276
Americans Are Wising Up to the GOP’s Tired Trickle-Down Scam
(www.commondreams.org)
It's only taken 40 years
My exact thought.
I’ll believe it when their candidate isn’t in an effective tie for the presidency
Trickle down used to be called horse and sparrow. The idea was that if a horse ate a whole lot of oats, some wouldn't get digested and the sparrow could eat them. I wonder why they don't use that metaphor today 🤔
Because it's stupid easy to debunk with one question:
If you want to feed the sparrows, why don't you give them oats directly instead of making them pick through horseshit?
Happy cake day! First one I’ve noticed since joining lemmy.
I don't know, trickle down always sounded like piss play to me. Not much better, worse? ¯_(ツ)_/¯
The sparrow in this analogy is of course the workers, who can pick the shit for the grain.
The revolution will not be televised. Can't imagine that metaphor coming up on 60 minutes.
Are they?
I really don’t think they will figure it out.
Yeah bruh, let’s wait until November before making a determination on that.
The trickle that you're currently feeling is from the rich pricks pissing all over you, not from economics. Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
Only to blame its effects on democrats just as conservative news sources tell them.
All while they fall for the GOPs brand new “firehose of lies” scam. That or its low calorie sister-brand “torrent of bigotry”, which is also popular with the conservative crowd.
Forty years too late, but I guess better than never.
SOME Americans Are Wising Up to the GOP’s Tired Trickle-Down Scam. There are plenty who think it is wonderful, mostly the rich and "poorly educated", but expertly propagandized.
There's no need in trying to revive Reaganomics, it never went away. Every president since him has practiced trickle down economics
Not even close
Who has refused to strike down Trumps tax cuts for the rich? Who, when asked, if he would strike down Trump's tax cuts for the rich responded. with an astounding, 'NO?'
Every single Democrat along with every Republican since Reagan has practiced trickle down economics. For all intents Biden is Reagan's 11th term
Riiiight. I guess with a username like yours, everyone is the enemy of whatever you think is right and just 😂
I have a different username, hopefully it doesn't offend you somehow. Let me give you an example of what the other person meant: credit cards have replaced large parts of our social safety nets. We think of the convenience but we aren't told how convenient credit was argued as a substitute for welfare programs. Now I'm getting ads to have groceries delivered on credit.
Name one president who has not been a neoliberal since Reagan.
Do these Americans have sufficiently low population density?
No?
Then it doesn't matter how wise they are.
It must be the diapers that are stopping the trickling down.
Bueller Bueller Bueller...5
*40 years later... Here! Here!
How ironic is it that I learned the term voodoo economics from an actual accountant playing the role of a fictional boring teacher that no one paid attention to?
It'll trickle so much and so very very fast, you'll say wow I've never been tricked on like that before, and you're just gonna love it.
You'll be tired of getting trickled on so hard. There'll be so much trickling going on.
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
276 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19096 readers
2857 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS