases where you write a lot of data over a longer time period. Think CCTV (with low-medium resolution). You can keep a sizeable archive locally and never have to swap cards

[-] Visstix@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Oh yeah cctv could be a good option indeed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 33 points 2 months ago

I paid $100 for a massive 1TB hard drive when they first came out years ago. Thought a TB was essentially unlimited and wasn't sure if it could ever be used.

What a crazy advancement to get to 8TB the size of your pinky nail.

[-] fartnuggetsupreme@startrek.website 13 points 2 months ago

I paid like $150 for a 1GB hard drive on my Toshiba Tecra 510CDT back in the 90s. The guys at the computer store weren't sure if it would even work.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

and both are described as SDUC UHS-I cards that are “built for tomorrow’s smartphones, gaming devices, drones, cameras, and laptops.”

Gaming devices: ✅️
Drones: ✅️
Cameras: ✅️
Smartphones: ❌️

Basically every current flagship phone, and you know that's what they mean, has done away with expandable memory....

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

Which is utter bullshit. Especially since a lot of lower end phones have the option for dual sim or one sim and sd. There is literally no reason for flagships to not have that and make file transfering easier.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago

This is the kind of discussion i'm here for. Thanks everyone! I didn't know SD and micro SD cards where this unreliable but i always use them for short term stuff or content that is backed up somewhere else so i think i'm good.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They aren't that unreliable FWIW. Obviously, it should not be your only copy of media, but I have microSD cards that are still readable with data intact even 10, 11, or more years later.

If you buy quality microSD cards, expect them to last a long time.

[-] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

I feel it's worth mentioning the application of them also factors into their longevity.

Good quality SD card holding some documents and random files? Yeah probably 10+ years. Good quality SD card being used in a dashcam, constant writes? I'm replacing my good SD card after about ~2 years of service because its showing signs of failure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 24 points 2 months ago

SDUC supports up to one hundred and twenty eight Terabytes O.o

Who in the world requires so much Storage on a tiny SD card?!

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 82 points 2 months ago
[-] BennyInc@feddit.org 43 points 2 months ago
[-] palordrolap@kbin.run 21 points 2 months ago

“I’ve said some stupid things and some wrong things, but not that." -- an actual Bill Gates quote referring to the 640k quote that won't die.

But yes, it was probably satirically ascribed to him because of MS-DOS not having the capability to deal with any more than that amount of RAM for a lot longer than it probably should have.

The "temporary" solution of requiring an extra driver to be able to do so (EMM386.SYS or similar) remained in place right up until DOS-based Windows was allowed to die.

(The underlying reason was almost certainly ancient IBM PC memory-mapped IO standards, so maybe we could ascribe the original quote an engineer working there some time around 1980.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 14 points 2 months ago

I want all my music on my phone, not just a pithy 80,000 songs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 11 points 2 months ago

node_modules

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Just need to set them up in a raid configuration for redundancy.

[-] dtrain@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Redunda-what?

The only RAID is Zero.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aztechnology@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Def means my next phone I'm buying I make sure has a micro SD slot...

I love emulation on my phone as a hobby and his is hitting the sweet spot where by the time I need to upgrade again in a few years everything up through PS2 generation should be full speed even on mid tier phones that typically still offer micro SD

And 8 tb of micro SD is enough space to carry literally entire romsets for every system I like besides PS2/GameCube which is fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HEXN3T 13 points 2 months ago

Didn't we only just start getting 2TB microSD?

[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

At this size you could carry your backup with you all the time or store it in your car encrypted.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
672 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58691 readers
3236 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS