857
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago

Because it wasn't done for or with the approval of locals

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

But it was done, which is kind of the opposite of NIMBY. Also it's not a project that could go anywhere, except that no one wants it.

Closing Guantanamo was a NIMBY thing because, while everyone agrees it should happen, no one wanted the detainees in their backyard. (As ridiculous as that is.)

[-] Rayspekt@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The Panama canal was a US NIMBY project I'd argue. Give us the canal but without impacting our territory.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Your comment is actually insane.

There is no way the US would not have preferred the canal to be in their backyard.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We didn't maintain administration of the canal for just over a century for no reason. We would have put that shit in the Rio Grande, if we could have. Unfortunately that river runs dry for several months a year.

Especially since that particular area of the world is some of the least developed.

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
857 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6021 readers
3259 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS