347
submitted 5 months ago by vividspecter@lemm.ee to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

There should be zero delivery trucks clogging city streets. Zero.

Good luck with that. And the bike-riding population will do all their shopping far outside the city, where shops still survive? A cargo bike is nice for personal shopping, for deliviering letters or small packets, but you won't be able to fill the shelves of a supermarket this way. And whoever thinks about using freight trams for this, sit down and actually think this idea through for a change.

[-] Nemo@midwest.social 72 points 5 months ago

Delivery trucks are fine. They don't contribute to sprawl, are driven by professional drivers, and don't need parking lots.

It's personal automobiles that are the problem.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 months ago

Sure, if you focus on the "zero" part of the phrase you can score a cheap point. Now focus on the "trucks" and the "clogging" part. A van can stock up a small to medium store just fine, and a walkable neighborhood doesn't need big box stores to begin with (and small business ownership is a plus for economic conservatives too). And with fewer cars carting individuals around, delivery vans can move in and out much more efficiently without clogging up anything.

[-] RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago

If I had a dime for every time somebody made this reply, I’d have a lot of dimes.

Nobody has ever said that. What people are saying is that the private automobile is the worst way to move masses of people in cities. They command ungodly amounts of space, make everything more expensive thereby, and aren’t even good at moving masses of people.

You want to increase the capacity of your road? You can:

  • spend millions adding lanes and possibly destroying houses
  • turn a lane into a dedicated bus lane
  • turn a lane into a bike lane
  • hell, pedestrian areas have higher people capacities than car lanes
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Yes, you are right. You are talking of moving people inside cities. I am talking about a) getting in and out of the city and b) moving goods into and out of cities. None of the usual demands in this group ever even starts to address this.

[-] ebc@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

What usually works better for moving people in and out of cities is park-n-ride setups where you setup a giant parking lot in the suburbs next to a metro station. People can just ditch their car outside the city and proceed using public transit. I often do this in Montreal, for example.

For goods, it's a similar setup but with big trucks transferring cargo to smaller trucks; this is already pretty common.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

In theory, P&R is fine.

But my experience with P&R is that they are generally so far out of the city and the bus/tram/tube/whatever connection is a normal "outside the city" link which goes every 30-60 minutes if one is lucky (during the weekdayday, evenings and weekends are way worse), and then stops at every lantern on the way to the city center. And still costs a fortune.

Additionally, the tram stop at our next P&R is not exactly handicapped-friendly. So I have to get my wife somehow into the tram, which involves a number of high steps at the trams' doors.

[-] biddy@feddit.nl 4 points 5 months ago

Yes, of course delivery trucks need access to cities, some goods are not practical to move by cargo bike. As do emergency services and buses. Nobody disagrees with this. The problem in many cities is that streets are clogged with useless private cars. So the obvious solution is to ban private cars.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Just because you have no need for a car, private cars are not necessarily useless.

[-] biddy@feddit.nl 4 points 5 months ago

Private cars in general are not useless, but private cars in the center of cities should be useless if the city is designed well. The space-transportation trade off does not make sense.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

...if the city is designed well. You got the problem of the next city right on.

But even if I was living in a well-designed city, I would still use a private car, as moving handicapped people (like my wife) around on public transport is quite a nightmare. Yes, we have tried.

[-] Ithral 9 points 5 months ago

So, why do we need a supermarket? Is there any reason a supermarket couldn't be replaced with it's contingent parts? A butcher, a veggie shop, a convenience food shop, a pharmacy, a bakery, and a condiments shop?

I don't see why they have to be stapled together when separate works just fine. All of which could fairly practically be stocked individually by small light duty trucks, or even a bike with a decently sized trailer.

I also don't see why even if you staple everything together, a cargo tram wouldn't work. Have two, a passenger tram that works one route, and a cargo line that runs by the loading bays of local stores. They can be switched on and off the overarching infrastructure without interfering with each other.

It would be a paradigm shift for the US, but I fail to see how it would be an unworkable one.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 10 points 5 months ago

How do you think any of those are getting goods? If you ban trucks you'll just get cargo vans and then lots of smaller cars. Or they'll go out of business and people will complain you can't live in the city and move to suburbia. Again.

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 4 points 5 months ago

Ooh, how was that called again, proxy-arguments? They were answered 10 years ago already.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

And, all in all, they will need the same amount of goods to supply the same amount of people. And they will be substantially more expensive in comparison to a big box supermarket.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Many smaller businesses could be served just fine with cargo bikes. And once every inch of free space is no longer clogged up by parking cars, it'll be easy to assign loading zones for bigger vehicles that supply supermarkets and the like. Now make those electric and everything becomes much quieter and less polluted. Then people will actually enjoy coming to the city centre again so business there can thrive.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah I can only think of people envisioning small downtown stores only using small trucks/vans or the weird one underground cargo tracks (there is a startup in Texas pushing for that one).

Even then trucking tends to just make more sense from everything I've experienced, but what do I know

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Underground cargo tracks is a nice idea, but hardly realistic. Can you imagine ripping open the whole city to build that, and the cost of such an undertaking?

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

If I remember right they were planning smaller deployments (think building scale, neighborhood scale) with boring tech being the solution to installation.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

This can only provide a local solution. To make this work on a larger scale, you need the city to be built for this. So basically, this is a very long term thing.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

I think last mile is probably the most problematic part of delivery anyways since it effects how the places we live are actually built the most.

Trains, ships, planes, and semis are all the solutions for the backhaul at the moment

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 5 months ago

It's not exactly some unsolvable logic puzzle. This is a problem not everywhere has, it's pretty simple.

Two solutions.

First, you create a second way in. It can be anything from dedicated streets for cargo with all the loading docks to shared warehouses at the edge of the city and underground tunnels like Disney. The main idea is to dedicate most streets to people and bikes, which can have all the storefronts

Or the easy way we could do far more quickly... Instead of slicing space you slice time. Limit deliveries from 4am to 7am, maybe an afternoon slot if necessary. The idea being people get the prime time, and you work out the logistics with that constraint

For better logistics, limit the size of the trucks and do shared distribution centers as a buffer for normal shipping times.

Ideally, you do #2 while transitioning to #1. Put a slowly increasing off hour delivery tax and create an incentive. The logistics will magically come together as the tax grows

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Limit deliveries from 4am to 7am

Oh boy I sure do love being woken up at 5am because the loud-ass delivery truck is restocking the grocery store.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 5 months ago

I don't know what it's like where you live, but I do sometimes get woken up by the garbage truck. Not often, but it's loud as shit and comes just before 5am... IDK if it's bad luck, but everywhere I've ever lived seems to have garbage trucks that came well before sunrise, and they're about the loudest trucks before you get up to construction vehicles

Unloading a truck isn't even on the same volume scale. Especially if we used small trucks from a distribution center outside the city. Other countries do it, and we do it already, just not in the same numbers I'm proposing

This doesn't sound like an actual issue to me

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Adding more noise early in the morning doesn't feel like a good idea to me

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
347 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9668 readers
24 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS