548
submitted 8 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

WASHINGTON — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has filed a motion to oust Speaker Mike Johnson, three sources with knowledge of the move told NBC News, doing so just as the House voted to avoid a government shutdown.

Johnson, R-La., has served as speaker for five months, having taken over for Kevin McCarthy who was ousted from the top job under a similar process.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 200 points 8 months ago

I wonder how the GOP has any toes left after shooting themselves in the foot so often.

[-] MunkyNutts@lemmy.world 70 points 8 months ago

Gotta be a MTG toe joke in there somewhere.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 79 points 8 months ago

Her inbred ass had enough extra toes to hold them over for a while.

[-] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 19 points 8 months ago

There it is lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

"'n this foot right here I call Ol' Stumpy"

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

"Sir, that is your exposed femur."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 103 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

At what point do a few Republicans not running for re-election just say "Fuck it" and vote for Hakeem Jeffries? The margin is down to what, three flips? McCarthy being so thirsty for the job that he let them change the rules has fucked them over, because Ted Cruz et al made government shutdowns and other refusals to do routine shit such a losing national issue for the GOP that once in the job, even Christian-Nationalist ideologues like Johnson have to "betray the principles" of idiots like MTG, Gaetz, and Boebert.

[-] sygnius@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Because of the rule change, it's going to fuck over Dems too when they take over Speaker of the House. Reps are just going to oust every single Dem elected to the position every single day. All they need is one vote to challenge the Speaker. I really hope they nullify the rule.

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago

I don’t think those are House rules. Those are the rules they made for themselves. Democrats don’t have to abide by this. That’s my understanding at the moment. Feel free to correct me.

[-] festus@lemmy.ca 42 points 8 months ago

I think they are house rules, but a majority of Congress can changes those rules at any time. So if Democrats take the house they can just reverse it as part of installing a new speaker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Pretty sure those are house rules. I think they are agreed upon at the beginning of every session of congress. They can likely be changed with a simple majority but the handful of fucking-batshit-insane GOP don't want to give up that power. I can't imagine Dems just holding onto that rule when it should just be an ~~essay~~ easy vote to revert back to what it was.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hansl@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

The just plain wrong. When you vote for speaker you also vote the rules in. Dems will not vote for the same set of rules and likely go back to a traditional and more sane set of rules.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 96 points 8 months ago

I can't wait for 37 more ballots of Hakeem Jeffries almost winning.

[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

Needs exactly four Republicans House Reps to do what I could only describe as the funniest thing ever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 88 points 8 months ago

An election year is a great time to blow up the only part of the government your party controls... I say let them flight.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 80 points 8 months ago

when is someone putting this screaming gibbon back in her cage?

[-] chknbwl@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

But who will be our representative for Jewish Space Lasers?? Imagine the atrocities of such an unchecked system!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 80 points 8 months ago

I guess he was getting too close to finally agreeing that Ukraine needs some more support.

[-] Lilith_the_serpent@lemmy.world 67 points 8 months ago

Hahahahaha!... takes deep breath .. HAHAHAHAHA! 🤣🤣🤣

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

Even better… they’re loosing their majority fast. Heard somebody else resigned and they’re down to one

[-] Lightsong@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 65 points 8 months ago

Poor guy. He appeared to be completely unfit for the job, had to walk a super tightrope about not pissing off his own crazy party, and still got nuked by one of the craziest / stupidest members of his team. Can you imagine the stress? Fuck him. Let him stress. Wretched piece of shit.

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

His son better be keeping a close eye on his browsing history in the coming months. Can't have him masturbating his stress away.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

I have no sympathy for evangelicals in the federal government.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 53 points 8 months ago

I keep posting this, but it never gets old

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 52 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

I was about to ask why she would do such a thing but then I remembered to my dismay that asking why mtg does shit is like asking a flat earther why they think the earth is flat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago

Ha! It’s so funny when they eat themselves alive.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 8 months ago

I don't think that legislation can move forward in a scenario where there isn't a Speaker. That impacts everyone.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Dems should make a deal with Johnson. They will throw him a few votes in exchange to allow Jeffries the ability to schedule votes. That way both parties decide what things to hold votes about.

[-] cqst 50 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No democrat should ever vote to leave this bigot in the succession line to the presidency.

Some fun things Mike Johnson has done:

Called us a "depraved culture" for having high LGBTQ identification:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/11/mike-johnson-america-depraved-high-school-students

Made his daughter pledge her virginity to him at a "purity ball":

https://abcnews.go.com/US/speaker-mike-johnson-daughter-profiled-attending-purity-ball/story?id=105785626

And just read what he has to say about gay marriage:

https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-times-kfile/134019997/

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

No. Dems just need like 1 Republican to vote for Jeffries. At this point there may be enough Republicans furious with the extreme nut jobs to form a "not batshit crazy" coalition with the Dems.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

While a lot of people are speculating about how this could lead to a Democrat speaker, I think the more likely scenario is that the Dems vote to keep him in office as long as he stops obstructing the most critical stuff, specifically Ukraine aid. Republicans alone are extremely unlikely to oust Johnson, and a failed attempt to do so only weakens the nutjobs.

MTG is practically handing the Dems the leverage they need to force Johnson to compromise. And if he won't they need only find three moderate / retiring Republicans willing to pick a more reasonable speaker.

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 25 points 8 months ago

the Dems vote to keep him in office as long as he stops obstructing the most critical stuff, specifically Ukraine aid.

He'll agree, then backstab the Democrats the moment they try to get anything done. You can't trust that filthy fuck.

they need only find three moderate / retiring Republicans willing to pick a more reasonable speaker.

I think this is both a better strategy for Democrats and a more likely outcome than Johnson keeping his word.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

you live laugh love to see it.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Republican house speakers have the life expectancy of a house fly thanks to the treason caucus.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 18 points 8 months ago

Here we go again...for fooks sake!

[-] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just when you think you're in control

Just when you think you've got a hold

Just when you get on a roll...

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago

Gotta love the Christian nationalist infighting.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Wouldn't we only need one Republican defector now to have Democrats control the House?

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

I could be wrong, but I think it's 3. With the Colorado guy quitting (to specifically fuck over Lauren Boebert), they're at 218-213 I think.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Ken Buck's last day is today. So tomorrow, they will be at 218-213 with 4 vacancies.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bomberesque1@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago

Hahahahahahahahaha

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago

At this point, I think the job of the Speaker of the House is going to be a position most politicians wouldn't want to touch.

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

Democrats seem to do a fine job of managing their caucus when they have the gavel.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
548 points (100.0% liked)

News

23376 readers
1883 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS