739
submitted 2 months ago by j_roby@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] soul@lemmy.world 131 points 2 months ago

He hasn't been afraid to say the quiet part out loud for a while now. This isn't news, it's more like a final echo off of a once-distant wall that's just about within reach.

If enough people don't get off their ass in November and vote to put Harris, the only other ACTUALLY REALISTIC choice, into office, then the final dominoes will fall.

I'm looking at all of you casual voters who don't go every time. I'm looking at you independent voters. I'm looking at you remaining "undecided" wafflers. I'm looking at you unregistered "it's too hard “ and "I'm too busy" people.

If Trump gets into office again, that's on all of you, and you're gonna be part of the problem if you aren't part of the solution. NOBODY else is gonna do it for you. NONE of the other names that might appear on a ballot in your state will have a snowball's chance in hell. If you don't like Harris, that's fine, you don't have to like her, but choosing not to vote for Harris is giving your vote to Trump.

So get off your lazy ass for a few minutes to help save the world for what looks like it might be more than the next 4 years; it could be for a lot longer. And while you're at it, if you keep voting Republicans into Congress, State, and local governments, (where most of the power ACTUALLY is), then they will keep working us all toward this kind of position. Stop putting them in power. Period.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

If Trump gets into office again, that’s on all of you, and you’re gonna be part of the problem if you aren’t part of the solution. NOBODY else is gonna do it for you. NONE of the other names that might appear on a ballot in your state will have a snowball’s chance in hell. If you don’t like Harris, that’s fine, you don’t have to like her, but choosing not to vote for Harris is giving your vote to Trump.

I have a cousin who insists on voting for Jill Stein because she doesn't want to vote for Trump but "I could never in good conscience vote for a Democrat". I know people who buy into the "I have to withhold my vote (or vote third party, or whatever) because withholding your vote is the only way to force change and bring about ranked choice voting". I know people who won't vote for Biden over Afghanistan or the Israel conflict while fully acknowledging that Trump would be exponentially worse, but saying "Voting for Biden (now Harris) would be endorsing his actions, so I can't do that."

And sadly, I do wonder how many of these people are just closet Republicans who are down with the racism and bigotry, and use those reasons to justify the fact that they just really wanted to vote for Trump in the first place but aren't ready to admit it yet.

Some of these people don't know how the system works, and others don't care. They believe they're taking some kind of "principled stance" and think that somehow, in a two-person race (none of the other independent candidates even appear on enough ballots to make it to 270 in the first place), they can get people to not vote for Biden (now Harris) but still somehow not end up with Trump, as long as they Jill Stein hard enough.

They don't understand......One road leads to Harris. All other roads lead to Trump. There are no other candidates that could even mathematically make it to 270. As the song goes, "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice." Voting third party, or not voting at all in 'protest', is just voting for Trump with extra steps.

So get off your lazy ass for a few minutes to help save the world for what looks like it might be more than the next 4 years; it could be for a lot longer. And while you’re at it, if you keep voting Republicans into Congress, State, and local governments, (where most of the power ACTUALLY is), then they will keep working us all toward this kind of position. Stop putting them in power. Period.

And this is where you can tell who are the closeted Republicans. If they're voting D at the top of the ticket, then voting R downballot, they're a closeted Republican. They may not want to have to justifty their vote when they're sitting around with friends and family talking about the President, or your state governor, or whatever, where voting for Trump may still be considered embarrassing. But they'll have no problem voting for the bigot to sit on their local school board because they know nobody's gonna talk about who voted for who in the school board election of East Bumfuck, Nowhere.

It's why all but the most extreme (and often unemployed, violent felons) Proud Boys or Klansmen won't show up in public with their faces exposed. They want all the racism and bigotry, they just don't want to be covered with all the stink that goes along with it. So they quietly vote these people into power so they can get what they want while still pretending to be Democrats until they think they don't need to pretend any more.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again because I have seen no reason to believe otherwise: These issues will never go away until we address the systemic racism in this country at a grassroots level. And we have not even achieved step 1: We need to acknowledge that there are a lot more racists and bigots in this country than we were comfortable admitting to, and those people see everything that Trump has to offer and are saying "Yes, we want more of that.". But as a country, we are not willing to admit how deep the problem is and have spent the past 60 or so years pretending to solve the problem when all we've really managed to accomplish is sweeping it under the rug and pretending it doesn't exist, and we are now seeing the results of pretending that a significant portion of our voting base that is just as racist now as they were back in the 60s and before are just some fringe lunatics that can be safely ignored. They are not. There are a lot of them, and Trump has successfully coralled them into a very powerful voting bloc. And until that is addressed, this problem will continue no matter how many band-aids you try to stick on it. I'm not even saying I have any kind of a solution to that problem -- I'm a straight, white guy after all, but I do know enough to be able to say I don't know what the solution is, but I do know that what we're doing isn't it.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

"But my vote doesn't count" or some bullahit

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 95 points 2 months ago

Man isn't even pretending to hide it anymore.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 24 points 2 months ago
[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago

Title from every media company out there should say "trump wants to end democracy and become it's dictator"

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 months ago

“Yeah, but Harris is a woman and also…yah know…” - Libertarians and swing voters.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Libertarians = fedora kids and survivalists and flat earthers who don't feel connected to Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I love American liberals.

"Hmn, I think these folks driving tanks into our town hall and lining people up against the wall... they might be up to no good, we should spread awareness!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Have to = be allowed to

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 34 points 2 months ago

I am willing to accept that he mostly means "we'll fix the country so it won't be a close call ever again". I also am willing to accept he subconsciously means "I just need to pardon myself and I can't run again anyway, so I don't give a crap what you do afterwards".

Thing is, both of those are disqualifying, too, so... no real good options here.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 82 points 2 months ago

It's very obvious what he means, and it's not that. Stop giving him the benefit of the doubt, ffs

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

For real. Everyone welcome every single news outlet to a thread, turns out it's just one guy that can't read.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Davin@lemmy.world 77 points 2 months ago

If he didn't try a coup after he lost the last election, you might be able to give him the benefit of the doubt.

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

We'll fix the country such that votes wont matter

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 months ago

Welcome to whose county is it anyway, where everything is made up and The votes don't matter.

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Which is totally doable, just look at some of the hopelessly gerrymandered states. Wisconsin comes to mind. A judge was elected, to maybe fix it, but it still proves a point. I’m sure there are other states.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Not a guess. The bipartisan part is the dem governor. Legislature is locked hard as Republican with a gerrymander.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

He's already tried claiming that his first term didn't count because of the impeachments and he should be allowed 2 more.

There is no situation where he deserves the benefit of the doubt.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago
[-] Dlayknee@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

I really want to give him the entirely unwarranted benefit of the doubt that he's saying it won't matter in 4 years bc he won't be running (making the assumption he'll win this time and reach his term limit) but having watched the video I dunno, that "we'll have it fixed by then" sounds reeeeaaally ominous.

[-] Nelots@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It looks like the real benefit of the doubt is that he's hopefully talking about laws on voter ID being fixed. Still, what the hell is a presidential candidate doing telling people they don't need to vote anymore? Even with the benefit of the doubt, this shit is ominous.

Edit: to be clear, I don't give him the benefit of the doubt. All I'm saying is if somebody wants to, this is the best they're able to do. It's also important to be aware of the context of the quote, even if you believe he means it in the worst way.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

When did giving trump the benefit of the doubt ever work?

It wasn't even a dog whistle, it was a fog horn. There's not much room for interpretion.

Mr dictator on day one obviously wants to stay a dictator.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

He literally tried to fix the last election by seeking out individuals to form slates of imaginary electors in states he didn't win, telling his VP to discard enough votes to make him the victor, launching frivolous lawsuits seeking to have legit votes thrown out, seeking to influence local election officials in urban districts to fail to certify their districts votes and ultimately when none of that worked by sending a mob to stop the counting of the vote.

If I shot you in the head and as you were recovering in the hospital went on tv and said went on tv and said I'd take you down next time nobody would give me the benefit of the doubt and propose I meant on the basketball court. It's completely and totally crazy to propose he meant anything but what he clearly said.

[-] unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago

This needs to be front page news and of course it isn’t.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 months ago

CNN is trying to figure out what to do with their 350,000 LLM made articles about Biden being too old.

They keep trying to make stories about Harris, but since the LLM’s are trained on Reddit all it is doing is spewing out hardcore racism.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

This man is unbelievable. And I mean that quite literally. Don't believe him, believe the subtext. He wants to end Democracy.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago

Trump saying he has the Election Fixed is PROOF that DEMOCRATS engaged in Election Fraud!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Lucian Truscott thinks it is all about not having elections any longer once he gets in. I'm not so sure. I think it means more that he will get the "Christian" agenda put in place so his MAGA crowd no longer has to fight to get their ideas ensconced into law. But his entire approach has been that he will contest the election if he doesn't win. And he certainly didn't want to abide by the voters actions last election. He wants to rule for life. And then he wants his sons to take over.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

His dumb fuckin kids couldn't take over an unfinished donut.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

A Christian agenda, not the Christian agenda. The thing that most people don't get is that in the USA alone there are at least 200 different sects of Christianity and they have some very different ideas and they feel very strongly about those difference. Any voter who thinks Trump is going to enshrine their particular flavor of Christianity as law is a fool twice over. Even if he did manage to enshrine any particular sects rules into law, the chances of it being that particular voter's flavor of Christianity is incredibly small.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

I have said a version of this to a lot of rural people who vote R and do nothing. They all beg for a time when their town had a major “downtown” with ice cream shops playing 1950’s music.

What they don’t realize is once P2025 goes into action these people will have no more use for them and they will be left to die. No more welfare, no more Medicare. Most of rural America will wither away because they don’t do anything. Farms are corpo owned and operated.

Rural America will be turned into a wasteland by republicans.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

he will contest the election if he doesn’t win

Republicans say it will be "bloodless" if they get their way. Take that as a warning.

[-] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

So think of the SpongeBob meme where he keeps revealing more dirty diapers. We are currently at the panel where he points out the window to the mountain of diapers.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

But what do you do when you realize that half the people you're pointing the mountain out to have a diaper kink?

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

I maintain the true buttress holding up conservatism is religious suppression of kinks and sexuality.

Once we convince these people it’s ok to suck a dick, they are not bad for doing it, the GOP will crumble in a year.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago

Maybe he plans to have all the christian’s thrown into internment camps so they would not get to vote anymore.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

How does he know that everything deranged people want is the same as what Christians in the U.S. want? Christians and deranged republicans don’t form a circle Venn diagram

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Evangelicals do.

[-] aphlamingphoenix@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Those other Christians aren't true Christians.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Or more literally: You won’t have a choice

[-] moon@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Trump is the most dangerous figure in American politics. He's a demagogue, and a fascist insurrectionist. It's certainly arguable that he's saying 'we'll rig future elections so Christians always get their way' because we know that's what he has already tried to do and what he will undoubtedly do again if given the chance.

But it's equally arguable that he's saying 'we'll have the country fixed over four years, so Christians won't need to even bother voting again.' I've watched the video a few times and I think if you listen to his stilted speech it's clear he's doing his con artist/salesman schtick and saying 'believe me I'll fix your country so good you won't need another President.' Not to say that this doesn't also betray his anti-Democratic views, but I don't think this quote is the gotcha that everyone seems to think it is

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
739 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19050 readers
2611 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS