447
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 94 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

(Sigh) Again, national polls are meaningless since we don't have national elections.

Last time I did this, Harris was in the hole in the swing states where it counted, let's see how it looks now...

Arizona - Trump +2 to +5
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/

Nevada - Tossup, Tie, Harris +2, Trump +1
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/

New Mexico - No polling data for Harris.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/new-mexico/

Georgia - Tossup, Tie, Harris +1, Trump +2
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/

North Carolina - Trump +2 to +3
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/north-carolina/

Virginia - Trump +1 to +4
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/virginia/

Pennsylvania - Trump +2, +3, +4, Harris +3
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/pennsylvania/

Michigan - Tie, Harris +11, +12 https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/

Wisconsin - Harris +1, +2
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/

Minnesota - Harris +3 to +10
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/minnesota/

So, previously, Harris was behind everywhere. She's now moved Nevada and Georgia to tossup territory, which is good, but the notable news are the HUGE gains in Michigan and Minnesota.

HOWEVER... Plotted on the electoral map:

The Triumverate is Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin. Losing any one of those three tanks her and she's down in PA.

She could win all the tossup states and still lose without PA.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The electoral college is still close, yes, but it is not what you are saying in some of those states. For instance, the Virginia polling you cite stood out to me as not matching most of the polling even when Biden was running, so I looked into that:

  1. There aren't polls in 538 for Virginia that were run after Biden dropped out

  2. The range your writing to me looks though you are looking at only a results of the singlular FAU/Mainstreet USA Poll from not only before Biden dropped out, but the days after Trump was shot. This poll also has a 4-5% margin of error due to low sample rates. The reason I suspect that this was the only poll being looked at is the poll has a ton of entries in 538 because it was broken down quite a bit. It asked likely voters and register voters about Harris as a hypothetical both with third parties and without (this creates 4 entries in there). The difference between likely and registered voters created a trump +1 and a trump +4.

  3. Most of the other hypothetical Harris polls in Virginia before Biden dropped showed Harris up. Considering Harris has generally improved compared to hypothetical polling before Biden dropped in most states, it's unlikely to be Trump +1 to +4 at the moment


538's moving averages show a bit of a different picture for some of those states as well. For instance, Pennsylvania shows a narrow +0.6% Harris average (note though that they do weight register voter polls different than likely voter polls)


Election is still close, but there has been movement in swing states. Enough that some election models are now changing who is most likely to win if only slightly. For instance, Nate Silver's model puts Harris just a bit above in win % including electoral college in it

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Just going with what we have, and like I say, there has been positive movement for her since the last time I ran these stats.

The concern for Virginia was that it had been solid for Biden, with him out, it's definitely at risk.

What will be interesting is to see how all this changes once she picks a VP and they start team campaigning.

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

So it has to be Shapiro.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Some newer YouGov and RealClearPolling reports: https://ijr.com/trump-harris-sit-on-razors-edge-with-voters-in-battleground-states-poll-reveals/

In the rust belt, Harris is tied with Trump at 48% in Michigan, 50% in Pennsylvania and is just one point behind in Wisconsin at 49%, according to the poll. Previously, Trump was leading Biden in Michigan by 2.1 points, in Pennsylvania by 4.5 points and in Wisconsin by 2.9 points, according to polling averages from RealClearPolling

Harris has also gained ground in the south and the sun belt, tied with Trump at 49% in Arizona, trailing by three points in Georgia and North Carolina and leading by two points in Nevada. Before Harris became the presumptive nominee, Trump was leading Biden in Arizona by 5.8 points, in Georgia by 3.8 points, in North Carolina by 5.4 points and in Nevada by 5.6 points, according to RealClearPolling averages.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yup, the momentum has swung back away from Trump, there should be another bump when the VP tour starts and another for the Convention.

The question then becomes if it can hold through November.

I really look forward to re-running these stats in September/October.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There is literally zero percent chance that Trump is up in Virginia. If anything you can calibrate the other polls from this.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It is, fortunately, square miles don't get a vote. :)

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

What are the error bounds on those polls? Last I checked they were all within the margin of error for swing states.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Each poll is different, but in general the margin of error is 3% to 5%.

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago
[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 38 points 2 months ago

Dems absolutely need at least +5 % to eke out a win in the electoral college.

This sounds like dems celebrating too soon to me

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We're celebrating that the trend is positive.

Look at it this way: when polls continued to decline under Biden the trajectory, the trend, portended a very bad outcome and signalled a change in strategy needed to occur.

When Democrats see these headlines, it means the battlefield is shifting in our favor or the wind is in our sails even if the war isn't yet won.

That's all. If a downward spiral of polls spells despair, an upward ascent of polls spells hype and enthusiasm, which tends to he contagious and self-sustaining like a nuclear reaction.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

Actually I didn’t see that here at all.

When the polls were bad I mainly saw the blue no matter who crowd go on and on about how inaccurate the polls are

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Niche communities on a niche website like Lemmy are not representative of the wider democratic sample set to be fair. I was definitely one of those people sounding the alarm on here. For a considerable time many people felt Biden was our locked-in nominee and we had to support him no matter what because there was no alternative choice. And true, Vote Blue No Matter Who still applies whether polls go well or not.

But luckily, the wider Democratic party put enough pressure to have Biden stand down.

[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The polls are inaccurate at times, that they don't necessarily show the exact amount of support a candidate has. A change in trends across multiple polls over time, however, can show changing attitudes, even if the specific percentage of support estimated is not necessarily accurate in each poll.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

They are a toxic bane and should be named, shamed, and ignored.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

5% at a minimum.

8% to be a real favorite.

12% percent and it's locked up.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Well technically you hypothetically could win an election with only 23% of the popular vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Which is why 1% lead in polls is not very promising for kamala

And on top of that I’m assuming the polls have a margin of error at the very least of 2%

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I mean this is why any blue maga from the previous 8 months needs to be named, shamed, and tied to a stake at the edge of town.

Democrats never needed to be in this position, and it wasn't Biden to blame for the unforced error, but the anti democratic culture within the DNC, main stream media, and large social media that worked it's ass of to shut down any questioning of Biden as presumptive nominee. That did more damage than Trump ever could have. Trump isn't the reason Harris starts off polling in the 40s, Blue MAGA is.

The VP pick up seems make or break for the early momentum Harris got. Shapiro seems like cold water; Walz seems like it would add fuel. If she goes Shapiro, this 1% week over week delta is going to stall out, because she's signaled to progressives and black and brown people she doesn't take Gaza seriously and that puts MI on the chopping block.

Prob the most interesting presidential race in a hundred years.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I'm holding all celebration until the election is certified and there is no sign of insurrection.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

no sign of insurrection

For what it's worth: I'm not a democrat. Ask me why I'm supporting a democrat and will say in no uncertain terms there is no choice to be made this election. I mean there's a lot of reasons, but it is utter insanity this isn't enough by a long shot.

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

My dad was the same way after Jan6. Before he had been a hardcore drumpf supporter.

Seeing the attack on our capitol finally broke him out of it. I don't know if he's going to vote at all but I am sure that he won't be voting red for the first time in his life.

My aunt? Well.... not so much...

Thank you for being clear sighted about what has happened.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That shit never would have flown with me. Again, I might be libertarian, but not the crazy kind.

But for whatever it's worth, this whole last decade has been weird. I know, personally, people who showed up with the goofy "tea party" hats that just kinda quietly bowed out, and on the other end people who became more vocal. It's just not normal. There's not a consistency between teaparty/not teaparty republicans and Trump.

I'm glad your Dad at least is in the former. I'll argue all day with those people about basic human rights, but my point is shit is fucked. The people I know, whether or not I agreed with them, that were on those statehouse steps, are not turning out to vote. I get fiscal conservatives, I get structuralists, I hope someday to meet one or the other, because certainly neither has ever been elected to office.

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I know exactly one fiscal conservative and she thought the Tea Party was trouble long before either the media or I had figured out they were anything more than a goofy protest group.

That said, she was one person out of thousands. I used to live in a very red state and the vast majority of my fellow citizens there were the exactly stereotypical bigoted redneck that drumpf's bombastic style appeals to.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

There are legitimate concerns about our spending and debt. Fiscal conservatives aren't totally wrong when they bring that up, but it's never the sacred "free market" that has to take the blows. The last proper fiscal conservative was Eisenhower, and even that's a mixed bag.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It’s so fun and cool that the person with the most votes still loses but only if not Republican. Great system.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

Most votes usually means the big states and electoral college is more closely associated with representation in the House of Representatives….. so the electoral college is somewhat related to population but it’s off by a lot… there are also other factors, for example states with overall low populations (generally republican)

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

There’s a positive trend but I don’t think it’s as pronounced as some are celebrating it to be, or is it enough

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

There's momentum at the moment and things can change quickly. But there's just no doubt that Biden's decision to step back and Harris stepping up has sent Trump reeling.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

Agreed, as a progressive I’m actually getting excited for once in a long while

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The campaign certainly isn't celebrating too soon (Walz was a smart VP pick vs Vance who was clearly a celebratory lap pick). But yes, many people in the American left seem to think Harris is going to shit all over Trump despite her only just pulling even during her honeymoon period.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bappity@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

KAMALA HARRIS EDGES??!!!?!!!?!!11?1!!1!1!!

[-] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago
[-] bappity@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

THE PROPHECY HAS BEEN FULFILLED

[-] uint32@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago
[-] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

By election time they will probably say she's going to win. Seen this before.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

The Conversation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Conversation:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - Australia
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://theconversation.com/kamala-harris-edges-ahead-of-donald-trump-in-national-polls-for-us-election-235187
~Media~ ~Bias~ ~Fact~ ~Check~ ~|~ ~bot~ ~support~

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 7 points 2 months ago

I'm more interested in what the swing state figures look like post-honeymoon bump.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It's a trend, so you'll see many stories like this as the weeks go by. Once the pollsters start calling purple states, then start paying attention.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
447 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3471 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS