850
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Vice President Kamala Harris on Friday called on the federal government to move “as quickly as possible” to change the way it officially classifies marijuana, saying that “nobody should have to go to jail for smoking weed.”

“I cannot emphasize enough that they need to get to it as quickly as possible,” Harris said. “We need to have a resolution based on their findings and their assessment. This issue is stark when one considers the fact that on the schedule currently, marijuana is considered as dangerous as heroin ― as dangerous as heroin ― and more dangerous than fentanyl, which is absurd, not to mention patently unfair.”

Marijuana is currently listed as a Schedule 1 drug by the Drug Enforcement Administration. That classification designates it one of the most dangerous drugs possible, with no medicinal uses. Other substances in the same category include heroin, ecstasy and LSD. Marijuana advocates have been pushing for years for the federal government to either reschedule marijuana to a different category or deschedule it entirely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 29 points 8 months ago

If democrats can't get this done ahead of the election it will be criminally negligent

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 25 points 8 months ago

They've had 4 years, it's already negligent

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago

Donald Trump came into office and had both Houses.

Never even mentioned weed, unless it was to talk about how users should be executed.

But I'm sure he'll change next time

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 8 points 8 months ago

Hahaha right. "But I swear guys he'll do the right thing this time!!!1!". Dictator day 1

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 8 months ago

Who said anything about Trump?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

Talking about US politics and not mentioning the GOP is impossible.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

At least it is if you can't defend Democrats' deliberate uselessness.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

What makes you think there's a giant majority of the country begging for a hard Left party?

Every poll I've seen puts 'Socialists' at about 6% of the population.

Do you have better data?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

What makes you think there’s a giant majority of the country begging for a hard Left party?

Well, about this particular issue, 70% of the US wants what neither conservative party is willing to ever do.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

The title of the article is that the current, Democratic Vice President is calling for it to be rescheduled.

Biden pardoned all pot smokers back in 2022.

You tried to move the goal posts and failed.

And apparently you agree that less than 10% of the population is 'Socialist.'

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The title of the article is that the current, Democratic Vice President is calling for it to be rescheduled.

Fruitless words are not accomplishments. If we accept the former in lieu of the latter, we will not get the latter. I'm sure that's fine with you.

Biden pardoned all pot smokers back in 2022.

No, he pardoned the tiny fraction of pot smokers who are convicted in federal court. I'm not faulting him for not pardoning the others, as he cannot pardon state convictions.

And apparently you agree that less than 10% of the population is ‘Socialist.’

I don't care what your made up statistics are, you were trying to divert from the subject at hand.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

As I see it, the 'subject at hand' is that it's hard to get all fifty states to agree on something like this.

A lot of voters adamantly oppose any changes, and they have a right to be heard too, even if you don't like it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

A lot of voters adamantly oppose any changes, and they have a right to be heard too, even if you don’t like it.

I mean, it's still illegal, so they are heard. I have every right to be upset, even if you love the current status quo.

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Poll on the issues and policies instead of the labels and you'll get wildly different results

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I agree 100% That's one of my biggest beefs with my fellow Progressives. I once got into it with someone. I said the only thing we should be saying is "Tax the rich." He spent hours explaining why we had to educate the workers into Marxism before we could do anything meaningful.

It's too bad we don't vote on issues and polices; we vote on politicians and the Right knows how to find pretty faces who know how to sound good.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 8 months ago

It sure seems like it was possible, at least until you showed up.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Who was it who said that Twitter was great because they could tell you all they knew about any subject in 140 characters?

[-] thirteene@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Or they felt confident that they would get a free win, and delayed it until the election news cycle. It's likely a bit of both.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 8 months ago
[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Does it require Congress, including Republicans, to do it?

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Not in all cases. There are different types of legalization.

Rescheduling is probably the better way forward because it would allow for medical use within the healthcare system.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No, the relevant agencies (I think FDA?) control how drugs are scheduled, so essentially it's just a case of that agency making the change. I don't even think the President needs to be involved in that.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

If it comes down to pretending it does versus letting up on the racist drug war, Democrats will need congress.

It's not like it's something they want to do, like supporting the genocide every last centrist has always wanted. Don't need congress for that.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
850 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3152 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS