981
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by willsenior@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
  • His disclosures, both from his final year in Congress and his time as Minnesota governor, also show no mutual funds, bonds, private equities, or other securities.
  • No book deals or speaking fees or crypto or racehorse interests.
  • Not even real estate. The couple sold their Mankato, Minnesota, home after moving into the governor's mansion, for below the $315k asking price).
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 199 points 3 months ago

That's insane.

Like, no 401k or Roth IRA? Dang. I'm fuckin hard.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 215 points 3 months ago

Their only investment assets appear to be via state pensions, including teacher pensions.

He also retired from the Army, and likely has a pension from that too.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 135 points 3 months ago

If I could retire without needing to know the difference between ETFs and mutual funds, I would be soooo happy

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

If you're under 42 you can always grease the gears of war and join the military. Fat pension and great healthcare!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stinerman@midwest.social 58 points 3 months ago

I'm shocked he doesn't have an IRA (unless that doesn't count). Given his previous jobs, it passes the smell test that he doesn't have a 401k.

I'm sure his pensions are invested in a wide range of stocks and bonds, but he doesn't directly hold them.

[-] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago

And pension funds are generally invested broadly enough that the only way a politician could "game" them is to just improve the economy as a whole. Which is like, one of the main things people want their elected officials to do.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Military/feds have TSP, it's essentially a 401k.

If he was 20+ years military reserve he's got a lot in there. I think he started in 1981 tho. And I'm not 100% sure how long tsp has been happening

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago

Not having retirement savings of some kind would be...not great.

But as someone else said, if he has military pension, that may be good enough.

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 42 points 3 months ago
[-] Tom_Hanx_the_Actor@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And military pension.

edit I totally spaced on the orginal comment mentioning the military pension. No regrets.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

He did 20 some years in the reserves or guard.

That means he has tsp money, it's the government 401k essentially.

I mean, he might not, but it's incredibly rare not to have tsp especially after 20+ years of service.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 months ago

He's just like us 🥺

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Hazzia@infosec.pub 156 points 3 months ago

Okay yeah I'm super happy that Harris replaced Biden on the ticket and everything, but the more I learn about this guy the more I want him to be actual president. VP's certainly a good compromise for the circunstances though!

[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 123 points 3 months ago

Everybody in MN has been saying Walz needs to run for president for years now. But, being a relatively unknown guy from a flyover state it was kind of a pipe dream. I'm hoping now that everyone is seeing him, getting to know him, and obviously loving him that he'll get his chance in 4 years to run for actual president.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago

Give Harris two terms to cook, but I otherwise I'm on board. The guy seems awesome.

[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

By that time he'll be 69. I know that's not unpresidented ~(fully intended)~ but I'd still rather see him as president before he's fully geriatric.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Hopefully she'll win. When she does, it's highly likely it'll be for 8.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

If Dems win the I feel like Republicans are gonna have a period of recalibration as they move away from maga politics.

One can hope at least.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

I figured so when they lost in 2008, but they doubled (quadrupled) down on the party shit and stuff in 2016 and won.

I have absolutely no expectations they'll start getting introspective and sane.

Which is a shame, having a sane, working-in-good-faith opposition party is - generally - a very good thing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

As WE force them away from MAGA politics. Make no mistake, in a few months we'll have more work to do. POTUS is the first step.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

And a great resume builder for the Democrat candidate after harris down the line.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago

I mean, Kamala was Joe's VP, and Joe was Barack's VP...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] norimee@lemmy.world 111 points 3 months ago

Wow. Does that mean politics is his main job? Like full time?

I didn't knew the US still has politicians like that. Most of the other clowns there seem like they treat politics as a minor side hassle.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 93 points 3 months ago

I looked at his open secrets page, and his biggest contributes are like 5k, and an association of orthopedic surgeons was at the top of the list.

I'm honestly still shocked we got someone this "clean"

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

I know this is me being unhinged, but when they're that clean, I get stuck on wondering what they might be hiding. I think I'm broken, I can't accept the possibility that he might just be a good dude.

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 24 points 3 months ago

This fucked up world breeds cynicism just as easily as it does sociopaths.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

He did speak at an AIPAC conference, but that was like 2010 or 2011.

And while he was a little to pro-Israel at first, he's changed course somewhat. And publicly commented on the "uncommitted" protest vote in his state and said it's a sign that we need to listen to voters.

And hell, after Biden just being open to a dialog makes this guy seem amazing.

Still happy to have him on the ticket. But even if it was Bernie/AOC, I'd still criticize them, if the only pressure on Dems is to go to the right, we can't blame anyone else when the party keeps going right

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 71 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Expect the corporate media to go hard against him using the "sochalist" attacks because he's already proven he can't be bought and that scares the shit out of the billionaire ruling class.

[-] FrozenH@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago

They are saying he isn't investing in "America"

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago

He can flat out tell them that those companies aren't investing in America.

They all cry about paying taxes, they move their headquarters to "tax haven" countries as soon as they can. If the local gov't tries to get them to pay their fair share they will move the entire company and put all their workers out of a job.

They gleefully pollute the land. They do everything possible to get out of paying workers, or paying benefits.

They get laws passed so they can fire their workers without reason.

They hire workers from other countries to replace American workers and pay those workers a tiny fraction of what they pay American workers and make their American workers bend over backwards when the work is sub par.

Who is investing in America now?

Investing in America would mean sending each and every exec to jail for life when their inevitable actions are detrimental to America and those who call it their home.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 70 points 3 months ago

How can we trust him to look out for the interests of the capitalist class?

[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

The republicans at a loss on how to attack this guy and he is just rolling them and their ideas. Kamala must be thrilled.

[-] Marighost@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago

Vance is attempting to attack him for "stolen valor," implying Walz retired from his 20 year service (as a Sergeant Major) just before the war in Iraq happened, calling Walz a coward.

Let's ask Donald Trump where he was when the US issued the draft for Vietnam.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

On one hand that’s good. On the other hand that’s a concerning approach to financial management

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

It's gonna shock you to find out he's a huge proponent of sharing wealth and not hoarding it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 3 months ago

Why? I assume he’s got money in the bank and will have a government pension.

Some people don’t need to hoard as much wealth as possible, if he’s got enough to live comfortably with his family I don’t see the need to hold a ton of investments.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sgtgig@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

He's completely set with pensions. And I am unsure if index funds were specifically ruled out. The article doesn't really detail his wealth, and there's no way someone with his intelligence and pragmatism has completely bungled his finances.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This guy is doing a great job of making everyone realize just how fucking weird the cons truly are.

And I'm loving every minute of that. I've been calling them creepy weirdos for years - after hearing it said on The Professional Left.

I'm glad this guy is taking it to the national level. The Republicans are getting weirder and weirder by the minute and it's about high time someone with a big platform started pointing out what is so obvious to so many people.

How much time have they spent on attacking a woman from a country they probably couldn't find on a map and that is in a sport they now have to suddenly pretend to care about (do they truly care about any women's sports, if we are being honest?). Way to go, guys. People call you weird and you and get even fucking weirder. 🤣

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago

I like the guy but isn't the Occams Razor answer that the guy making $127k/year with no mortgage DOES have investments of some kind, they're just in his wife's name or not reported for some reason?

[-] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

You could have literally looked a bit into to see that neither him or his wife have any investments of any kind aside from pensions, instead of writing something like this.

[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago

Gonna need some evidence to suggest that there might be unreported items instead of just assuming that there must be something just because.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It's the Trumpy way to try to argue or make a point. Just throw shit against the wall and see what sticks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This guy is the real deal and everything, but I wouldn’t begrudge him what I have for myself, which is some investments in broad index funds, mainly. Something to rely on when I finally fuck off from the office.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] TacticsConsort@yiffit.net 19 points 3 months ago

Holy shit. The man's practically a saint. All the best to him, I hope Kamala takes him to the top, because that's where he needs to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
981 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2150 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS