190
submitted 1 year ago by Goronmon@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 131 points 1 year ago

Okay, I'm all for good, complete education, but blaming people not understanding media on "too much STEM" is a bit ridiculous.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I dunno. Math asks me to just accept it's normal to have 60 watermelons and is trying move bulk orders of melons on a regular car. The goal is to figure out the problem and not accept that the person who is a wholesale watermelon dealer in denial is commiting tax evasion.

Or to discover that the melon seller has a regular job in ag and gets a bunch of melons on the side from the field and sells the harvest at cost to make up the part of their paycheck that was paid in perishable food.

Should we shame the seller for breaking the law or sympathize for being forced into that situation? People don't have the energy to care; they just came for a maths question.

[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 25 points 1 year ago

Sorry, dude, what you said must have been very interesting, but at some point I just stopped reading to optimize a watermelon workflow instead. Weird.

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

but... this is not the math you see at STEM, this is the math you see at high school at best. There's no deeper meaning in actual STEM math problems, they are way too abstract or specific. There's no watermelons, it's just some a, b, n1, nk... maybe some physics formulas that apply to velocity, mass... I read 0 problems in my uni math and physics courses where they used real world examples.

I see your point but that's for high schoolers, not STEM students or alumnus.

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

It's weird. I credit my scientific education with waking me up to questioning stuff. Like when you learn about how we know stuff, the limits of proof (e.g. can't prove empiricism is "true" it just works extremely well for certain things), how hard it is to wrangle stuff into scientific questions and so on the elephant in the room is how fucking impossible most questions are.

Then you get thinking about how untested most of society is, how many different ways there are to interpret things, how unknowable the "goodness" of your preferences is and so on.

Yet, in the same cohort as me there were a lot of people coming out extremely certain of their own worldview and blindly faithful in technocrats and the mystical power of throwing data at stuff to solve enormous problems. Like we are anywhere near being able to calculate out a human society.

So idk, I think it's less stem vs not stem and education quality and kinds of people/where they're at in life. You could probably go through a lit crit course and come out blinkered too, being able to do lit crit doesn't guarantee you'd have good opinions.

[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 5 points 1 year ago

This is what bothered me in the original discussion, making it seem like being in STEM somehow doesn't prepare you at all for critical thinking in general. On the contrary, I believe too there are people who develop it in part because of the S in there. It's not necessary, but it's an important tool.

Hopefully people don't need a college degree in literature to understand basic subtext. We ask kindergarteners to do that with Dr Seuss.

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Hopefully people don't need a college degree in literature to understand basic subtext.

I think it's about learning that it's worth doing more than anything else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

I see a Helldiver I up vote.

For Liberty!

But on a serious note, something as obvious as "Managed Democracy" and quitting your job by signing up for "Early Biovat Reprocessing" and the characters literally saying things like "HELLDIVERS NEVER DIE!" Before being obliterated by a 380? It's satire. Satire is funny. Like hahaha look at stupid Facist regime, I'll role play along to get into the mood of the game because the idea is so fucking dumb it's funny with amazing gameplay.

It's willful ignorance at some point. I don't think media literacy has much to do with it. It's simply listening for what they want to hear, then ignoring the rest, just as real facists desire.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure it would be impossible to play a game like Spec Ops: The Line or Bioshock and miss the political message

[-] teft@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago

People watch star trek and listen to fortunate son and miss the message in both of those pieces of art so I’m pretty sure someone would miss the political message in just about anything.

[-] DampSquid@feddit.uk 76 points 1 year ago

...and Starship Troopers, and every song by Rage Against the Machine...

[-] teft@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Would you like to know more (examples of people missing the point)?

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Music and film don't demand that you engage with them in the same way as video games. There are some games where you literally cannot play them without engaging with their narrative and message. Spec Ops: The Line is a good example of this. It actively pushes back against the player's natural inclination to play it like a modern military shooter and not absorb the message.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's actually very possible to miss the message of Bioshock. Andrew Ryan built the perfect city and Atlas ruined it. Andrew Ryan cast him out, but Atlas brought the player character as his final ultimate weapon. You eventually rebel, saving the capitalist Utopia.

I have seen people who abided by this interpretation. Any art with any level of subtlety can be misinterpreted. It's inherently subjective and depends on the viewer's personal biases.

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Capitalist utopia? Isn't the whole point that it's a Libertarian utopia?

[-] HiT3k@midwest.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are you unfamiliar with capitalism as a theory? Or Ayn Rand? Yes, capitalist utopia. That's the entire libertarian ethos. Libertarianism is a political framework for governance, pure capitalism is its economic policy.

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Don't get me wrong, the only Libertarianism I've ever known is intertwined with Capitalism. But they aren't the same thing, and I always read BioShock as being a take on Libertarianism specifically.

[-] Archelon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bioshock is most specifically about Randian objectivism, which promotes a version of extreme laissez-faire capitalism, not libertarianism in general.

And I think that’s the most economic philosophy buzzwords I’ve put in a sentence before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

I think you're severely overestimating the average intelligence of the population.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

I dunno how you could miss it in Spec Ops, that game is extremely blatant with messaging. I recently patient gamered it and was rather unimpressed. Bioshock still holds up though.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IMO it was a mistake to patient gamer Spec Ops. The whole point was that it was a pushback against the rhetoric of the US military and simultaneously a critique of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (and knockoffs thereof), which had just exploded in popularity. By not playing it when the things it was critiquing were in the zeitgeist, you don't really get the same experience. Plus, the marketing for the game deliberately hid the fact that it was intended as a critique; it was marketed as yet another modern military shooter.

[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I think you can patient gamer it but it only works if you're heavily familiar with that time.

I was really into COD4 and grew up during the Bush administration so I knew exactly what Spec Ops was critiquing. If you don't have that experience though I agree it does not land.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I didn’t like was the blunt messaging. I was expecting something a little deeper or more subtle than what I got. As a game, the clunky movement/cover system, simple enemy AI, and guns that just didn’t feel great hampered the experience. It’s very linear and there are forced choices (eg white phosphorus) that give you control but no choice but to be evil. The graphics are lackluster compared to its contemporaries, but I did enjoy the soundtrack at times. I really got into it with a few of those songs. Unfortunately that only happened a few times during the weekend I beat it in. It was okay, but I was expecting a lot more based on what people said about it.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Appropriately for the thread, the WP scene had a choice: walk away. It kept telling Walker to walk away. The player could have shut the game off.

That's the pivot point: if you're just playing a game about Walker, then having a choice doesn't matter, you're just being told a story about a lunatic. But, if Walker is a stand-in for you, and you're playing the game "because you wanted to be something you're not - a hero", then not only is playing on a choice, choosing to play war porn in the first place is a choice.

[-] legion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was expecting something a little deeper or more subtle than what I got.

That's the problem when these things gain reputations. The reputation builds it up to be more than the piece of art can deliver.

Now imagine playing it when it was new and you weren't "expecting" anything but a military shooter. It would still be just as blunt, but it landed back then far more effectively than when you go in knowing the reputation the game has built in the many years that followed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nima@leminal.space 31 points 1 year ago

Maybe because most people experience the art? and don't feel the need to inflate their ego by thinking their interpretation or experience is the best way to interpret something?

this feels like a bunch of nerds sitting around complaining that gamers miss stuff, while not understanding that most gamers don't miss it. they just experience it and don't feel the need to externalize it.

[-] Freeman@lemmings.world 39 points 1 year ago

Imo its the other way around. If you experience art, you think about it and try to get a meaning out of it (even if there is none, as in some modern art pieces). But if you just play a game you are not getting the art-aspect of it, you just enjoy it for the gameplay or maybe even the story but not for the deeper meaning.

[-] HiT3k@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. If the value of art were just "experiencing" it without processing it, there's an argument to be made that soulless blockbuster movies are as significant a piece of art as something with actual substance because so many people like the "experience."

People who do more than just "consume" the art in front of them are not just self righteous nerds (though many are, sure)... it's also a prerequisite to, you know, actually creating something of artistic value.

[-] Nima@leminal.space 4 points 1 year ago

how do you know I'm not appreciative of the art as I'm playing?

I've seen quite a lot of symbolism, meaning, and expressions through video games. but not every video game is made for artistic expression. they can be, to great effect IMHO.

either way, how the art is experienced is entirely up to the individual player. and there's no definitive way to experience art. that... kind of defeats the purpose of art, ya know?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lath@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Neat stuff.

That part’s wild to me, when people are like “This villain in your story seems to have said and done bad things? So that means you agree with them, yes?” No! Of course not! It’s the literal villain in the story, man!

But there is no utilitarian point of art. It exists to express ideas and to tell truth. I think maybe a lot of people get upset because from their point of view, they are paying money, and they have this relationship where it’s like “If it’s not giving me what I wanted out of this transaction, then it’s bad.”

[-] Justas@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago

To be honest, “If it’s not giving me what I wanted out of this transaction, then it’s bad.” is a heuristic that works well for most things we buy. If I buy candy and it doesn't taste good, it's bad. If I buy a car and it breaks down, it's bad.

I think the real problem is that some people see games as a product and others see it as an art piece. Some games fail at being either, some succeed at both.

[-] lath@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

A thread of the problem is likely the publisher/developer conflict of interest. When the two can't come to an agreement, the end result usually fails horribly in both aspects.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I hate those people who take content for validation. If I have a nazi in my story I am not, myself, also a nazi.

[-] Wooki@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Don’t go to the article, it’s click bait garbage

[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

A lot of people are just... not so bright. I remember seeing the video of all those trump supporters rocking out to "killing in the name of" by rage against the machine. Waving a thin blue line and american flag around with the lyrics blasting in the background.

Its the same with that new game Helldivers 2. Zero awareness.

[-] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I think this person means non partisan, because Metal Gear Solid is filled with political intrigue.

[-] dunestorm@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

People play games for escapism, not to be reminded of politics. Not every story needs deep political roots, people just want to have fun and forget about real world bullshit.

[-] Goronmon@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

That's why my favorite book is Moby Dick. No froo-froo symbolism, just a good, simple tale about a man who hates an animal.

[-] joneskind@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I like your style

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago

I kinda assumed people understood the messages behind Battlefield 1, Death Stranding, and Helldivers 2, lol. Most of the messages are telegraphed pretty clearly.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think this explains at least part of the phenomenon...

https://youtu.be/GkpgP8ovFZQ

[-] benignintervention@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Guilty as charged. I've played hundreds of hours of souls games and all I know about the lore is that souls are money

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Now compare that narrative experience the Super Mario Bros.

Im sure it's been done, but i would love to see interpretations of a First Time User Experience of OG mario if it came out today.

I cant tell you how many games ive just noped out of because i just want to actually play the game and not read or listen to either dialogue or forced tutorial railroading for 20+minutes (even 5 minutes of NOT being in control of what im doing is annoying) when you start a new game.

Even character creation can impede just wanting to get started. Let me come back later, or engage with that as i PLAY the game. Injecting extensive dialogue or forced interactive tutorial should be a reward or a much appreciated rest from the action, not a burden i must bare.

Not every game needs to be story rich to be fun, thank you vampire survivors

[-] Agora@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

16 Final Fantasy Games and the Earth is still getting consumed by us.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I feel like it also has to do with lots of games featuring elements of (or full-blown) violence as part of their regular gameplay loop.
Yeah, in Helldivers 2, you're committing genocide for insidious political reasons. But in Pokémon, you're committing genocide, because you're a ten year old and your neighbor gifted you a pet.

Normally, the genocide part would be the very obvious red flag for something political going on. Instead, you need to be aware of why precisely you're doing the genocide this time around.

Such genocide elements are usually also paired with fun gameplay (because violence is easy to translate into gameplay), and with a terrible story, so it's understandable that people would skip all the story elements.

[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Do we always want to play as the good guys? Are all actors to be prohibited from portraying bad guys? Is all media going to end up like Barney the Purple Dinosaur episodes? Games, movies, books, songs are supposed to be entertaining.

[-] morriscox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

what is your art if it’s not engaging with the issues of the time? What is your art if you’re claiming that it’s not political? Because the point of art is to tell the truth, and you’re lying.

Say what? Are they referring to just a specific type of art, like political art?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
190 points (100.0% liked)

Games

41193 readers
1549 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS