320
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago

No! Don't think about The Turtle! Look everybody! The libs are old and senile too! LOOK! [please don't look at the turtle. Nothing to see here. Nope The Turtle is fine. Look! It's a sleepy old person who is a democrat!!!]

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 169 points 1 year ago
[-] donescobar@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

Yes they do, watching him do a reboot live on TV is plain sad.

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be fair, that's about how long the typical android takes to reboot. Nothing exceptional.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Absolutely.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's true, but in Mitch's case it might be that staying literally kills him. He's the minority leader in the Senate, which has got to be stressful, and if the fugue state he entered was caused by a mini-stroke, he needs to be resting and avoiding stress like a literal plague.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

But how does a plague avoid plague?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 98 points 1 year ago

I'm confused that she's AT the meeting.

The pharmacy near the Capitol fills prescriptions for dementia medication, and those pills are going to our representatives. If you're taking dementia medication and are an elected official, sorry, but it's time for you to go. We'll get you a watch. If you can't even remember who you are, you shouldn't be crafting our laws.

[-] docmark@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At this point it's painfully obvious that they're literal puppets for people in power who don't want their names in a public forum like congress.

It's basically Weekend at Bernie's. Except not funny at all.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Feinstein was in her 30s when California colleges (UC and CSU) officially stopped having free in-state tuition.

We have to stop being "represented" by people with very little in common with the general populace.

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Apart from being old and having dementia, she's never had real job.

Yeah, her and let-me-pause-for-a-stroke McKlowenl do not represent people who actually work for a living.

[-] readbeanicecream@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago
[-] Chozo@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Not just term limits, but age limits, too. This country shouldn't be run by octogenarians who can't even recognize their own face half the time.

[-] Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

And they don't even know shit about what they're voting. Like the guy who said the internet was a bunch of tubes.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I have no problem if people elect a NEW senator that's 80 years old. But after two terms your service is done. Thank you, but you gotta go.

[-] MajorJimmy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Eh. I don't want policy crafted by somebody who's gonna die in the next few years. Age limits as well please.

[-] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Call me ageist, I don’t give a fuck, these people aren’t at the top of their game, hell they aren’t even at 50% of what the top of their game used to be. Furthermore, like you said, it’s absolute bullshit that people can make laws that they won’t see the effects of.

Cut off rep age at something like 60 if not 50. The younger generations should be the ones deciding the future, it’s THEIR future after all.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I'd double check term limits. We could just as easily create a chain of debauchery as we lose all experienced politicians that might be able to help. There would only be more incentives to line your own pockets when you only got 4 years. I hate seeing the extremely elderly pretend its 1978 too but I don't think term limits are the answer. I think we need more transparency on politicians, what they represent, their past actions (especially at local levels those people are nearly invisible), and most importantly we need to slit Lobbying's throat and drain all the blood just to be sure.

[-] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago

Everyone assumes term limits would be something super low like 4 or 8 years. In reality, it’d probably be something like 32 years, which is 8 terms. Still long enough to get a good career, but it ensures that someone entering the senate in their 30 or 40’s will be retiring at a reasonable age. Because the current problem is that everyone should’ve retired twenty or thirty years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hypelightfly@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Politicians aren't the experts, that's what they have a staff for.

[-] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Athens used single term sortition as their political methodology during the height of their empire. Anyone who wanted a government position could apply if they passed a test about their field of interest, and the winner was essentially drawn from a hat. After a single term they were dismissed and could never hold the position again.

You're overthinking this. Do you really think out of a country of 300 million plus we're likely to be limited to a few hundred competent politicians? Highly unlikely. We just need to educate people, like they did.

[-] cerevant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here’s my solution:

Get rid of the senate. It is the US aristocracy, anti democratic, and serves no useful purpose.

Require the house to have more votes (or a supermajority, whichever is less) to repeal a law than were needed to pass it. Edit: this reduces the effect of instability that removing the Senate would produce, while allowing the House to respond quickly to injustice.

Require the House to pass a budget once per term. If they (and the president) can’t pass a budget, the session ends, and they all (including the president) go up for re-election.

I’d say congress should pick the president, but that would tip my hand that I think Parliament is a better system of government.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Mandatory retirement ages, too. If pilots cannot work past 65, then neither should the president, Congress, or judges.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure she is really functional these days.

[-] Ducks@ducks.dev 12 points 1 year ago

She seems to not know where she is half the time, she needs to resign

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] okfuskee@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Does no one know when it's time to leave the party and go home? I'd rather have a bunch of young to middle aged folks try and work things out, than the McDonalds coffee crew we currently have in the major political parties.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These ghouls have nothing else. They're richer than God and their kids have cushy jobs. They won the game of life, all they can do now is cling to the power they've accumulated in a desperate attempt to stay relevant to a world that will be just fine without them.

They should all be Logans Run'd, starting with the Turtle.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Up vote for Logan's run reference

[-] Lammy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

When members of Congress, and sides don't matter, refuse to retire and keep having issues that prevent them from doing their jobs correctly, I believe it's news and I guess others journalists think it is too.

[-] torknorggren@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

It's really not, but it's probably good that we get reminders that we need a more functional system in place to get rid of these folks once they are incapacitated.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's not news worthy that someone running the country is incapacitated? What is news worthy of that isn't?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

First McConnell and now Feinstein, maybe it's time to implement term limits? These two should have retired long ago. (Feinstein before SOPA) Enjoy your golden years....

[-] miked@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This has been an ongoing issue for her but it usually gets hushed up.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

At a meeting today, Feinstein and McConnell agreed Trump's handling of classified documents might lead to him being impeached, but that bringing charges that leads to an impeachment trial is the duty of the house.

This lead to an argument with both their handlers that they were 100% correct in this assertion, and that they could not remove Trump from his current position as president without first a house vote.

Their handlers sighed and reluctantly agreed, and wheeled them away for bingo.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It is amazing that such senile plants still have voters. They are probably senile, too.

[-] OnlyTakesAshot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

She needs to go! Makes no sense keeping her around when she’s not helping with anything.

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Sen Dianne Feinstein appears confused at meeting

Well, that could be any meeting in the past 20+ years.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

In other news, the sky is blue and the pope is Catholic.

At least it's a bipartisan issue now...? Yay?

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

JFC. I'm 62, but 90 year old dottards who've never worked a day in their life can't represent me

We need age limits. But we won't get them because the reps are all farting dust and slurping at the gravy trough.

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

When doesn't she seem confused?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
320 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS