975
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

PS.

I would for vote Kamala. I would vote for a cactus with sunglasses if it had the Democratic nomination. You would do yourself well to consider anything that is weaking the resolve of the anti-trump sentiment straight poison to your brain. We have only one job this novemeber and that is to stop trump. The Supreme Court has given him the status of king. Quit acting like your vote is sacred and start realizing your vote is your final cry before your rights are forfeited.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

It's not about that. It's about sleep walking into fascism. Before the debate it was metaphorical. If you keep voting for the lesser evil you still get evil. It just takes longer.

Now we're being asked to vote for someone who clearly cannot handle the duties of the office and is nothing more than a figurehead. Rubber stamping this does not protect democracy. It proves they can manufacture consent to put whoever they want in that office and you guys will keep pulling that lever thinking, "it could be worse".

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 24 points 4 months ago

and is nothing more than a figurehead

Fine by me.

Come November, I will not be voting for an old guy named Biden. I will be voting for the Biden administration, an administration that rejoined the Paris climate accords, has made progress wrt medical debt, has seen decreasing levels of uninsured Americans, and made progress on myriad other issues. Because the alternative is...well, you know.

I am not voting for my ideal candidate, or my ideal administration, but that's because 1) I'm not an accelerationist, and 2) I'm smart enough to know how this works given our deeply flawed voting system.

I'm not sure you can really have it both ways


the only alternatives for someone who doesn't want Trump but won't vote for Biden that I see are accelerationism, or complete and utter naivety...which is functionally equivalent to accelerationism.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I don't agree that those are the only avenues left. Biden is vulnerable to a replacement campaign now. We can sidestep the entire thing. Get a good admin and a president strong enough to fight the inevitable reactionary shit from red states.

[-] wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net 20 points 4 months ago

Ok so let's have Trump instead?

No, thanks. Vote for Biden so that we don't have to repeat the fallout of 2016.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Vote for anyone but Biden, Trump, and RFK.

We aren't too close to November to replace him.

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Ah yes a figure head of the party who did all this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/WhatBidenHasDone/comments/1abyvpa/the_complete_list_what_biden_has_done/

Is just as bad as the figure head of a fascist, xenophobic, racist, authoritarian, nationalist, religious zealot party because they are both figureheads. You're right.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I'm not even going to start with a list put together by his base. The news can't put one together that doesn't get ripped to shreds once you actually look at it. I doubt his base has put together anything like a list that says what the policies actually do. And no the title of the bill or the PR elevator pitch has no relation to what it actually does. For example he actually severely cut EV subsidies and you all fell on your knees to thank him for it.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Give his base a little more credit than that. They aren't dumb enough to list the inflation reduction act, they call it environmental legislation.

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Literally your best argument against this NOT ALL OF THOSE ARE REAL BECAUSE HIS SUPPORTERS COMPILED IT SO IMMA VOTE FOR A FACIST RACIST

You're fucking wild bro

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I never said I was going to vote for Trump.

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

If your not voting, voting 3rd party, or voting for Trump ....any of those is a vote for Trump in America's presidential election.

Also your name is maggoty so...

And let's not get distracted from the main point by straw manning here. Your argument is ridiculous.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

No. No they aren't. The only vote for Trump is an actual vote for Trump. Casting anyone who doesn't support you as an other who must support the bad guy was bullshit when Bush did it and it's bullshit now.

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

No it isn't. It's literally math and logic deduction. It's the bullshit two party system's failings.

Because you only have 2 options who are going to pull enough votes to win, throwing your vote to a 3rd party is taking a vote from biden. not voting is taking a vote from biden. all of that is equal to a vote for Trump.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Sure thing your majesty. We'll all support you no matter what.

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Only a vote for Trump is a vote for Trump.

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It's not. Google a first past the post system and learn something. Your spouting bullshit that is reductive and intentionally inaccurate

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I'm well aware of the different voting types. I'm also well aware that you cannot browbeat the citizenry into liking your candidate. That is the base feature of a democracy.

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

You aren't well aware of math apparently.

He's not my candidate, I just have the mental capacity to understand that it's the only choice I have in this system if I'm not a maggot trump supporter.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You know you've got to figure if someone has taken a name like Maggot, they aren't going to be insulted if you use it...

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Oh so you are a trump supporter then? Makes sense how you can't grasp simple concepts and constantly argue in bad faith.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Lmao. You'd like that but no.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

this is election misinformation. only a vote for trump can be counted as a vote for trump. a vote for any other candidate cannot be counted for trump.

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

when are votes for anyone but trump allowed to be counted for trump?

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

When you have a 2 party system no other candidate will ever do anything except cannibalize votes from the party they overlap the most with.

Green party takes votes from Democrats and libertarians take votes from Republicans.

Read the federalist papers. The founding fathers saw this reality coming. First past the post voting with 2 dominant parties means 3rd party voting or apathy is a vote for your opponent

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

this entire comment is obfuscation. I asked a specific question in response to a specific claim.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Green party takes votes from Democrats

this is a myth. votes Don't belong to the Democrats. they belong to the voters. it's up to candidates to earn votes.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

3rd party voting or apathy is a vote for your opponent

no, it's a vote for the so-called third party or no vote at all.

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

You’re right, and I’m getting real sick of the “shut up and fall in line” demand from democrats.

In this current system, EVERY election now will always be “the most important one ever”, with fascism at the front door and our democracy being at stake.

When the options are between (insert every terrible adjective that accurately describes him here) Trump, and ‘guy with obvious mental decline’ Biden, the blame doesn’t lie with the voter. If Joe Biden can’t earn people’s votes, the responsibility lies with Joe Biden and the Democrat establishment.

There are millions of leftist voters in this country who are being ignored by the two parties, and the democrats are hostile toward them and don’t want to move left to gain their votes. The leftist voters then get villainized by dems for seeking out a third party that better aligns with their values. “How dare you not fall in line! A vote for a third party is a vote for Trump!” No, it’s not. It’s exercising what little democracy we have left. The only vote for trump is an actual vote for trump.

The Democrat establishment simply doesn’t offer enough to anyone left of them. I don’t want the status quo; the status quo sucks. It’s a deregulated capitalist hellscape full of cruelty, slavery, wealth inequality, and planetary disaster.

I wish the dems could step back and realize what they are advocating for. The best and only choice for president is currently an 81-year-old man dealing with cognitive decline?! No, that’s not okay! That is not acceptable!

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I dont know how to explain this to you, but appealing to leftists would cost alot more moderates than the other way around

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes, you can manufacture consent. That was obvious. What will you do about it? The question being asked isn't, "how do we rebuild america." It is what do we do in novemeber. Any thing else is purposeful obsfucation.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Rebuild it... Like how it was in which year?

[-] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Why rebuild it like it was in the past?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I'm not the guy above but I like to answer that with "Giving everyone the rights and benefits white men enjoyed in the 1960's."

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

So then we're building something new, not restoring to a previous state.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Then let's get the hammers and nails out. New or old it doesn't matter.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Short term, pressure for replacing Biden. November, vote if you can stomach it. Thereafter, get involved with your state party. March. If you're in a red state then you have a unique position of running on more progressive things that are actually people oriented. That's what led to Democrats taking state wide offices in Arizona. You aren't beholden to the DNC's mega donors.

If you're in a blue state plan to help primary an establishment Democrat.

Don't shirk away because you can't do it yourself, that's an unrealistic expectation. Organize your friends, your coworkers, your commuter bus, etc.

Nothing in politics is "over" if you can get a critical mass of people to agree to change things. And it's really the only way off this manufactured consent treadmill for corporate power and profits we've been on for the last 40 years.

Edit to add- Confining the question to November is a logical fallacy. We aren't that close to the election that we can do nothing but vote. So that's pretty much just another attempt to get people to turn their brain off, vote, and then sit around waiting for the next thing their told to do. If we don't "activate" and start acting independently of big money then we aren't going to have a democracy come 2028, no matter which person is elected now. Biden is a vote for an Authoritarian Oligarchy. Which isn't "Fascism" in a technical sense, but it's not going to feel much different for you and me.

[-] bamboo 10 points 4 months ago

The risk of doing nothing becomes the greatest risk of all. It absolutely could be worse, we all lived through 4 years of Trump (and the aftermath re:Supreme Court appointments). We don't need hypotheticals here, there's a clear comparison between 4 years of Trump and 4 years of Biden, and not voting out of principal doesn't stop anything.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

In full transparency, I'm not voting for Biden in November because of the Palestinian Genocide and because I believe he's already ineffective at protecting LGBTQ rights in red states. But I'm not here to tell you not to vote for him in November. I should have been more clear above. We have the momentum to replace him and vote for someone that isn't just a figurehead. Biden and his allies are using the "vote blue no matter who" rhetoric as a club to stop people from talking about replacing him on the ticket. We can cross that bridge on August 23rd though, the day after the convention. Right now we need to fully and faithfully have the conversation about replacing him.

After November we need to better organize to prevent the mega donor class from steering us into a full Oligarchy. Something that's on the plate for both old guys.

[-] bamboo 5 points 4 months ago

I hate to break it to you but if it's Biden & Trump in November, regarding Palestinian Genocide and LGBTQ rights, Trump will absolutely be worse than Biden, so not voting for Biden will not change anything and just make things worse.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So this is an interesting issue. Either state's rights are so strong that Blue States can protect LGBTQ people as hard as Red States have been persecuting them or Biden is willfully letting Red States persecute LGBTQ people.

So no it's not going to be worse. It's going to be the same as it ever was in either case. And as for the Palestinians, my heart goes out to them but my vote isn't about what happens on the ground there. It's about the permissive morality of contributing to it. If we're willing to contribute to it there, then we're willing to contribute to it here. And you can see it shaping up in rhetoric against marginalized people by politicians from both parties. They disagree about LGBTQ people because that's a flashy issue they can use. The second you're talking about homeless people and immigrants the rhetoric converges.

We just approved forcing homeless people into camps, destroying all of their property, and using them as forced labor if they resist. Immigrants aren't far behind, we're on to trying to deny them asylum because they showed on the wrong day and return them to the hands of cartels in Northern Mexico. Something that's actually illegal according to our laws and international treaties we've signed. So now there's a displaced person problem on our border and in history that translates to forced labor. If you have questions about that you should read up on refugee camps where western volunteer doctors learn not to ask too many questions. The dynamic works whether or not it's officially declared a refugee camp.

[-] bamboo 3 points 4 months ago

I think all of these points really come down to the Supreme Court makeup, which got fucked under Trump. Trump was able to nominate 3 justices, which created the super majority we have now.

So no it’s not going to be worse. It’s going to be the same as it ever was in either case.

They have indicated that they want to undo previous decisions which codified gay rights. This isn't a red state/blue state issue, it will affect the whole country.

We just approved forcing homeless people into camps

The same court made the decision about making homelessness illegal. The most direct way to stop these horrible decisions from being made will be to support the impeachment of the corrupt justices, and ensure that we have a president who will nominate justices who aren't corrupt and taking away our rights.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Okay I need you to understand this. The Red States have been ignoring the old Supreme Court rulings. They do not care. and the Homeless laws I'm talking about were passed by Democrats, in contravention of old Supreme Court rulings.

This is not a SCOTUS issue. They're the scapegoat on these issues and the myth that there would be substantive change if we just kept Biden in office.

Either States are powerful enough to ignore the federal government, or they aren't. And the implications of that are not good for Biden either way. Because he's either powerless, in which case so would Trump be, or he's willfully allowing this, in which case the worst case scenario is already playing out.

[-] bamboo 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The Red States have been ignoring the old Supreme Court rulings.

Citation needed. Regardless if states follow the rulings, the supreme court can shift the views of the nation. After 2015 same sex marriage ruling, there was much higher support for same sex marriage, with noticable large increases with Republicans corresponding to the Supreme Court ruling:

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/06/26/support-for-same-sex-marriage-grows-even-among-groups-that-had-been-skeptical/

From the Article from 2017:

For the first time, a majority of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents do not oppose allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally.

To your other point:

myth that there would be substantive change if we just kept Biden in office.

When Biden assumed office, we were in the middle of a global pandemic, still social distancing because there were no vaccines, and we're having a 9/11 worth of American deaths every day. Maybe returning to normal life wasn't substantive for you, but there have been huge changes over the last 3.5 years of the Biden presidency.

Because he's either powerless, in which case so would Trump be, or he's willfully allowing this, in which case the worst case scenario is already playing out.

In this situation, do you think Trump would be willingly allowing atrocities or actively driving and enabling them? A Trump presidency would clearly be the worst case scenario here.

EDIT: just formatting

[-] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

nothing more than a figurehead.

That figurehead happens to be surrounded by people who aren't fascists and support policy that I mostly agree with, so I guess I'll take my chances with them.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Sure, if you agree with the policies of the Oligarchy then who am I to stop you?

You're already retired though right? Because if you aren't then I wouldn't plan on them allowing you to ever do so.

[-] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I guess if that's what you think is the oligarchy, than I suppose I do. And no, I am not retired, but I would say I am fairly successful with decent savings and retirement set aside.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
975 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5432 readers
2787 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS