819
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 550 points 5 months ago

Proving Netflix could be replaced by five hard working people.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 197 points 5 months ago

Proving Netflix could be ~~replaced~~ outdone by five hard working people.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 94 points 5 months ago

Proving Netflix should ~~could~~ be ~~replaced~~ outdone by five hard working people.

[-] AnxiousDuck@feddit.it 39 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

~~Proving~~ Netflix ~~should~~ ~~could~~ be ~~replaced~~ ~~out~~done ~~by five hard working people~~.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anlumo@lemmy.world 124 points 5 months ago

They didn’t need the army of lawyers to get license deals, so that’s not a fair comparison.

[-] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 97 points 5 months ago

Its almost like its unecessary shit made up in order to keep profits away from working people artificially

[-] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 74 points 5 months ago

Yeah its almost like if we didn't keep extending copyright protections a bunch of stuff would be in the public domain and any streaming service could offer it without having to deal with licensing.

[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

I mean that's all well and good, but then how would the very deserving shareholders get dividends?

Won't somebody think of the shareholders!?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 79 points 5 months ago

The only reason all companies prices go up these days is for CEO pay packages

[-] 6gybf@sh.itjust.works 33 points 5 months ago

I think it’s more for major shareholders (which includes CEOs, of course)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] woodenskewer@lemmy.world 206 points 5 months ago

“substantial harm to television program copyright owners,”

Give me a fucking break

[-] Retrograde@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

Won't somebody think of the television program copyright owners??

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kakes@sh.itjust.works 203 points 5 months ago

Love how they make this sound like some incredible feat. When you aren't bound to license agreements, turns out it's actually very easy to have a "massive" content library. Literally the only hurdle is storage space.

[-] Bronzie@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 months ago

Yeah it costs, depending on quality of course.
My 14 TB disks are filling up faster than I expected and I am not close to Netflix’s catalogue.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 150 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nobody gives a shit, you're not doing enough to punish trump for his obvious, literally filmed and recorded crimes.

This is the equivalent of the cops celebrating after beating peaceful college protesters while pissing their pants and freezing while the uvalde kids were slaughtered and psychologically tortured.

You're focusing on the non victory and ignoring the failures. Cowards.

[-] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 23 points 5 months ago

You're focusing on the non victory and ignoring the failures. Cowards.

That's not true, they successfully did their job of protecting capital and the owner class. Same reason they don't go after Trump. He's in the owner class, so their job is to serve and protect him.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Grippler@feddit.dk 136 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"The group used “sophisticated computer scripts” and software to scour piracy services"

They used the basic tools that most(?) pirates use today like sonarr and radar??

I don't mind people pirating...i do mind people pirating and profiting from redistribution.

[-] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 5 months ago

Guessing they used Sonarr, Radarr, qBittorrent, maybe an NZB client....

Would you look at that, I'm sophisticated now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 114 points 5 months ago

Five men convicted by the court of the high seas for being absolute chads

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 113 points 5 months ago

It probably also had better user experience than all of them

[-] dan@upvote.au 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's the thing about all the pirate apps (apps like Weyd, Syncler, the now-defunct TVZion, etc). They're made by people that actually care, not by companies that are only in it for the money. The user experience is usually a lot better. One of those apps plus a Real Debrid subscription and you're set.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 112 points 5 months ago

The only thing I'm pisseed about is the fact that I was unaware of its existence. Fuck the system

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 105 points 5 months ago

You gotta be stupid as shit to run something like this from the US and keep a financial tail of credit card payments to you.

You also gotta be stupid as shit to actually pay 10 bux for this.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It ran functionally uncontested for ten years. And it would hardly have been the first underground streaming service to pivot legit and cash out.

Napster was sold for $85M back in 2002. Justin.tv rebranded as Twitch in 2011. Hell, AWS has it's share of pirate hosted files.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 104 points 5 months ago

They're here doing everyone a service. Why are there resources to prosecute this but not like elon musk's insider trading?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uriel238 98 points 5 months ago

Jetflicks, which charged $9.99 per month for the streaming service, generated millions of dollars in subscription revenue and caused “substantial harm to television program copyright owners,

The ownership class will tremble before a communist revolution!

[-] LonelyWendigo@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago

Yeah that competition really did demonstrate what an awful service all those media monopolies provided.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 89 points 5 months ago

If they had more content on offer than the big legal streaming services combined, should that not tell us something about the quality of legal offers?

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 63 points 5 months ago

What's there to learn that isn't already widely known? Existing (copyright) laws are asinine and all corporations eventually become consumed by greed. That's America in a nutshell.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 35 points 5 months ago

It's not even copyright laws, it's everyone insisting on exclusive contracts. There's no reason a piece of content couldn't be on Netflix and Disney+ at the same time. It would be a lot better for consumers if streamers could compete on price and service instead of which content they managed to create/licence.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 83 points 5 months ago

It harmed no one and nothing.

TV and Film are just angry that competition did it for a reasonable price and provided a superior service for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 73 points 5 months ago

This is despicable. What specific service was this? So I know how to avoid it if it should resurface.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 44 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Not only does it say that in the first paragraph, it says it here

Five men were convicted for their part in operating Jetflicks, one of the largest illegal streaming services in the U.S., officials said.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 27 points 5 months ago

Why in the world would you do this in the US?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 72 points 5 months ago

Honestly pretty funny to call the site "Jetflix" and advertise it as nothing but aviation videos. Nobody would know what you're up to until they pay you.

How much you wanna bet a aerospace nut subscribed to this because they love Jets, and immediately reported this site to the authorities because he got the avengers movies rather than Airbus maintenance videos or something...

Pretty stupid though to run this site out of the USA. Terrible opsec. They really just seemed to trust that nobody who cares would ever figure out what they were doing. Plenty of similar sites out there that don't even need to hide what they are because they are well outside of American jurisdiction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 59 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

“Sophisticated scripts to scour pirate sites”.

I think we’ve just found a new tagline for radarr and sonarr.

[-] digger@lemmy.ca 56 points 5 months ago

The group used "sophisticated computer scripts" and software to scour piracy services... for illegal copies of TV episodes, which they then downloaded and hosted on Jetflicks’ servers.

So they used some variant of Sick Beard?

[-] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

nah probably the arr stack

Sonarr: (Automatic TV series downloads)

Radarr: (Automatic movie downloads)

Tdarr: (Automatic transcoding of media, can help save you a lot of disk space)

Bazarr: (Companion app to Radarr and Sonarr, manages subtitles)

Prowlarr: (A replacement for Jackett from the Arr team)

Lidarr: Music

Readarr: Books

Mylar3: Comic books

Plex-Meta-Manager: (Automatic collections and metadata)

Overseerr: Request tracking and website front-end

Ombi: Let users request both movies/tv shows from a simple web interface.

Dopplarr: Discord bot to make movie/tv/anime requests

Pulsarr: Browser extension for adding movies to Radarr or Series' to Sonarr while browsing IMDB or TVDB.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 55 points 5 months ago

If five people can maintain a service bigger than all those combined, then the big streamers need to buck their fucking ideas up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] paris 55 points 5 months ago

The group used “sophisticated computer scripts” and software to scour piracy services (including the Pirate Bay and Torrentz) for illegal copies of TV episodes, which they then downloaded and hosted on Jetflicks’ servers, according to federal prosecutors.

They probably used Sonarr and Radarr and called it a day (or similar off-the-shelf tools available on GitHub). It's not very sophisticated at all. That combined with Jellyfin and a VPN (or Usenet or a country that doesn't care about piracy) and you have your own up and running. You could also just use free sites with an ad blocker instead of paying $10/mo like the service this article is about charged.

Unrelated to all of this: https://rentry.co/megathread

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I've got one of those too. Plex is great.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 42 points 5 months ago

ITT: Have you heard the good news about our lord and saviour, Jellyfin?

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] muculent@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Streaming services become required by law like insurance

Wait, why am I required to pay for a streaming service?

Because it has all of the entertainment electrolytes a human needs

[-] DasSkelett@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 5 months ago

We already have the private copying levy in Germany and some other countries, where you have to pay a fee for several products (printers, scanners, storage media like HDDs, SSDs, SD cards and thumb drives...) due to the potential that you could do (legal!) private copies of copyrighted media on them. The copyright collectives can set the amount of the fees freely (and it's ridiculously high).

This comes shockingly close to the concept already.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

They solved a problem people had after the fragmentation :)

[-] smb@lemmy.ml 27 points 5 months ago

its amazing how good services can be if some just skip the corporation-obligatory adding of enshittification. i remember an article about a downloadable (but not very legal) DVD with an installer for a (worthless but very popular) OS that included heaps of expensive industry software and the installer was point-klick what you want and then all is done in background and fully usable once done. reading that article it seemed to be a better installer than ever produced by any company for any product.

however as that payed streaming service seemingly leaves huge amount of bank records and ran for such a long time, i guess it would have been easy to stop their customers from paying them. it rather might seem that the real intentions of content corporations might not truely be what they officially claim. maybe we learn in 25 years that the content corporations really were behind such services, maybe like "better get money from ALL markets!" or such.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
819 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
2949 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS