220
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 79 points 1 year ago

please only make your voices 'heard' in the designated free speech zones.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago

It's wild that these actually exist in some public places.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

There's one in the Mojave desert, one in northern Alaska, and one in Antartica, so that everyone is covered.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 year ago

Key take away

To Kavanagh, the crime wasn’t just about blocking traffic. It was “steal[ing] hours of [people’s] lives away.”

Hot Take: If Kavanagh feels so strongly about this. Then make wage theft a felony because it is literally stealing people's time and it's a far larger problem than a few blocking a road.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Pretty good idea. Especially for larger companies where they have less of an argument that it was a mistake.

[-] Nach@midwest.social 50 points 1 year ago

This would include 'Freedom Convoy' style trucker blockades too, right?

[-] Ooops@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

No, only peasants on foot trying to annoy our wheeled overlords and their owners.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Of course not. Freedom for me and not for thee.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

Hell hath no fury like white people mildly inconvenienced

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

"Lawmakers" don't want this, "corporate interests funding lawmakers" want this

[-] SnotFlickerman 27 points 1 year ago

Nevermind the hundreds of thousands of people socially murdered by US/EPA negligence. Those people were interrupted from going to their jobs and making money for rich twats. Don't people know that's so much more important than *checks notes... you getting cancer in your thirties?

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

No one stands in the way of the almighty car

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Good. Block ambulances -> go to jail. Plenty of legal ways to make your voice heard.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

There's I believe one example of that in the us and they were charged under the relevant currently existing law that makes willfully blocking emergency vehicles a crime.

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

So anyone in standstill traffic when an ambulance comes will go to jail? Or does this not apply if you're in a car?

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

In my opinion, if you knowingly block or don't have good faith in attempting to move away, it should be illegal.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

To everyone saying that this shouldn't be a protected form of protest, explain why blocking traffic is bad, but this wasn't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sit-in_movement

[-] SqueakyBeaver 7 points 1 year ago

Probably something about either how it affects them directly so that protest is bad. Also possibly about shipping

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 14 points 1 year ago

'Bout time. This isn't free speech. If everyone with a grievance brought a city to a standstill, we'd have anarchy.

I fully support peaceful protesters with signs on the sidewalk even if I don't with their cause. But their rights end when they infringe on others.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

If people protest and it inconveniences or offends nobody, is it a protest?

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

While I think this style of protest is completely counterproductive and just pisses everyone off rather than bring them to your side, a felony for doing it is fucking insane. You can't lump murder and standing in the road into the same category of offense.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

If you think people's rights are secondary to your commute, fuck your commute in particular.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 8 points 1 year ago

You don't have a right to commit crime. If they think their opinion is more important because they're being the bigger asshole, fuck them in particular.

I think that guy, recently in the news, pleading with protesters so he wasn't late to court would take issue if someone summed up the critically his life at the moment so dismissively as "a commute".

People don't stop their lives because someone throws a tantrum. You made it others problems; now the courts whom represent those affected will have a legal option.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Oh yes a tantrum. Let's see what people have been blocking streets for lately.

  • Genocide in Gaza
  • Police killing unarmed people
  • Chinese treatment of Uyghurs.
  • Gun laws after Mass Shootings

Yup, just tantrums here. Nothing of substance at alllll.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

If you want protests to stop, address the issues being protested.

You cheer for dogs and firehoses and rubber bullets and tear gas instead.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't want all protests to stop. It's a way to express your view publicly.

What does need to stop is the childish selfishness of this civel disobedience to forcibly impose your will over others. The cause doesn't matter; civilized society can't exist if every activist for every cause uses this to make a point.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I don’t want all protests to stop. It’s a way to express your view publicly.

You just don't want them to be inconvenient. So you can ignore them. So nothing will change. Like you want.

What does need to stop is the childish selfishness of this civel disobedience to forcibly impose your will over others.

Yeah, who do people who want cops to stop shooting them think they are?

The cause doesn’t matter;

Certainly never to you. You love the status quo and never want it to change.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You just don't want them to be inconvenient. So you can ignore them. So nothing will change. Like you want.

In my city, there is a guy with a megaphone shouting into traffic nearly every day. Annoying, but I support his right to be there. In another nearby, there is a section known for protests and signs every weekend with dozens of participants. I support their right to assemble. There is a diehard Trumper who absolutely plastered their front yard with signs. I recognize their right as an American. And I have written 3 letters to my local government this year. I have signed ballot initiatives brought forth by organizations I support. This is how you change a democracy.

Yeah, who do people who want cops to stop shooting them think they are?

That's a great argument until you substitute in a cause you don't support. Hmm, what would people be saying if some pro-January 6th-ers took over the bridge?

Certainly never to you. You love the status quo and never want it to change.

We're always changing. It is natural. However, I refrain from emotional decisions and tend to break problems down to their cores. The "cause", whatever it may be, is an emotional trigger employed to justify a course of illegal action. I am entirely unaffected. I have, instead, viewed this event from the perspective of rational logic. This is unacceptable behavior. Period.

Also, side note, thanks for the debate. I really enjoyed it, but I got to sleep. :)

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That’s a great argument until you substitute in a cause you don’t support. Hmm, what would people be saying if some pro-January 6th-ers took over the bridge?

It happened in my town. Remember the Trump Trains? Blocked traffic for miles.

I get that you don't like people wanting to do something effective that might draw attention to their cause and are trying to use trumpists as an excuse, but here's the thing: Cops won't enforce this consistently. Trumpists will still be allowed to march, but people cops disagree with won't. I have no doubt that this is the only reason you support making protesters felons, nor do I think that this will stop with protests in the street.

We’re always changing.

And you're fine with that as long as it keeps being for the worse and no one adds any minutes to your precious commute. You want to make people felons on the off chance that you might have to choose an alternate route one day. Your commute is not that important.

I am entirely unaffected.

Then act like it and stop supporting making protesting in a way that hurts your feelings a felony.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So when forced-birth activists block the road to an abortion clinic, then the best way to stop that is to address their issues?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There are already laws against harassment. We don't need to make anyone who marches in the streets a felon.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not talking about harassment. Simply protestors blocking all traffic on a street that has an abortion clinic.

Is it good for democracy when pregnant women can't drive to their appointment?

While we're at it, what about climate deniers blocking access to public chargers, thus stranding anyone using an EV?

Or right-wingers who block off access to bike lanes just to "pwn the libs."

All of these have already happened, by the way. Were they good for democracy?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

If you can bring the city to a standstill with your grievance then someone should probably do something about the grievance before that mob removes the mayor by force.

Closing one road is not bringing a city to a standstill. We haven't had true mass protests in the US in a long time.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

You don't have a right to drive so....

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

If everyone with a grievance brought a city to a standstill, we’d have anarchy.

If everyone made visible in the streets, the injustice that exists in our governance, we'd have democracy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck cars in general.

Trains, subways & trams please.

Also, I would not be surprised if the auto industry is who's lobbying for this, people won't buy cars if they have no where to drive.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That’s not really the point.

Imagine a world where we didn’t fuck up public transit and protesters stood in subway doors to block them, preventing the trains from running.

Still just free speech and should be allowed to continue?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
220 points (100.0% liked)

News

31486 readers
2839 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS