401
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by BMP5k@feddit.uk to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

1000004515

Not sure how long this has been a thing but I was surprised to see that you cannot view the content without either agreeing to all or paying to reject.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 113 points 8 months ago

A common thing in continental Europe too. NOYB and some EU lawmakers are trying to make these pay-or-ok schemes illegal, but I guess in the UK you will be out of luck regarding that.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 40 points 8 months ago

Wouldn't this be blatantly in conflict with the EU cookie law? Like I'm not from Europe but my understanding was that it needs to be equally easy to accept or reject all cookies. Dark patterns aren't allowed

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Currently it's a grey area I think

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's not a grey area, it's clearly illegal (consent has to be given voluntarily. If you can't use the site without paying, that's not voluntary). Agencies so far just decided to look the other way and play dumb. There are lawsuits ongoing.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 8 months ago

UK is not EU, so EU law does not apply.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 34 points 8 months ago

Person I'm responding to said this was common in continental Europe

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 11 points 8 months ago

i think this one might, actually. When the EU passes a law like this, each member state passes it into their own national law, and so if these cookies laws were implemented before the UK left the EU they’d likely still be there

[-] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 8 months ago

It's more than that. The EU law lets any EU citizen report a company that's not in compliance. That includes companies not strictly in the EU. It's why even US companies tend to be in compliance (or something like compliance).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

The GDPR was enacted in 2016 and came into effect in 2018. The UK left the EU in 2020.

[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

But UK laws do, which share a lot of commonality - like the GDPR

[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 15 points 8 months ago

I think this type of scheme is illegal under the GDPR, which is in effect in the UK just as it is in the EU.

It's been a while since I worked with the GDPR, but from memory the wording is such that:

The data holder needs to allow people to opt out of data collection. The subject can request to be forgotten. The data holder explicitly cannot charge for this.

But changes move slow, and The Mirror is probably banking on nobody caring enough to complain, and Trading Standards being too underfunded and swamped with other work to investigate otherwise (which they are). If they're challenged, they'll just change tack, go "oops" and are unlikely to hit big fines unless they dig in.

Cookie laws are a horrible mess and always have done - the resulting consent banners are far more intrusive than anyone wanted.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The EU is now fighting such schemes though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 61 points 8 months ago

Lmao even if you pay, you still see ads, they just won't track you. What an insane monetization scheme

[-] suction@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

“But if we don’t track you, we lose all the money we’d have made selling your data to Oxford Analytics so they can help Putin convince your uncle to vote for far-right candidates?!?”

[-] Senal@programming.dev 57 points 8 months ago

"News outlet" might be the most generous interpretation I've ever seen.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 26 points 8 months ago

Well ok, they have no GDPR.

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 10 points 8 months ago

German news outlets all do it. The data protection agencies have sadly so far ruled it's ok (there are still ongoing lawsuits afaik).

[-] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Every outlet in Italy as well.

[-] loutr@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

It's standard practice in France too. This is not forbidden by RGPD.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 13 points 8 months ago

you Frenchies and your fucked up transposed acronyms

[-] loutr@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

Shut the fuck up or I'll go OTAN on your ass.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago

Careful, your 5.56 OTAN bullets might shoot backwards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 8 months ago

Refer them to the EU. EU is going after Meta for charging for an ad-free plan. Oh, right. The EU only goes after USA corporations and deliberately wrote their rules to exclude companies like Spotify. Oh wait, there was Brexit, so it doesn't matter anyway. Brits voted themselves right to fucking shit. Kinda like what we might do in a few months.

Vote. The stupid people definitely will, so it's necessary to combat them.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

And fuck abstaining on the basis of we only have two bad choices, I want a true leftist candidate. I would too, but by abstaining you are basically taking the bullshit liberal position of "I can't tell the difference between these two things"

[-] peto@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago

Just don't read The Mirror. Generally not worth the effort of moving your eyes from one word to the next.

[-] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 8 months ago

How can you pay to block cookies if they would need a cookie to remember that you paid?

[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 14 points 8 months ago

I've seen this on a few sites. They aren't even allowed to make rejecting cookies more difficult than accepting them but right now the legal people are trying to educate before they starting enforcing these rules. I expect the lawyers at the Mirror know that this is illegal but think they can get away with it.

All those things like having to "customise" your cookies to turn them all off, and "legitimate interest" is all illegal under the rules but they're trying their luck.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It's a litmus test for me. Just tells me not to use their site.

[-] SleepyWheel@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago

The Mirror website is cancer. I use NoScript and it won't load without allowing about 50 fuckkng scripts. MSN too. I avoid both but occasionally click on a link from elsewhere

[-] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago

"Back to concent"

Fucking animals.

[-] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Get yourself the Consent-o-Matic browser extension and watch these “we and our 8000 partners (hungrily) value your privacy” banners disappear.

If you stumble upon a web site that Consent-o-Matic does not handle, you can simply click the extension, click “Submit for Review”, and the devs will shortly add support for that site.

[-] Andrew@mnstdn.monster 10 points 8 months ago

I have this but it's no good for consent-or-pay, unfortunately.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] moon@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

But does that auto accept cookies like many of these other anti cookie banner extensions?

[-] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

You can customize how the extension handles cookie banners. See an example of current settings on most updated extension at time of this comment:

[-] Swarfega@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

uBlock Origin has two cookie filters that are disabled by default. I enabled that and ditched the consent-o-matic extension

[-] ChonkaLoo@lemmy.zip 8 points 8 months ago

Daily mail does it as well. Cancer. But not hard to circumvent with Firefox and some extensions.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

“News” outlet? Hardly. The mirror is basically Russian propaganda.

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

Can you manually uncheck all then save it?

[-] BMP5k@feddit.uk 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They are all unchecked by default but you can't save and exit, it just loops back to the subscribe screen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] idefix@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

A lot of websites in France have done the same for the past couple of years. Including Allociné, me ex-go-to source of information for movies and movie theatre schedule. Result: I have blocked those websites and I prefer pirating.

[-] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 months ago

FYI you should probably be blocking/whitelisting cookies client-side anyways. At the very least, disable third party cookies.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I NEED COOKIE 🍪 💉💪

[-] HerbSolo@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Only answer is to ban tracking cookies

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
401 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

36993 readers
328 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS