In addition to this, they are working with an OEM to produce their own Graphene phones. It sounds like they've made significant progress on that front so I'm hopeful.
Outdated how? I use it for my daily driver and it works fine for me. It's a fairly simple program and the 0.3.x river protocol is fairly stable so I would doubt it's become outdated, but if it is, you should be able to patch it yourself given the simplicity of the program.
Also I remember seeing screenshots where PDFs looked transparent or matched the terminal colors. Is that actually a feature of some of these viewers ?
Zathura lets you recolour and theme pdfs, yes. See zathurarc(5). You can set alpha using "rgba(r, g, b, a)" when setting a colour, e.g. set to 0.8 for 0.8 opacity.
Jesus. I hope your neighbours are ok?
It's been around for ages and is made of the same stuff as cast iron, but instead of being poured into a mould, it's sheets that get stamped into shape. So it has similar properties eg you can season it, you take care of it the same way, but it has a smoother surface and tends to be a lot thinner. I don't have one but I got gifted a Teflon wok for free; once I need to replace that, I plan to look for a carbon steel wok.
Not sure what ly is but basically I'm saying you should be using the dbus-run-session sway command to run sway instead of just sway. If dbus is installed and the daemon is running then this will allow you to e.g. open links in Discord.
The commenter talking about xdg desktop portal is correct for the file picker; you need to install a portal for that.
I can’t get links to open from discord
Are you using dbus? Display managers normally will launch graphical sessions with dbus for you, but if you're manually launching from the tty, use dbus-run-session sway (or the name of the executable you want to run). dbus is used for applications to communicate with each other, e.g. Discord to communicate with your browser. And you need dbus installed and the daemon running, of course.
Daily, or on machines I don't use daily, every time I boot into it
That's a pretty misleading headline. The news article is about a cool art installation, in which an artist has used a deceased composer's DNA to produce electrical signals that are interpreted as music. Still cool, but it's not "composing music" in the same sense as the alive musician was composing music.
Jerk your buddy off for him since he can't do that right now
Lol when I saw the title of this Lemmy post I thought to myself "I bet it's the two usual suspects voting no" and lo and behold. Plus their third.