1107
submitted 2 years ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] logos@sh.itjust.works 165 points 2 years ago

“You have a duty to demand the highest safety standards... and [ensure] that ‘speak up’ in fact means speak up, not shut up, as it is meant all too often.”

Tell that to Snowden, Assange, Manning etc.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Obligatory fuck Assange, no protection for Russian Agents.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

yawn. The 2016 media ops are really paying dividends.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Haha no. He selectively edited Manning's stuff to frame the US Army long before 2016.

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago

“Frame” the US Army..? Bro the great satan doesn’t need any framing, its sins are dripping from its fangs and claws.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Then why did he edit videos he used to accuse the Army of war crimes? If they don't need to be framed, why fuck with the evidence?

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Idgaf, death to America

[-] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Fuck Snowden too, no respect for him running to Russia. If you think it's your moral obligation to break the law, you should be willing to take the consequences. You can't run off to an enemy state that does much worse things than what you were willing to break the law to expose. I have zero doubt Snowden is a traitor and gave Russia whatever they wanted. It's possible he started off well meaning, but I wouldn't be shocked if he did it for Russia all along. His original intentions don't matter now either way, he had a high clearance and Russia now knows everything he learned with that clearance beyond even the scope of his "whistleblowing".

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 years ago

Maybe don't throw your whistleblowers in a jail and let them rot for life, and you will avoid defections to another country.

Can you blame the guy to not want to die in a dark cell for showing the world that your own government is keeping a lot of tabs on you without your knowledge?

He tried to go to other countries, but none of them wanted to take him in except Russia because of what he knew.

So it's either die in a cell in the US, or live a somewhat free man in Russia.

The choice is clear.

So demand that your government do better and get behind the people that shows you how your government fucks you over.

[-] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

There would have been a lot of pressure to get him released and would have kept what he revealed talked about and more pressure to end that as well. He's just a little bitch that wanted to play hero and or a Russian agent.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

Spoken like a true keyboard warrior.

[-] xyz1195@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Guys I found the gatorade abuser.

[-] habitualcynic@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 years ago

I thought he was trying to go somewhere with no extradition treaty with the US and was laid over in Russia when his passport was suspended. It’s kind of outlined here but I could see how that could be concocted and I just want to believe he was better than a Russia mole.

[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He didnt run to russia you moron, his passport was canceled by the USA while he was in russia. And his only demand for giving himself up to the US and go to trial was that he was allowed a public interest defense.

FUCK THE USA. You are licking the boots of a surveillance state, and snowden has more backbone than your entire familytree

[-] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

Fuck the US and any other governments that are doing this dodgy shit that requires whistleblowing in the first place.

[-] VeganCheesecake 32 points 2 years ago

I mean, if I felt morally obliged to disclose illegal or immoral practices to the public, I'd be sure to run so somewhere they can't get me. If there aren't proper whistleblower protections, you gotta make your own.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago

I have noticed that if you say anything bad about snowden on reddit or now the Fediverse, you quickly get down-voted a lot. I am starting to think this is coordinated somehow.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

He’s a whistleblower. Corrupt corpos/countries hate whistleblowers. Reddit/Lemmy users hate corrupt corpos/countries. There.

It’s as easy as that, no need to bring out conspiracies.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

You are probably right. It’s just the speed and amount that got me thinking otherwise. Lemmy is a lot more popular then I thought.

[-] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

No, it's just about the dumbest thing I've read today. So far.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

Deploy our great bot army!

For what purpose, Sir?

Downvote any post on any social media platform that is critical of Snowden!

As you command, SIr!

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

It's not coordination when sheep decide to bleat the same thing based off headlines. Most people want to believe he wasn't a mole because that fits the little guy hero narrative better.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Most people want to believe he wasn’t a mole

This sheep has never seen anyone provide any kind of evidence for such claims.

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

He could not have gained access from his position to the data compiled. His story on how he did doesn't add up to anyone with security clearance. The real way it was accomplished isn't going to be divulged either. The NSA isn't going to publicly explain whatever avenue was found.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

You see that this is trust me bro, no matter how correct you may be, right?

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

That's how security clearance works bro

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That’s how security clearance works bro

I get that, but it doesn't change this statement.

This sheep has never seen anyone provide any kind of evidence for such claims.

Trust me bro isn't evidence. It doesn't mean you are wrong, it means you are a random person claiming to have inside knowledge but providing nothing but your word.

That's how evidence works bro.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
1107 points (100.0% liked)

News

38864 readers
1677 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS