Seems like a good dude.
So there’s been a lot of progressive changes (weed, abortion, LGBTQ,) and he’s been working that here.
He genuinely cares about people and absolutely will be a great VP.
Edit: and you know the whole “Trump is weird” thing? He started that. (Well as a campaign thing.)
How did it start? I'm not American so I only get to see the reactions to newspieces commenting that Republicans are hating the weird thing, but have no idea how it's being used.
He was giving an interview with some tv thing and commented that trump is weird and people started running with it
Not actually a lot there. Mostly because that’s just Walz… being honest.
Kinda sad we don't get an astronaut vp but that's alright
Walz is more progressive than Kelly.
You win some you loose some 🤷
Agreed, but...
LOSE
Man the english language makes no sense.
the sound in lose is the same sound as we are taught “oo” makes.
Couldn’t a more straightforward language be chosen as the global one ffs
My father (who had a PhD in English) used to tell me that "ghoti" was pronounced "fish"
GH as in rouGH
O as in wOmen
TI as in raTIon
How do you pronounce women? When I put those sounds together it makes more of a fush or fosh than fish .
Or do you say fish different than me?
"Wih-men." I think you're thinking of woman, the singular version of the word.
That isn't really consistent with English orthography.
But you can write "pfysche", and that would be consistent with English.
Looks like we can thank the Dutch language for that one
Looks like loose is from Germanic/Old Norse, "laus"
And lose is from Old English, "los"
Also looks like I can't stand to look at either of these words for a few day now.
From my tiny amount of research eventually it passed through the Dutch layer and ended up as "loose" from those origin points before being adopted into english
doesn’t matter what the root is. Just conform the spelling to fit your language’s rules
Kamala must change her name to commalaa
Loose could really be tightened up if it could just lose one of those Os
There's also loose and they sound the same but mean different things.
Loose is when your pants is too wide.
Lose is when the pants were so wide that you lost them.
Lucy's loose legwear lost latitude, leisurely lowering, leaving Lucy's legs largely liberated. Lamentably, Lucy's lost leggings landed listlessly, loitering lifelessly.
Man looking a thesaurus is fun Lol
They don't sound the same at all though.
Lose - looze
Loose - luice
Interesting, I didn't know that. FYI, there's the phonetic transcription that saves us from using other words to describe a pronunciation.
luːz - lose
luːs - loose
I think they sound different, loose ends with a curt "s" sound, while lose ends with a longer "z" sound.
It would open up a senate seat dems don’t want to lose
When I was a kid, Scholastic did a "kids pick the president" poll. It was 1984 and John Glenn was running. I voted for him because he was an astronaut and The Right Stuff had come out a year before so I also thought he was basically Ed Harris. (I was 7.)
Jesse Jackson won. I was disappointed at the time. I'm not a fan of Jackson's, but I'd still have taken him over 4 more years of Reagan.
Yeah, but maybe one day President Kelly? He seems like a interesting person, though I don’t know all of his policy stances
As a Minnesotan I'm a little sad that he's going to be VP. But I understand. He's been a great governor. Any person that the conservatives give a shitty nickname, you know is doing a great job. Who knew checks notes making sure school children are being fed is such a controversial issue.
The upside for Minnesotans is that this could lead to Peggy Flanagan becoming the new governor, and she sounds reassuringly progressive.
Harris/Walz 2024!! Let's get out there
Good choice 👍
Told yah all. I'm gonna go kick her another $30
my house just put in $50. would likely not have scraped the barrel for that and done just the usual local/state donations.
see, dems... this is how you juice up your base and get the grass roots hands/feet/wallet support flowing.
now fucking win and fucking deliver. our children are out of time.
FUCK YES!
He’s got a pretty solid flavor of vanilla. Good choice, Kamala
He's vanilla bean. Pretty basic, but has those little flecks of flavor in him.
Walz 60
He doesn't look a day over 75.
Reading the article though he sounds like a good pick
Minnesotan here, been very pleased with the direction of policy and commitment to constituents he's had. Bummed he won't be the gov when he's VP but that's just me being a little selfish.
That's great to hear. I'm not American, but you can't sleep next to an elephant, and not feel when it moves. What happens south of our border definitely influences Canadians, and even their politics. I earnestly hope Harris takes it. She's got a lot of buzz around her: way more than Biden ever did. She's a legitimately solid candidate - something we would kill for up here.
Better choice than Shapiro
Wooo hooooo!!!!!
Dude seriously walz right into the position.
He she?
Washington Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Washington Post:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/06/harris-walz-vp/?
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.