343

Just a small way to help people get their FOSS. What are some other projects that have torrents that would be good to seed?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] riplin@lemm.ee 106 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

At 16kb/s per connection , I think you have to ask yourself if you’re really helping. Have you checked your settings that you aren’t limiting your upload speeds?

Edit: people seem to be offended by this comment, so let me clarify by what I meant with “are you really helping”.

Torrent clients default to a fixed number of peers they download from. If you end up with only 16kb/s connections, you are being limited by those seeders in how fast you can download.

Whereas if there were less seeders but they could provide 1mb/s connections, you are limited by your own internet connection and are downloading full blast.

I hope that clarifies my statement.

[-] itslilith 126 points 3 months ago

I'd rather have a 16kb/s seeder than a dead torrent

[-] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 57 points 3 months ago

For real. I’m slowly downloading a documentary from one person right now, it’s been a few weeks and it’ll be a few more, but I thank them for it

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

I have had torrents that ran at extremely low speeds and also intermittently were offline because the seeder ran a colossal seedbox but rotated “inventory” to be able to seed more than just what they could handle at once. So it was rotating content. I downloaded something for almost three months I think. But eventually I got it all. Funny thing was I seeded it for the next like 6 months to help, but literally nobody ever connected, so I felt very fortunate that being apparently the only person who seemed to want the thing, I had found a seeder.

[-] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

How do you find seeders of rare content?

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Well, occasionally I’ll just be lucky enough I’ll try a result on a tracker that says 0 seeds. I try those all the time if I really can’t find a torrent with seeds. Lots of the ones that are seemingly dead, will kick up again at some point. I’ve had a lot of luck with even dead seeds from results on magnetdl.com and bitsearch.to but the latter you really want to have adblocks because they load a dozen of those shitty vpn ads every minute and they’re new window pop ups. Without Adblock I’d never even visit that site. But they have an excellent catalogue so I do use them. Magnetdl used to be my goto but lately they’ve had all kinds of weird cloudflare errors. Cloudflare sucks.

But aside from that and if someone seeds something upon request it’s just blind luck. But my main point I guess would be don’t shy away from links with 0 seeds indicated.

[-] princessnorah 4 points 3 months ago

If it makes you feel any better, I had a torrent that took about a week to download. 12 months later my ratio is 139 or something. I like to think I resurrected it with the help of that one lone seeder.

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

No need to feel any better lol none of what I said was troubling. But it’s nice that the torrenting community in general is not just a bunch of leeches. I suspect that is because of the lack of widespread popularity which is good. This should continue to remain a subculture to a certain extent.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

same boat, what documentary?

[-] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Under an Arctic Sky. It’s about surfers going to Iceland to.. surf, I assume

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stewi1914@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

The torrents include the normal http download URLs and fetch from them too. Official torrents never die.

[-] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 69 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

At 16kb/s per connection , I think you have to ask yourself if you’re really helping

That's a rather toxic mentality to have. Any amount of help is always appreciated.

[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 43 points 3 months ago

Torrent clients are usually smart enough to decide what the best seeders are to get the best possible availability and throughput.

OP seeding at 16 KB/s to some peers might also just mean that the leecher's bandwidth is mostly saturated by other peers so they don't need that much bandwidth from OP.

[-] admin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago

You'd be surprised to know that a 500GB hard drive can be theoretically copied in 1 year with a 16kb/s transfer.

[-] princessnorah 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This feels like you don't really understand how the BitTorrent protocol works at all. When you watch Netflix, or download proprietary software (for example Steam) you are connected through a CDN to the geographically closest node. That's one of the main reasons it can be so fast.

However, torrent files aren't distributed by geographic region, the pool of peers is spread out across the globe. So if someone is on the other side of the earth, your upload speed to them is going to be quite small.

You're suggesting OP stop seeding because those seeders will be able to download faster, but we literally see just a snapshot. There could be leechers local to OP that come online and have a close, fast seed.

I'm generally seeding at 50-100kB/s, and when I check those connections they're almost always overseas (qBittorrent resolves the IPs and adds country flags). However, when another Aussie (or a Kiwi, sometimes Indonesians too) leecher connects, it'll often blow past my (ISPs) 50Mbps upload cap to 160-200Mbps or 20-25MB/s. Are you saying I shouldn't seed because that way an American or European will be able to download faster? Even though it's been pointed out to you that it doesn't even work that way. The BitTorrent protocol was designed from the start to mitigate this by prioritisation of peers on the clientside.

I can't believe such a toxic and inaccurate comment has this many upvotes.

[-] riplin@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You're suggesting OP stop seeding because those seeders will be able to download faster, but we literally see just a snapshot.

I suggested that OP check their settings.

Are you saying I shouldn't seed because that way an American or European will be able to download faster?

Again, that’s not what I am saying at all. Stop putting words in my mouth.

I can't believe such a toxic and inaccurate comment has this many upvotes.

If you’re looking for a toxic comment, look at your own where you are wilfully misrepresenting my argument, make wild assumptions and then attack those. That's textbook definition of toxic behavior.

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Don’t most clients switch to seeders that deliver faster? Over time, I mean?

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Whereas if there were less seeders but they could provide 1mb/s connections, you are limited by your own internet connection

Gigabit internet connection gang rise up!

[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 64 points 3 months ago

Not FOSS, but a library/archive: https://annas-archive.org/torrents

Popular Linux ISOs are usually mirrored across a lot of mirrors (duh), so availability is already very good.

[-] Smoolak@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago
[-] gitamar@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago

Be sure to check the checksum after downloading and check if the release is somehow up to date. They only list raspberry pi os images older than a year

[-] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

new House of the Dragon episodes

[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago
[-] guiguinofake@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ctag@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 3 months ago
[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 4 points 3 months ago
[-] YourMomsTrashman@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

The Rotating Food Gifs Collection 1-5

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 14 points 3 months ago

Do you have a link to this torrent? I am very interested.

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 months ago

Wikipedia torrents from kiwix

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

oh yeah torrenting them linux isos

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago

You're not seeding properly, check your upload settings or try qBittorrent.

[-] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

OP has acceptable seed ratio on the files near the bottom.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

Anna's Archive can always use help

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] andrewth09@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago
[-] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 months ago

Does anybody download iso's via torrents? Or how to help the actual sites that serve these? Since I trust the source more than torrents.. Especially for an image..

[-] cantevencode@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

You grab the .torrent file from the source website (Mint, in this case) and it's safe

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Maetani@jlai.lu 15 points 3 months ago

Verifiying the checksum of an iso takes 30 seconds... You don't need to trust anyone

[-] Sekki@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

I don't think that is even necessary. If you download the .torrent file from a trusted source it will already contain a secure hash of the final file. Also every piece you receive also comes with a hash that can also be verified through the .torrent file. If you don't trust the source enough to provide a valid .torrent, I don't see how downloading the image directly from them makes any difference. Read more: Official BitTorrent BEP BitTorrent V2 and SHA-256

[-] weker01@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Well you do need to trust the checksum provided. That is the one you are checking against. Better would be a signature from a key you trust.

In the end a modern torrent is just a hash.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] communism@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago

I prefer to download isos via torrents. You can easily check the checksum and signature once it's downloaded. And you're getting the torrent/magnet link/etc from the source so it's not some random torrent from piratebay or something lmao

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 months ago
[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

For projects that is on git system, better automate mirroring to your self hosted git alternative

[-] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

netbsd.org will love that

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
343 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

47976 readers
922 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS