345
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago

So, now we get to see how many “blue no matter who”’s actually meant it.

Remember folks, it applies to anyone who might be the candidate.

That over…. Harris/AOC or Harris Whitmer !!

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

You think people are lying about that? Weird.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"I Know you don't like MY candidate, but you know... Blue No Matter WHO!!!!! You don't want a fascist to win, do you?"

people are absolutely lying about it. the question is... how many.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

You've not convinced me. I don't know why anyone would use that argument if it completely betrayed their feelings. Plenty others you could use which make more sense

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Uhhuh.

You don’t believe people can be manipulative assholes? Or that they lie?

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Of course they can. But in this case I see no motivation to tell that particular lie

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

You don’t see the motivation to push your preferred candidate onto people? To manipulate people who disagree with that choice?

Or to manipulate an entire base?

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Oh no, they manipulated the entire democratic base to vote democratic!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Great argument on the day of the Election Day.

Lousy argument during primaries. It’s the kind of argument that gave us a Hillary candidacy when anyone who wasn’t deluded knew she’d lose. (An anti-establishment platform against the one person who embodies “the establishment”- and not in a good way?)

It’s the kind of argument that gives us fucking manchin or menendez, too.

But making that argument during the primary? Before the nominee has ever been decided? Naw. If they were serious, it wouldn’t matter so much and they’d let the best candidate win.

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 14 points 3 months ago

If the blue pick is a broken toaster oven, I'm still voting for it rather than tump

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

I'd vote for a battered cardboad cutout of Reagan over Trump. Hell. I'd vote for a cardboard cut out of trump over trump.

(cardboard cut outs can't talk.)

[-] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Kamala all the way! It won't be AOC or Whitmer though. Most likely Kelly or Newsom. AOC is the future, though.

[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Newsome cannot and will not be the VP. Harris is also from California, which would cause issues in the electoral college. Electors cannot cast both the Presidential and vice-presidential ballot for someone from the same state as themselves. Because both Harris and Newsome are form California, it could cause issues, and they might not get the electoral votes from California.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

so what debate one-liners are you putting on your bingo card?

[-] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

"Lock him up!" <-- If she doesn't fucking say this so help me god...

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

My bing card is “slaps cuffs on him during the debate.”

[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I doubt Newsome, you wouldn't want both from California

[-] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Very good point! Kelly then? That's my top pick.

[-] Glifted@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think AOC isn't old enough to be VP. I don't say that as a matter of opinion. I think you have to be at least 40

Edit: it's actually 35, but AOC is 34 so I was partially correct

However I think the relevant language is:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

So maybe it's okay for VP

[-] SqueakyBeaver 9 points 3 months ago

AOC's birthday is this October, so I believe she would be eligible just in time lol

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

She’ll be old enough to be POTUS by inauguration.

So, she’s probably old enough to be VPOTUS…

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Irrelevant. The Democrats would never put a progressive in a position where they could be president. They'll probably go for a centrist like Shapiro or a corporate Dem like Newsom. I'm hoping that they'll go with Whitmer but they'll probably shy away from a two woman ticket.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It's relevant to the question of if she's old enough, which is a fair question given she's on the cusp. Even if only theoretically.

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

If the ticket is something messed up like Harris/Bob Menendez, or Harris/Blagoyavich, I might have some reservations, but would quickly look past them considering the alternative.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Only problem I have with menendez is that I’m too broke to buy him off.

(I suspect the people who don’t have a problem with him… are rich enough. Funny how that works.)

[-] Sarothazrom@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

As much as I'd love to see it in my lifetime, no way she chooses a female VP. Way too risky.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Did you vote for H Clinton, though? I bet not.

[-] Sarothazrom@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

What gives you the idea I didn't?

[-] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Your vibe only

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Before I left home this morning, I pointed to the bottle of mustard on the table and told my girl that I would vote for the mustard. We were talking about the rumors of Biden dropping out.

At least the mustard is honest about its color. So are carrots, for that matter. I'd totally vote for a carrot.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Turnips too.

What kinda carrot? Chatennay or Danvers?

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yup, I'll vote for any garden vegetable except for cucumbers and their squash and watermelon relatives. Will make an exception for pickles, they're one of the good ones.

Don't know much about carrot varieties other than Queen Anne's lace is a wild carrot. Know more about taters and tomatoes.

Figure any real carrot would do. I'd totally vote for a beefsteak or better boy tomato over a carrot, however.

[-] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Have you tried a grafted cherry tomato/white potato plant? I've been looking at trying it out just because growing two produces with "one plant" seems really interesting to me and I've read a bit about how they're closely related enough that you can graft the tomato to the top of the potato plant.
Also trying to get more people into container gardening and it seems like a good space saver.

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I haven't tried it. Seems like a gimmick.

I'm not a big fan of container gardening. From the deep south, container gardening is for places where the sun won't dry and burn the roots.

Grew up working on a tater farm. Sweet taters and Irish taters.

We're in process of moving further north and my girl is excited to try container gardening again.

A plant takes in a certain amount of energy and turns part of that into fruit or root storage. You can't really get anything for free.

I prefer heirloom seed or hardware start plants grown traditionally.

It's been a long time since I've grown much of anything other than cacti, native ornamentals, and fungi. It's a kind of work I swore off for a long time.

Just bought a play farm, will probably grow some tomatoes. Have apple trees, blueberries, and a small vineyard I need to learn.

[-] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I have a tiny yard in the south and it's pretty much paved so container is the only way I can go until (if?) I manage to buy a house with a plantable area. Currently have some citrus in containers producing, a bunch of basil, tomatoes, and some various sprawlers like squash. I wish I had the space to put them all in the ground but I gotta work with what I have. Usually use heirloom seeds or hardware starter plants but gotta pick varieties that are good for containers so I don't get that many options. I figured that potatoes would still be productive in the seasons when tomatoes aren't growing on the branches due to heat or cold but I could be wrong since i'm still learning a lot.

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Northern and central Alabama myself. Tater experience from central AL.

I've heard of people having great results with container tomatoes by taking the drip line of the AC unit and piping it into the tomatoes roots. Keeps the roots very cool.

Taters have a long season, plant just after frost is done. Blackberry Winter is no longer a constant due to climate change.

To try and do taters in containers, I would build my conainers from cinder blocks and fill the blocks with dirt or other insulation. 4' wide at a minimum and however long you want/have space/can afford. This would be for one row. Paint the blocks white. Bury a soaker hose down the center. Put the hose on a timer and adjust for high temps. You'll have to fight fungal infection due to the higher moisture so it would be delicate. I would treat with antifungal at intervals through the hose. Taters need more sand than you would think in the soil, especially if you have clay soil.

[-] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Most of the container potato setups I see use a lot of sand and straw which I thought would help with the fungal growth, though they're usually set up in something like a large trash can with an air layer of insulation around since it hold heat less than rocks but the white block idea with sunken drip line sounds intriguing. We get a lot of clay in my area, but it's also pretty rainy most of summer so I would probably need some sort of sensor in the soil to figure out when it's dried enough for more watering. Thanks for the response!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Do you grow tomatoes? Have you tried a brandywine? They’re balanced between sweet and tart. Love ‘em on a good burger.

Oxhearts are great for sauces (they have fewer seeds and a strong flavor.)

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

My favorites are the cherry tomatoes- can’t make up my mind on a single best, though. Blomdkopfchen roast amazing well (or grill!) where Amy’s Apricots do well in salads. Want to get my hands on some black cherries, though.

Chadwick’s are of course the old stand by in my greenhouse.

If you like beefsteaks, have you tried brandywine? They’re our favorite burger slicer here. (And oxhearts for saucing)

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I think you're responding to yourself.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

No idea how that happened. Gonna leave that up though.

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Mostly copied from above response.

Grew up working on a tater farm. Sweet taters and Irish taters.

We're in process of moving further north and my girl is excited to try container gardening again.

I prefer heirloom seed or hardware start plants grown traditionally.

It's been a long time since I've grown much of anything other than cacti, native ornamentals, and fungi. It's a kind of work I swore off for a long time.

Just bought a play farm, will probably grow some tomatoes. Have apple trees, blueberries, and a small vineyard I need to learn.


Have always heard good things about Brandywine tomatoes.

Won't be this year, but we'll be trying some varieties.

Roma, we called Romies, were my favorite as a kid. Canned tomato soup and sauce always smelled amazing and the stuff in stores doesn't compare.

Best judge of a tomato is to slice it up, add too much salt, and eat it with a fork.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Or Harris Wittels, best of both worlds, AND the afterlife.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
345 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19132 readers
3560 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS