1537
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AsherahTheEnd@lemmy.world 217 points 7 months ago

I'm voting for Biden. Not happily, not even simply neutral on the matter. I hate that I have to vote for Biden.

If AOC ran, I would not be even a little reluctant to vote for her. She reminds me of Bernie.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 142 points 7 months ago

I’m voting for the Biden administration. It’s more than just him. We need them all.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 57 points 7 months ago

And the possible seats on SCOTUS

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

I’m voting the same way but more because we need to not have the other administration, we need much more that the current admin but we also do not have the luxury of being picky

[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

AOC is actually not old enough to be president. Ironic given how old the candidates are...I agree, Biden has my vote

[-] noevidenz@infosec.pub 58 points 7 months ago

AOC is currently 34 and her birthday is in October, so she will actually be old enough to be president by the time of the election.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 132 points 7 months ago

Fuck yeah. Probably won't go anywhere with a traitorous house majority but it's worth it to try and get them on the record.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 81 points 7 months ago

Just today I read that Clarence Thomas accepted a yacht trip to Russia. There's a huge air of corruption around him and I've heard people are calling for him to step down.

https://lemmy.world/post/17424787

[-] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 33 points 7 months ago

And it was from 2003. So he’s been taking this shit forever and not reporting it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LadyAutumn 17 points 7 months ago

The term corruption doesn't even begin to cover it. The man is a paid actor. A rubber stamp for republican party political positions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ulkesh@lemmy.world 124 points 7 months ago

Wow, someone in Congress with a backbone. Nice to see.

[-] Kerred@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

I am still hoping for the day to see someone of the same party convict a politician.

If anyone has any cases I'd love a link!

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Nixon resigned a day(?) after the impeachment articles were filed, because House Republicans told him that he didn't have enough support in the party to not get convicted.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 86 points 7 months ago

AOC from NYC is the MVP in DC.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 17 points 7 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SnotFlickerman 62 points 7 months ago

If you're going to do the thing with replacing Biden as the candidate, you couldn't get better than AOC, who will be 35 before November.

I personally think replacing Biden this late is a bad move even though I already think Biden sucks. But I grit my teeth and voted for the fucker just like I did with Clinton, because the alternative is literally insanity and fascism. I just don't realsitically seeing the party coalesce around anyone new at the last minute. Organizing Democrats is like herding cats, being a big tent party sucks noodles.

[-] ghostface@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago

Just keep repeating, Biden may not be the best, but his administration has been fantastic!

In comparison to the other party... Not just Biden you are voting for the administration. Supreme court justices Which affect everyday life!

[-] SnotFlickerman 14 points 7 months ago

Exactly this. So the party doesn't do what I would personally prefer. I still prefer whatever the fuck they're doing over outright fascism.

[-] Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

He knows how to delegate to people who are smarter than him. He also knows the importance of 'tone at the top' in getting the best out of his team. This is what makes him the better candidate.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago

"this late"

Meanwhile, other countries' entire election season is like two months long total.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago

I've seen this criticism of replacing Biden often recently "it's too late! We won't have time!"

Putting aside for the moment that it isn't late at all and complaints that it is feel like talking points, Biden IS old. The stats on someone his age dying that year are extremely high. There is a good chance he dies before the election.

If there isn't a plan to deal with that fairly likely possibility, then there isn't a plan to win.

Anyone in a position of power in the DNC making this claim is them confessing their own incompetence.

[-] SnotFlickerman 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Hey man I've been dealing with the shitty outcomes of the politicians who lead this party being unwilling to listen to the public until well after the public has been proven right for my entire adult life.

I said Biden was too old in 2020. He's even too older now. The party didn't give a fuck and has spent their time hiding it and fucking us out of having primaries.

Who do you think will choose the new candidate? The same super delegates who gave us Hillary Clinton? It won't be a people's vote at the convention, it will be delegates, many of which are party apparatchiks.

Do you think the people who hid Biden's issues this late in the game will suddenly make a good choice? I don't. The party fucked us into this position and I do not think they are capable of unfucking us, sorry. Biden is who we have, alive or dead.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kit 11 points 7 months ago

I fangirl for AOC but she ain't ready. Give her 4 more years at least.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

She's more ready than Trump is who was already "president."

That said, I would rather her be in Congress longer because she can be a voice longer. After 8 years of being president if elected, she wouldn't then want to become a senator or whatever. That would pretty much be it for her in politics outside of ex-president things... and she'd only be 43.

I'm also sure Kamala would be pissed if AOC were to get the nom instead of her. Not that that matters.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 55 points 7 months ago

Lets all hold our breath while we wait for something to actually happen because of this.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 67 points 7 months ago

It’s a public repudiation in a way that is extraordinarily rare and highly symbolic. Nothing may change but shots have been fired across bows.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 19 points 7 months ago

We are long past the point where these assholes give a shit about symbolism or warning shots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Verito@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

We're well past it meaning anything. These rebukes, reprimands, and censures are political theater. Fascists laugh when you use the rigged system against them.

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 59 points 7 months ago

I still appreciate that its happening.

[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 48 points 7 months ago

Are we pretending impeachment does something useful again?

[-] Zomg@lemmy.world 65 points 7 months ago

If you assume it never will again, then you've been defeated

[-] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Ah but then you're admitting that impeachment has shown itself to be of little effect for a (current) moment. It's still incumbent on us as a society to hold those responsible for this accountable. And worse, it looks like somehow the impeached person is a likely prospect to become president again.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Is it an assumption when you reach a conclusion based on history and evidence?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 7 months ago

This will go nowhere. Oh, wait. I forgot that I live in a fake democracy. Sad face.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 34 points 7 months ago

Wasn't trump impeached twice? What does this even mean concretely?
Not knocking the sentiment, just questioning the practicality

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

Gives Dem voters something to rally around in the lead up to the election...

Like. This is literally the time and place for performative actions, but I swear it's like everyone's forgot what the word "campaign" means.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Without getting too technical, and someone please correct anything that may be represented incorrectly: It's basically like a trial. The House is the prosecutor, and jury and the Senate is the judge. The plaintiff is the United States itself, and the defendant is the political figure (president, SC justice, etc)

The House gathers / presents evidence and tries them then renders a verdict (Impeachment)

The Senate is responsible for sentencing or acquitting. Without a 2/3 majority voting to remove them from office, the impeached is acquitted.

In both of Trump's, the House found him guilty of the charges (impeached) but the Republican controlled Senate acquitted him.

Hard to edit it in on mobile, but see @ricecake@sh.itjust.works 's clarifications below to my analogy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 25 points 7 months ago

Fantastic, I know this probably won't go anywhere but this is the right thing to do regardless. SCOTUS needs to be held accountable to the American people for their actions. We grant them extraordinary power and that must come with extraordinary accountability. Holding them to a lower standard than any judge in a lesser court is ridiculous. The higher the court, the higher the standards should be.

[-] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well, she is trying her best at least to do* her job.

[-] craigers@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

AB👏SO👏FUCKING👏LUTELY

[-] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 15 points 7 months ago

We need an AOC superhero sape!

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I cant wait to see who the Republicans try to impeach in their childish and inevitable retaliation.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Fuck yeah, finally someone taking action

[-] blazera@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

give me an AOC presidential candidacy and I'll shut up about green party

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
1537 points (100.0% liked)

News

25286 readers
3226 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS