988
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] interrobang 89 points 6 months ago

I've been halfheartedly saying I'm going to start a religion based on ads being bad for one's soul. It makes more sense every day.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

How do you intend to acquire a congregation?

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 24 points 6 months ago
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 6 months ago

If he tells you, he'd be advertising and that's against his religion.

[-] interrobang 13 points 6 months ago

Just live the principals and you're already a congregant, my child

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

well, they just picked up one follower.

[-] hairynipple@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago

By advertising. So it is now officially a religion since it's full of hypocrites.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] interrobang 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Lmao

I don't, i suppose

Word of mouth & direct delivery tablet cuneiform maybe, go old school

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 17 points 6 months ago

I'm a convert. Who wants to write our hymns?

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

do it so we can claim anti ad blocker measures are discriminatory

[-] ManniSturgis@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Your move Satanist church.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 6 months ago

"The real money is in starting a religion." - L. Ron Hubbard

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 82 points 6 months ago

Not just for security, selling snake oil is also grounds for ad blocking.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 93 points 6 months ago

I don't need "grounds" for ad blocking, and neither do you. My property rights say that I'm entitled to modify the computation my system is doing as I see fit.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 44 points 6 months ago

We shoud have a right to not have commercials shoved down our eye and ear holes. If they could, they would force it down our throats and noses too.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 19 points 6 months ago

If they could, they would force it down our throats and noses too.

Throats are still safe (for now?), but hate to break it to you about noses: https://dennisfoodservice.com/the-smells-that-make-customers-spend-more/

(Warning: has an autoplaying video at the very bottom).

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 13 points 6 months ago

I swear I will just stick with paperback books for all entertainment if they continue to further infect my current forms of entertainment. Lets seem them try to insert an unskippable ad into a paperback book.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Please watch the ad on the included smart book accessory device to dispense the solvent that will un-glue the next 10 pages"

Relevant Simpsons Joke:

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 6 points 6 months ago

You have discovered the thing that may finally radicalize me.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We already have ad books. They're called magazines, just give it a couple more years and regular books will be filled with ads too. I've already encountered some regular books that have an insert talking about another book from the same creator. Sure it doesn't seem bad now but soon it'll be an insert about a friend of the creator, then about the same company that did this book, then in similar genres, then more inserts about products that might make your book reading experience better, etc etc.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ManniSturgis@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 months ago

I will stick to emulating 30 year old video game consoles and fan reimplementations like OpenMW and OpenRCT2. I am driven by pure spite. They will never get me!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Property rights are those rights, and we already have them. The issue is that the copyright cartel is trying to take them away from us. They are colonizing our devices with DRM + the DMCA anti-circumvention clause in an attempt to reduce us to techno-serfdom.

Ad-blocking, Free Software, Right to Repair (also a right we already have, not a new one we need), "you will own nothing ~~and be happy~~" propaganda , etc. are all just different aspects of the same issue: the corporate war against property rights.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] marcos@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

No way they can be the same.

The adblock stops malware, makes my browser perform better, and stops things from disrupting me. The most common result of anti-virus the complete opposite of each of those 3.

[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago

I cannot express how much I loathe antivirus software. Mostly it's been because it has been nothing but trouble in my work environment, without ever catching anything, for over twenty years. It's the modern corporate snake oil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

simple, don't use an antivirus, stick to windows defender (before the linux crowd comes in yes I know there are basically no viruses threatening you chill), your own brain, and also not an admin account!

Don't download shady shit, and if your PC asks you for some mysterious admin permission - the answer is "no". If something does slip through windows defender will most likely handle it no problem!

[-] lengau@midwest.social 11 points 6 months ago

Ugh Linux... I tried so hard to get viruses working in wine but in the end I gave up. Full compatibility my ass...

[-] Zangoose@lemmy.one 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Linux gets viruses too (see recent xz-utils vulnerability that almost got into production environments) and its kind of a shame that corporate antivirus software like Norton and McAfee end up ruining the reputation of antiviruses. In theory the idea of having a software that can scan for common viruses is a great way to increase security, even if it shouldn't replace common sense. I'm not too sure if there are any good FOSS antiviruses, but if there aren't there should be.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 32 points 6 months ago

If I saw a popup tell me to disable my antivirus Id nope out of there even faster than the ones that demand I disable my ad blocker.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 16 points 6 months ago

Yep. I see popups asking to disable adblocker the same way as that.

[-] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 6 months ago

Please enable javascript to view this static content.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Emmie@lemm.ee 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

A good Adblock is a digital equivalent of an armored car. You can go everywhere, comfortably. Visit the most terrible sites or places. All this time protected from the bullets of capitalism.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 23 points 6 months ago

I swear I'm about done with YT. The ads are long, overabundant, irrelevant, and timed specifically to fuck with people in the middle of specific segments of content. I mean, I keep getting ads for Oppenheimer for the past four days. I already own Oppenheimer - and Google knows this. My Google account is linked to my MoviesAnywhere account, they have this information. What is the point of "targeted" advertisements if they net the advertiser zero value? Is Google just messing with users trying to block their ads at this point?

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 56 points 6 months ago

Haven't seen ads in ages... Firefox on linux with uBlock origin.

[-] 30p87@feddit.de 11 points 6 months ago

Also, Firefox Nightly with uBlock on Android, and Piped as frontend for YouTube anyway.

[-] red_rising@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Half the point of ads these days isn’t to advertise to you, it’s to piss you off enough to upgrade to a paid plan. If they happen to also make money from the adverts, then that’s just an added bonus.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 8 points 6 months ago

I'll never pay. I've spent so much money of failed Google products at this point they owe me YT premium for life. If they make bypassing ads impossible I'll just stop watching.

[-] red_rising@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I feel the same. I don’t do ads. If a product doesn’t have an ad-free product that I’m willing to pay for, then that product doesn’t exist for me. Similarly, if a paid product decides to introduce ads (I’m looking at you Amazon) I’m immediately cancelling.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] th3raid0r@tucson.social 12 points 6 months ago

I used to subscribe to YouTube premium as of just a few days ago. Even without the ads. There was something very seriously wrong with the suggestion algorithm.

I was getting cartel violence videos, and dead animal videos. Never watched one before in my life. Yet. YouTube seems to think that I should want to watch this crock of shit. This started coming up about 6 months ago. Until now I've been reporting each video as they come up. But that doesn't seem to help at all.

At this point I think YouTube is a danger to society - if it's recommending cartel violence videos to me unsolicited, what are they suggesting to my nieces?

I have completely nuked it from my life. Almost all of the YouTubers I like are on Nebula or Floatplane so it doesn't feel like I'm missing much.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Some of the sponsored shit is crazy too.

I was watching a video on a timeline of events with Puff Daddy and it hit this one part that went something like, “the young man said that Diddy wanted to play with his anus. Which reminds me of our sponsor, the law offices of so and so. Life is unpredictable and you or your loved ones could get molested too. If that happens you’ll need legal representation! Our sponsor will represent you…”.

Holy shit my brain shorted on that one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

As a sysadmin I have so many devs asking me to set up antivirus exceptions for their apps, disable UAC, run the service as full admin, etc

Hell no. Submit your shit to virus total and learn how to program.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago

Antivirus programs are way too inaccurate to be used authoritatively, especially for developers. It’s not uncommon that some virus will use a well-known open source library or packaging tool, and then the antivirus decides that any binary with that same library or stub from that packaging tool must also be a virus. When your program depends on it, if you can’t turn the AV off or make an exception, you’re just fucked. Also, programming is an iterative process. Make a small change, test, repeat. Requiring that developers upload and wait for a scan from some third party for software that they compiled locally and have no intent to distribute is a giant waste of everybody’s time, especially the developer’s. It’s a huge drag on productivity for the sake of bureaucracy.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 10 points 6 months ago

Nah, the heuristics shit picks up a shedload of nothing as dodgy sometimes. No-one submits work in progress stuff to be accepted with the antivirus providers to bypass that. Only final versions.

Don't have a problem where I work. Likely the choice of antivirus, or they're whitelisting our development folders automatically.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago

You clearly don’t know how programming works. Or how idiotic most antivirus software is.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

When apps have code obfuscation in use, injects into dlls, and has detection for when running in a vm when it has no business doing any of these things then yes I think I can complain to the devs about it.

[-] mofongo@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Windows defender is a Little jumpy though when it comes to self compiled software other than Visual Studio‘s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 6 months ago

Don't be silly. Wrap your willy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] devilish666@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

What website that ask you to disable antivirus ? Capt ?

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 28 points 6 months ago

They don't, because it would be an insane proposition. The point of the meme is to say that asking to disable my ad blocker is like asking me to disable my antivirus.

Ad companies don't or very poorly vet their submissions, and it's incredibly easy for malicious actors to slip hostile code in through ads. Ad blockers prevent that and are a first line of defense.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
988 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

19572 readers
913 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS