272

Live Updates: Prosecutors Say Trump’s Attacks Are Threat to Trial (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 5 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Other coverage for comparison:

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] yogi_pogi@lemmy.world 123 points 5 months ago

During jury duty, we got all sorts of shit for even whispering which court room we are going to. We were all numbers and even addressed ourselves as a number. And we were threatened repeatedly with fines and prison sentences.

This motherfucker gets to say whatever the fuck he wants and gets a bunch of verbal warnings and finger wagging.

This is why we lose trust in various govt systems

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 79 points 5 months ago

It's not just the special treatment. It's the fact that he's gonna turn around and say he's the one being treated poorly, and a good chunk of the population will agree, in spite of the plain evidence.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

"I'm being treated.. worse than Jesus!"

[-] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

One could only dream

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

And no judge has the balls to hold him in contempt like he's not a man facing felony charges.

[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago

I think him putting in the "I'm immune to criminal charges" argument into the courts hands has actually given him temporary immunity until it's decided. It's BS

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 95 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Maggie Haberman writes:

Todd Blanche [Trump's lawyer] says Trump is entitled to complain about “two systems of justice.” “There’s two systems of justice in this courtroom? That’s what you’re saying?” Justice Merchan says.

I mean, there are two systems of justice in this country, and he's always been part of the better one. If he wants to see what the rest of us would have to go though, by all means, let's try him under that system of justice.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 45 points 5 months ago

Yeah. If a non-billionaire (allegedly) tweeted out barely-veiled threats to jurors and witnesses and the judge's family that causes their friends to send death threats, you'd be in prison after you violated the gag order. Maybe not even get a gag order: just also charged with tampering.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago

So far this morning, it's all about the prosecution pushing for Contempt charges.

Justice Merchan has repeatedly pushed Todd Blanche to clarify his arguments, only to have Blanche deny that he is saying what he seems to be saying. Trump is very lucky that the jurors are not here for this. Merchan is really dressing down Blanche right now.

Blanche is Trump's lawyer (for those who didn't know)

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

As Blanche insists Trump is trying to follow with the rules, Merchan interrupts him. “You’re losing all credibility with the court,” he says.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago

Ouch. When a judge has to tell a defense lawyer that, things are not going well for the defense.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

Looking at the way this is going, I'm genuinely starting to wonder if Donald Trump ends up jailed for contempt sooner rather than later. It seems Merchan's patience has been exhausted.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

"Prosecutor Christopher Conroy has just said that prosecutors are not seeking jail time for Trump’s violations of the gag order.

We are not yet seeking incarceratory penalty. Defendant seems to be angling for that … We are asking the court to impose the maximum $1,000 fine for each violation."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/apr/23/trump-hush-money-trial-new-york-updates

"Defendant seems to be angling for that" ... so? Why are they taking into consideration what Trump wants? Just treat him like you would a black guy in Texas caught with a little weed.

[-] tiefling 3 points 5 months ago

Now why would they shoot Trump five times in the back while he lays on the ground unarmed?

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago

Nah, he'll get another paltry $5k fine that is unlikely to ever be paid.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago

Iirc NY law puts a $1000 cap on fines for contempt in criminal cases.

So the slap on the wrist will be even gentler than that.

If it happens at all.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 months ago

Jail and prison time are both possible though.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

11 occurrences so far so 11k

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

The prosecution made a point of not asking for any jail time in this hearing, but rather a warning that future violations will escalate to that. I don't think the Judge really wants to jail Trump while the trial is ongoing. Trump will get a hefty fine as well as that warning. Well see how long it takes for Trump to end up in Rikers.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

But why, though? Trump doesn't give a fuck about fines; time spent in jail is the only thing that has any chance of getting through to him because his wealth/grift can't solve it for him.

I'm willing to bet even just sending him to the holding cells in the couthouse for a couple hours each time he makes another out-of-order outburst would shut him up real quick.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

All a short term trip to jail would do is play into the Martyr complex that he and his supporters have. He would complain that he's not getting a fair trial, and low-information voters who are not paying attention will believe it.

While the judge doesn't care about Trump's political prospects, he does care that the trial is fair and that public perceptions don't make it into the jury's deliberations. But marching Trump off to a holding cell will be such an event that it would be impossible to keep it from the jury, and could give Trump a valid avenue for appeal.

However, if the judge establishes a paper trail that proves Trump was given every chance to comply, then it would make it harder for the appeal to succeed. Trump can't very well argue that the court is biased against him when they gave him extra opportunities to comply.

[-] jabeez@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago

He would complain that he’s not getting a fair trial, and low-information voters who are not paying attention will believe it.

He has and will continue to do this, and worse, and his cult will believe all of it, and worse. We cannot make decisions, especially not exceptions to laws, based on fears of how a fascist cult of supporters will react to it. They are going to do and say stupid/crazy shit, all the time, no matter what.

[-] pleasejustdie@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Because he wants to come off as a martyr to his base, and putting him in jail is exactly what he's aiming for to do that.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Can we try once? Just give him a night, let him know what he's up against?

[-] Shalakushka@kbin.social 5 points 5 months ago

They will make him one no matter what, deciding not to carry out justice out of fear of an angry and uninformed mob just puts decision making entirely in the hands of that mob.

[-] cammoblammo@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The Appellate Court likes to see that judges gradually escalate through the options, not just go straight for the harshest one available. It’s likely Marchan (and the prosecution) want to make this case as appeal-proof as possible.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

He wants to be jailed for contempt. The jail time for contempt ends before the election. All he has to do is sit in a cell/ home arrest and do nothing and his poll numbers will skyrocket. Most likely there is one or more republicans on the jury that will hung jury the actual verdict. Trump will walk out of prison with 11 to 1 voting to convict and go around saying "The jury found me innocent! The only reason I went to jail was because the judge is a liberal who abuses his power."

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Wrong. The longer trump sits in jail the less bullshit he can spew the less appearances he can make and the more guilty he looks.

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

You think he'll try to force a mistrial somehow?

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I mean, of course he's going to try to force a mistrial. It's not like he has a chance in hell of being found not guilty.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago

Juror #2 follows trump on truth social. Judy nullification is a very real possibility.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

At least we know the origin of fake news, it's the orange man himself.

[-] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago

Always was.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

Jeebus... Pecker would send Cohen articles before they were published so he could vet them. That's absolutely bananas.

[-] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

Is it? That bit seems the least outlandish, I'd guess that happens regularly to people in power and/or with a litigious streak.

[-] bquintb@midwest.social 25 points 5 months ago

when jail?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 23 points 5 months ago

Two possibilities:

The judge finds him guilty of contempt and orders a short jail term as punishment. Could happen any time now that he's heard arguments, but the prosecution didn't request it, so a $1000 fine is much more likely unless he keeps on violating the gag order.
The jury convicts him, and he's then sentenced to a significant term. This won't happen until the trial is over, several weeks hence

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Reality number 1: He avoids all responsibility. Avoids all punishment.

He has so far had a 100% success rate in avoiding jail time or any consequences. I hate the guy and wish that hell was real (I'll even go there too if it meant these kinds of people would) but I would never in a billion years bet against him avoiding punishment.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

I'm not saying you're wrong, but this is the case for everyone before they go to jail.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] zewm@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 24 points 5 months ago

I was curious about a specific term:

"In a pivotal stretch of testimony, David Pecker, the longtime publisher of The National Enquirer, described a 2015 meeting with Mr. Trump and his fixer at the time, Michael D. Cohen, at Mr. Trump’s midtown Manhattan headquarters.

Fixer
Noun
2. A person who uses influence or makes arrangements for another, especially by improper or unlawful means.

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Holy shit, I wish I could be watching this live. It looks like the prosecution brought all the receipts, including ones I never even knew existed. Pecker attended Trump's candidacy announcement in 2015, invited personally by Cohen, and the prosecution have the email to prove it.

That in itself isn't illegal, of course, but it completely undercuts any future attempt by the defense to argue that Pecker and Trump weren't close.

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 5 points 5 months ago

"Pecker? He was just the Chai Walla. I never even knew his name." More popcorn please.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

But it's him so the rules don't apply.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Seeing the latest updates, it appears David Pecker is actively throwing Trump under the bus. The increase in the level of communication between Pecker, Cohen, and Trump once Trump announced his candidacy is going to be really hard for the defense to explain away.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Things are getting spicy again. Pecker knows Karen McDougal.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Another hushed Playboy Playmate, for those who don't know.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

And now we've got a meeting in Trump Tower in August, with Hope Hicks present.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024

272 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18898 readers

2719 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News