1191
submitted 3 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 399 points 3 months ago

I mean we've been saying they are both too old. That hasn't changed.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 96 points 3 months ago

Unless the democrats fuck up and pick someone over 70, it's a good win for them on this point.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

I think everyone who had their name pushed and could have a chance at the convention has already endorsed Kamala Harris. They're pretty obviously trying to avoid a contentious convention.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] The25002@lemmings.world 18 points 3 months ago

Yeah it's a point they're allowed to make now, don't know how well it's really going to stick though. However so far the best republicans have against Kamala is that she... Laughs? That's a good sign. Like a lot of the stuff people like me on the left have against Kamala is stuff republicans wouldn't want to at her for.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] blazera@lemmy.world 168 points 3 months ago

He is too old, but like, if a 90 year old hitler were running for president i wouldnt be saying im not voting for him because of his age. Trump has been the worst parts of humanity for decades.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 70 points 3 months ago

Exactly. "Too old" is a concern, but far less than "fascist wanna be dictator."

[-] troglodytis@lemmy.world 139 points 3 months ago

Wait wait, the Democrats, who said Biden was too old and stopped giving $ to Biden's campaign are being consistent in their message? Well I'll be damned.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

How dare you hold republicans to even the most meager standards!

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Hikermick@lemmy.world 125 points 3 months ago

He confused Biden and Obama, Haley and Pelosi. Bizarre stuff spews from his mouth nearly every time he opens it. Where's the outrage?

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Where's the outrage?

Gnawing a hole in my gut.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 98 points 3 months ago

This really demonstrates a difference between democrats and republicans.

Democrats cared about the hypocrisy of pointing out that the opponent candidate was too old, and only started saying this after this was no longer a problem.

Republicans didn’t care that their candidate was also too old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gardylou@lemmy.world 84 points 3 months ago

Its not his age it's that his brain is broken.

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 3 months ago

His brain is even more broken than before. Watch the footage of MAGAts walking out of his rallies as he keeps repeating the same things and talking gibberish.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Cort@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

And not just normal age related broken. Though age hasn't really improved the situation.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

He abuses Adderall which would explain his cognitive decline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hawanja@lemmy.world 81 points 3 months ago

I mean, he is too old. He's only 3 years younger than Biden. So if the narrative here is that Biden is too old, then so is Trump.

[-] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

That three years makes a big difference to Trump voters, that is the difference between "Frowned Upon" and 18 years old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bmeffer@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

He is only the candidate because of DEI. It would be discrimination to disqualify him based on his advanced age. Damn DEI.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago

Jesus Fred Christ what are the photo editors doing?

Every trump article has an ever-more-close-up even-greasier horror picture of his sociopathic rapist fraud face. Man, nobody wants to see that shit!

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

Exactly what they should be IMO. It's an article talking about how he is too old and that photo, even from the tiny thumbnail I see, is just perfect for demonstrating that fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago

Opening the eyes of the blind

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

This fat bitch trying to look like Emperor Palpatine or something in this picture lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 46 points 3 months ago

if you aint fit for working after 65+, you shouldnt be fit to be a fucking president

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 62 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A single felony conviction prevents you from getting a TON of jobs...

... but apparently 34 doesn't prevent you from being president

load more comments (1 replies)

It was all the media really cared about before. Should be their number 1 concern now. Right?

[-] TheAlbatross 41 points 3 months ago

They should. Both Biden and Trump belong in a home

[-] Kabloink@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

Makes sense, If 81 is too old, 78 is probably too old too. After all, Trump would be 81 during his presidency if he wins.

[-] wolfeh@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

Is it just me, or has Newsweek been putting out a lot of content about how Trump is losing and doing poorly, despite most polls saying otherwise?

Beware this source. It's one step away from a tabloid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Draegur@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago

Turnabout is fair play~

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

This tactic implies that Trump voters ever gave half a shit about age in the first place. They attacked biden's age because it was low hanging fruit. No risk, high reward. Nice easy way to say they're "holding their noses and voting for Trump", even though that was the plan all along, because Biden's age gave them a convenient excuse to justify their choice without exposing themselves as bigots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Democrats have begun to question former President Donald Trump's age hours after he was made the oldest presidential candidate in history yesterday. A Kamala Harris campaign spokesperson told Newsweek that "the American people are rightly concerned."

Lol! Nature is healing.

Yes, we're very concerned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

He could always drop out if this is hurting his feelings.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

I mean, everyone is saying it. Everyone. Even some of the magaloons know it. Even if it's only a very tiny voice they hear only after they turn off the Faux "News", turn off the hate radio and shut off 4chan or whatever and go to tuck themselves in...they know it.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Donebrach@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

The fascists are pikachu facing that people are fine voting for another democratic candidate after one day because they cant fathom losing their strong man candidate. In their world Dems losing Biden = loss of voters because if Trump somehow stopped running literally no one would turn out for the GOP ticket. Lesson is: one party is based on a vague platform, the other is based on a lunatic personality cult.

[-] razorwiregoatlick@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Just look at that turkey gobbler! That is a sure signs of someone who is too old!

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago
[-] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 12 points 3 months ago

This should come as no shock. Age has been a concern since 2016.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
1191 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS