1187
Reminder... (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 9 months ago

No, it means I'm not ok with genocide but you are.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago

You have two options:

  • Ok with genocide. Otherwise relatively progressive. Has passed major important legislation.
  • Ok with genocide. Wants to be a dictator. Appointed half of the Supreme Court majority that took away women’s right to abortion. Will probably strip more rights if elected. Cut taxes on the wealthy and will probably do it again.

You can throw away your vote, but come inauguration, you will have a president who is ok with genocide.

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 months ago

But I will not have voted for one of them. But you will have and the blood will be on your hands.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

You have an abysmally stupid sense of morality.

[-] gbuttersnaps@programming.dev 21 points 9 months ago

I think some of these people have to be trolls. We're basically in the trolley problem where the trolley is headed for 100,000 people, and if you pull the lever it will only kill 1. You can't abstain from pulling the lever and act like you're completely innocent of the deaths of the masses.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That’s an awful lot of trolls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zengen@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

If you truly oppose genocide. You should be plotting a coup against the US executive branch.

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

We don’t know they aren’t.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

How is being against a genocide immoral?

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

If your morality prioritizes staunch adherence to standards over harm reduction, you have a stupid sense of morality.

It’s the kind of morality where someone would rather let a child die than push them out of the way of a speeding car, simply because pushing them would harm them.

Your morality should lead you to making decisions that result in the least harm. Look at it this way: if all of the people who voted third party instead of Hillary because Hillary wasn’t [insert moral standard here] enough had sucked it up and voted for Hillary, access to abortion would still be legal nationwide. (This assumes enough people to get her elected voted third party over moral objections.)

Trump is the worst president in my life time, by a huge margin, and he’s even more in favor of genocide than Biden, demonstrably. So if your sense of morality causes you to help put him in charge of our country again, in my mind, you’re a fucking moron.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I’m not talking about drug harm reduction. I’m talking about the reduction of harm. Put another way, aiming to reduce the amount of harm your actions lead to.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Rebellion? I don't like hearing such a word from you," Ivan said with feeling. "One cannot live by rebellion, and I want to live. Tell me straight out, I call on you--answer me: imagine that you yourself are building the edifice of human destiny with the object of making people happy in the finale, of giving them peace and rest at last, but for that you must inevitably and unavoidably torture just one tiny creature, that same child who was beating her chest with her little fist, and raise your edifice on the foundation of her unrequited tears--would you agree to be the architect on such conditions? Tell me the truth."
"No, I would not agree," Alyosha said softly.
"And can you admit the idea that the people for whom you are building would agree to accept their happiness on the unjustified blood of a tortured child, and having accepted it, to remain forever happy?"
"No, I cannot admit it.

Fyodor Dostoyevsky — The Brothers Karamazov

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Ok cool. Your choice is between genocide, and genocide but worse. You can proclaim how righteous and moral you are that all the pain everyone around you is feeling is not your fault, because you merely threw your vote away, but that won’t change the outcome, and it won’t make you anything but a moron.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It’s my fault Biden won’t declare his intentions to stop the genocide. I’m to blame everybody. My vote has doomed us all. The horror.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

“And can you admit the idea that the people for whom you are building would agree to accept their happiness on the unjustified blood of a tortured child, and having accepted it, to remain forever happy?”

"No, I cannot admit it."

Dostoevsky never met American liberals lol.

[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I've asked folks who aren't voting for Biden what they think the odds of their vote reducing genocide in the real world is, and all I've gotten is crickets.

Given that there doesn't seem to be much confidence there, the real world results are likely trump or biden.

Trump has folks in his party alluding to nukes when saying Palestine has to be ended quickly, even trump himself has stated that Israel has to end the war quickly. Therefore I suggest that Trump will result in far more lives lost than Biden.

Folks on Lemmy are typically left-leaning.

This means that a Lemmy user voting third party could've been a vote for Biden, which in a binary choice results in less lives lost. Yes, I know, Biden centrist, etc etc, but he's to the left of the absolute insanity that is the republican party.

However instead some folks value a clean conscience over real world results, and vote third party/abstain. If these votes would've otherwise gone to Biden, then they have made a trump presidency more likely, which has the real world effect of resulting in more lives lost.

I'm fine with people voting with their conscience, but I just want folks to acknowledge whether or not their vote makes a trump presidency (therefore more genocide) more likely. Most people just seem to think "I'm not voting for genocide so my hands are clean and I'm good!" and stick their head in the sand.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

a Lemmy user voting third party could’ve been a vote for Biden,

if he wanted to earn it

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

So, you’re okay with not having a clean conscience? Or, other voters should be okay with not having a clear conscience? If Biden winning is more important to you than having a clean conscience. Vote for him. But don’t pressure people that choose to have a clear conscience.

Unless thought police is on your bucket list.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

From my perspective, they are implying that your belief that voting third party or abstaining gives you a clear conscience makes you a self-centered, arrogant fool. Because the result of your action (or inaction) will increase the likelihood of the more bad thing happening.

To me, that's not a clear conscience. That's ignorance. That's explicitly choosing to ignore the consequences of your (in)action. That's short-sightedness to the degree that someone would expect of a preschooler. One with behavioral problems.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

But then if Trump wins because you didn’t vote for either, then you’re ok with Genocide+ rather than Genocide light. Meaning you have to vote for the lesser of the two evils if no matter what you do the majority are voting for the only two who are likely to win.

You’re either incredibly stupid, a troll, or are being obstinate on purpose.

[-] krzschlss@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Genocide light? Seriously?!? If the other guy is stupid, you are stupid+

There is no democracy if you are supporting genocide. There is no election worth voting on if the outcome is same fucking fascist, just with different colored flags. And don’t give me the lie how you’re gonna do something about a ‘genocide light’ if your guy is elected. Fuck off

This whole country needs to stop sucking Kissinger’s dick and change this bloodthirsty, greedy fascist system.

[-] bolexforsoup 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] krzschlss@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Ask the people in Gaza what they think about "Roe got overturned".

After all said and nothing done, we are paying for those bullets that murder their children by accepting and even promoting a system that gives us braindead mouthpieces for weapon manufacturers to vote for.

[-] bolexforsoup 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Vote for whomever you want, or not vote. Make your own decision, stop letting others make the decision for you.

[-] bolexforsoup 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why do you think I’m upset that you are voting for Biden? You should vote for whomever you want. I’m voting for genocide Joe and I understand the implications of that. What I won’t do is plead with others to do the same. It is their choice, not mine. I understand why someone would vote for Biden. But , I also understand others have different priorities and material interests. Forcing, or shaming others to vote your choice is not democratic… it’s authoritarian. And isn’t that what we wish to prevent?

[-] bolexforsoup 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I’m an American, I’ve been drowning in piss my whole life. You want me to hate you for voting for Biden, even though he is helping a genocide. I won’t, because I understand you have your reasons. Or you want me to hate others because they won’t vote for Biden, because he’s helping a genocide. I’m not gonna do that either, because I support their cause.

Your anger is better directed at the institutions that allowed us to arrive at this juncture.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] krzschlss@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

November is quite cold where I’m at, we like to go hiking or skiing. Or staying in and watching movies. A nice dinner with friends? I hope I gave you at least one good idea what to do in November.

But you can go out and vote for a sociopath and genocide denier or for a racist rapist and when those clowns start killing and bombing some other people somewhere on the globe, you can just blame the Chinese or Icelanders for making you vote for a lesser evil…

Life’s good either way…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Small problem. A person who is against genocide would not be okay with a genocide under Trump either, so why should they be okay with a genocide under Biden?

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 11 points 9 months ago

So.... What do you think are the odds that your third party vote improves the situation in Palestine?

If your third party vote makes it more likely that Trump wins and results in more bloodshed, that is a choice you contributed to, and blood is still on your hands.

[-] bolexforsoup 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 4 points 9 months ago

virtue-signalling : the act or practice of conspicuously displaying one's awareness of and attentiveness to political issues, matters of social and racial justice, etc., especially instead of taking effective action

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The argument for voting against left-wing or socialist candidates on the grounds that they can’t win and are therefore helping the right wing into power has, of course, been a time-worn argument in the United States against bucking the two-party system. Engels, in an 1893 letter to an American colleague, pointed out that in the United States, the formation of a workers’ party is hindered by the "Constitution…which makes it appear as though every vote were lost that is cast for a candidate not put up by one of the two governing parties." isreview

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

If you don't vote against fascism, you allowed fascism.

[-] turtletracks@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 months ago

Not voting is a vote for Trump.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That’s not logical. So, if my choices are pizza or nuggies, and I choose neither. Then I chose nuggies? Make it make sense.

I may be intermittent fasting to lose weight, or rejecting imperialist capitalism.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Cool, I'll give you a pass on the genocide, but you will still be as responsible as anyone who voted for Trump for all the other terrible things he said he will do that you are doing nothing to prevent.

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 months ago

If you're not ok with genocide you should vote against Donald "just nuke them" Trump.

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

I am going to. Who said I'm not?

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 14 points 9 months ago

Voting for anyone but Biden is the same as voting for Trump.

this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
1187 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4971 readers
138 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS