672
submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 149 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

ITT- You're allowed your first amendment right to protest war crimes, just not where I can see or be inconvenienced. Because all of the civil rights and anti war protests in the past 70 years that were truly successful were very polite and inconvenienced no one.

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 134 points 7 months ago

MLK Jr. literally wrote about this exact same thing in his Letter from Birmingham jail.

that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Councilor or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: ‘I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action’; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a ‘more convenient season.’ ”

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago

Yeah I remember reading that in college. He wasn't the bland platitudes guy high schools teach.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

He was also assassinated right after he started pivoting from civil rights to economic inequality (starting the Poor People's Campaign). Funny coincidence, that.

[-] Zess@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

Stopping traffic on the Golden Gate bridge to protest a genocide on the other side of the planet is so far from direct action.

[-] TheCoralReefsAreDying69@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago

When the state responsible for the genocide is reliant on our military aid its disingenuous to refer to it as a "genocide on the other side of the planet"

[-] Zess@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

It's realistic. And these protesters could be realistic and maybe even effective if they tried to disrupt production of that aid we're sending to Israel. But I'm pretty sure F-15s aren't made on a bridge.

[-] diffusive@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

There is difference between peaceful protest and sabotage. Exactly like there is a difference between discussing with someone and punch them in the face.

If you think people should not discuss because it’s pointless and should directly switch to punch in the face I suspect you are not necessarily the internet stranger I want to listen to

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TwoCubed@feddit.de 11 points 7 months ago

Yet here I am, in Germany, seeing that many US citizens apparently care about the situation. This I might not have known without this article.

It's about exposure. That's why climate activists glue themselves to the streets here in Germany. Does it make sense? Not really. Do people know the cause they're fighting for? Absolutely. That's a good thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago

it's just not a good time guys, maybe next year when things are better!

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago

I mean, the people they're irritating aren't the ones that can do anything about it. All you're doing is pissing everyone off. Go to your state's capitol and fuck that place up instead.

[-] Jamil@lemm.ee 39 points 7 months ago

Pissing people off is irrelevant. You're irrelevant. You will not be swayed. You have demonstrated that after 6 months of innocent deaths. Even if 100,000 children die. 1 million children die. You're selfish and lazy.

This is direct action, it's about adding a financial cost to the government's direction. They've decided supporting a genocide is more financially beneficial than pursuing justice. If we shut it all down, they'll change their tune.

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 36 points 7 months ago

I mean, it sucks to get inconvenienced by stuff like this. But the goal is to make nations hurt economically for supporting the Palestinian genocide.

Most of the other options available would probably injure or kill innocent people. Like, you're not gonna make a difference without some casualties. Better that casualty be an afternoon instead of your life.

[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Do you support the Islamic Palestinian Jihad terrorists calling for genocide of the jews?

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

No. I assume you're talking about Hamas.

I don't support them, but they exist because Israel turned Gaza into a nursery for terrorist cells. I suspect they did it on purpose. They don't give a shit how many civilians die as a result; they need terrorists cells so they can justify their genocide to the rest of the world.

As far as I'm concerned every drop of blood Hamas spills is on Netanyahu's hands.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Interrupting labor is the most peaceful way to threaten the capitalist class. If you object to this, you advocate for more extreme measures. Be careful what you wish for.

[-] 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

This argument completely ignores the impact this has on regular people. People who end up late to pick up their kids from daycare and end up owing extra money when they can barely make ends meet as it is. Yeah, this may have some marginal impact on the capitalist class, but it will be far more painful for the employees who WILL be held accountable for being late to work and may easily end up fired, and certainly will not be paid for the time they miss. Let alone the life safety issues this type of demonstration creates. This is holding your peers ransom because of something you want and you take away their autonomy to decide whether or not to take part. If you can't convince people to join your cause willingly, maybe your cause isn't as good as you think it is.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

Yes the capitalist class has been waging war on the working class for decades through wage suppression. What do you propose be done to turn things around?

[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Islamic terrorists could stop.. you know, terrorizing, and hand over the hostages. It's a starting point.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 15 points 7 months ago

You seem like a person that reallllllly critically examines what they are told!

[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Yes, that is why my opinions are that of my own.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

5 months and still this talking point. Kudos for tenacity.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If you want the inconvenient protests to stop, fucking join them so that the change happens quicker.

[-] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Right... because antagonizing and harming people is such a great way to convince them to help you.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

At a certain critical mass a protest which interrupts labor needs no more recruits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 22 points 7 months ago

Nah, it's random people who are at fault. How dare they have jobs or other things to do

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Those people aren't at fault in any meaningful sense no. But collectively their labor keeps everything running. To interrupt labor is to interrupt the means with which the capitalist class commit their atrocities.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Do you want wide support for laws allowing cops to clear these protests out of the street? Because I'm quite sure that's what it'll do.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Yes I expect the capitalist class to continually escalate violence against the working class rather than make meaningful compromises for the betterment of all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

Sure we can do something about it. We can vote against anyone who supports the genocide.

The state level goverment doesn't have as much impact on foreign policy as federal does.

Legislatures are persuaded by polls and bribes, not by reason or empathy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zess@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Did they have a permit to protest on a public road? Freedom of assembly comes with some perfectly rational stipulations.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

I'm sorry I didn't see the word permit in the first amendment. I'm getting old enough to need glasses. Maybe I should try with them?

...

Nope, still no such requirement.

[-] Zess@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Didn't see anything about age requirements in the second but it's illegal to sell a gun to a kid. Crazy how things work.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Historically kids have never been afforded Constitutional rights. Which is kind of crazy. Almost as crazy as making the idea of kids owning guns equivalent to the bedrock right of a Democracy.

[-] Zess@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Just trying to show that there's more to the rights in the Bill of Rights than just the text of the Bill of Rights.

[-] eskimofry@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

To make it illegal to fight for lives vs. Fighting for right to own a gun are not the same. I guess nuance is not your forte?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] archomrade@midwest.social 19 points 7 months ago
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Freedoms and rights do need to have rules and regulations. Otherwise you would have nonstop hate speech and death threats protected by freedom of speech or protesting at hospitals and blocking ambulances like during COVID.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 10 points 7 months ago

One may well ask, “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: There are just laws and there are unjust laws. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.

~MLK, Letter from Birmingham

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

So uh... Have you seen a planned parenthood clinic in the last 20 years? They have escorts for a reason.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

So would you agree there should be rules about protestors blocking access to planned parenthood? Or is it perfectly fine the way the system is right now, just allowing them to threaten and harass everyone going inside for unhindered rights or assembly?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Oh so now the road protestors are threatening and harassing the people in the cars instead of just telling signs at them and holding signs?

Lmao.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I sometimes wonder how people feel about the long game here.. Iran and its proxies obviously want to continue to attack Israel. Do these protestors expect Israel to just allow thousands more rockets to try and land in civilian territory? Do any of these people actually believe that is a realistic view of the world?

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago

~~Iran~~ Israel and its proxies obviously want to continue to attack ~~Israel~~ Iran and Palestine.

FTFY

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Maybe I'm just fedposting, but I think probably my only objection to this protest is that it wasn't extreme enough, and I don't think it accomplished as much as it probably could've considering all the people protesting got arrested anyways. Probably a good amount of caltrops on the bridge and a bunch of cards or spray paint could've accomplished about the same goal, and I dunno if anyone would've even been arrested that way. Probably would take less in resources, too.

That's if you even looking at the same target, I dunno if shutting down the golden gate bridge is a great thing to hit up if you're looking to protest gaza. I would probably think one of many even local politician's domiciles, city halls, or lockheed martin manufacturing plants, offices, infrastructure, etc. would be better things to hit. I dunno of the economic or social impact or protesting at the golden gate bridge for what is basically an afternoon is going to put anyone under duress. Maybe the most you could say of it is that it's a mild social escalation, which, granted, isn't nothing, but is less direct and is harder to quantify the impact of.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

They arrest them to clear the bridge. They tried to charge the ones in 2023 with ridiculous stuff but they eventually dropped all the charges in exchange for 5 hours community service. Don't give them the ammo they need to actually lock up protestors.

[-] FarmTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I know lets destroy random peoples cars?? wth

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
672 points (100.0% liked)

News

23387 readers
1885 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS