293
submitted 5 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

210 Palestinians killed according to the news reports.

Edit: 274 Palestinians killed.

How an Israeli raid freed 4 hostages and killed at least 274 Palestinians in Gaza

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Only in this particular operation. But the war had to get this far for them to conduct it. So the cost is exponentially higher.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

The big question on all of our minds -- was this worth it?

No. It probably wasn't.

[-] Monomate@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

If you were one of the parents/relatives of the kidnapped israelis, would you still think it was not worth it?

[-] oyo@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

Tens of thousands of innocents dead? Uh.. No. I would think there were far more effective methods that should have been used.

[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago

If you were a parent of one of the torn apart kids, would think it was worth it?

Yeah. Dumb point.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 5 months ago

If a cease-fire with a prisoner exchange was literally on the table but rejected by Israel, I'd pick the option where a bunch of innocent blood isn't spilled to secure a release.

[-] Monomate@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

So, the ideal solution for you is a return to the status quo, but with the Hamas getting away with it. Plus a bonus: multiple prisoners released just for returning the hostages to their homes, from where they should never have been kidnapped from in the first place. And, the cherry in top, the Hamas still having the capability of launching missiles whenever it pleases. What a great deal! (for the Hamas only, of course)

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 5 months ago

Sounds better than whatever the fuck is happening now, yeah.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

No, but I'm fully aware I'm a hypocrite there. I think most people are when it comes to their loved ones. If I was family of the hostages, I wouldn't care how many innocent people died to get them back. I'd support the IDF.

If I was the family of the nearby Palestinians, I wouldn't care about the hostages, and I'd let them die if it meant my family would be safe. I'd support Hamas.

This is why geopolitics can't be personal. The best decision is not one that you insert yourself into, because you have a much higher threshold for acceptable collateral if it's your own family on the line.

At the same time though, this is also a lesson in why a ceasefire is crucial. You put yourself into everyone's shoes, and you understand why this needs to end. Everyone's families and loved ones are dying or in captivity, and it's perpetuating a cycle of violence. It needs to end. Israel has the power to withdraw from Gaza and pursue purely diplomatic means, and it should.

[-] Monomate@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In the end of the day, it's the law of the strongest. It's no accident that Israel hoard a lot of weapons of war and build defensive systems like the Iron Dome. It's a show of power for a very simple goal: deterrence. I don't think Israel really though of using all their weapons, but just having them makes every one the enemy nations that surround them to think twice before attacking them. Well, Hamas did not think twice. And they cannot say they didn't saw it coming.

Israel accepting a ceasefire deal would be nice for saving lives and all, but would leave them vulnerable for future missile attacks from Hamas. A nation will always think of its own citizens first. Maybe the Hamas already counted with this reaction of Israel, and though that other Arab countries would form a coalition to fight Israel simultaneously. Well, it didn't pan out. Deterrence worked after all.

this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
293 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2220 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS