656
submitted 9 months ago by Maven@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 66 points 9 months ago

Let’s make up a scenario in our head that never existed and get pissed off about it.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The party could ultimately decide to seat New Hampshire's delegates at the convention this summer, but as of now, none will be awarded in Tuesday's Democratic primary.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-many-delegates-new-hampshire-primary-2024/

Welp, looks like you're wrong...

Edit:

I'll add the full context even

Last year, the Democratic Party moved to shake up its primary calendar and allow South Carolina to hold the first primary. New Hampshire Democrats said moving the date of their primary would require a new state law and couldn't be done in time.

The Democratic National Committee said the state violated the party's rules by holding its contest earlier than allowed, and thus none of the state's delegates would be up for grabs in the election. Mr. Biden also protested the primary date and withheld his name from the ballot, so anyone who wants to vote for the commander in chief will have to do so with a write-in vote.

Democratic candidates like Rep. Dean Phillips and self-help author Marianne Williamson will be on the ballot Tuesday, but Mr. Biden is still expected to win. The party could ultimately decide to seat New Hampshire's delegates at the convention this summer, but as of now, none will be awarded in Tuesday's Democratic primary.

In 2020, New Hampshire Democrats allotted 24 pledged delegates.

24 delegates, thrown out because the state party (who is in charge of primaries) didn't do what the national party asked, because that would require changing state law and there just wasn't time for that.

So the DNC and Biden threw a tantrum and tossed democracy out the window.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Are you aware that New Hampshire decided to unilaterally put themselves first in the primary schedule based on some nonsense in their state constitution?

"The presidential primary election shall be held on the second Tuesday in March or on a date selected by the secretary of state which is 7 days or more immediately preceding the date on which any other state shall hold a similar election, whichever is earlier, of each year when a president of the United States is to be elected or the year previous," the law says.

But last year, the Democratic Party, supported by President Biden, announced it would be changing its primary calendar to prioritize South Carolina and move up battleground states such as Michigan and Georgia. New Hampshire's state government, controlled by Republicans, refused to comply with the DNC's new rules and scheduled the primary for Jan. 23, leaving it first.

As a result, Mr. Biden is not appearing on the ballot, although his campaign has launched an aggressive write-in campaign. Democratic candidates participating in the unofficial primary on Tuesday will not win any delegates, so any victory will be symbolic.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-new-hampshire-primary-first-in-the-nation/

As I'm somewhat a fan of democracy, I think that South Carolina is a much better first primary state than New Hampshire for the simple reason that it better represents the demographic and ideological makeup of that party.

I agree with the commenter above, you've inventing shit to be mad at.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

They stripped the state of their primary delegates...

Because the state party wouldn't violate state law...

I get why you added the "somewhat" to that end but tho.

And I don't think any exchange with somone so anti-demacratic will ever be productive in a political sub.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yep, ya got me bro. Nothing says "i love democracy", or as you call it "demacracy", like advocating for a small state which is not at all representative of the broader voting base to unilaterally put itself first in line to the nomination process. 😂

With people like you around it's no wonder Socrates was put to death by popular vote. They also loved making shit up to get mad at back then.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I was with you until you added the ad hominem attack.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Fair. Totally fair.

That was wrong of me, I was just tired of constant bad-faith arguments over nothing.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The bad faith arguments are infuriating

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The party could ultimately decide to seat New Hampshire's delegates at the convention this summer, but as of now, none will be awarded in Tuesday's Democratic primary.

Yeah, sounds like you're getting mad at hypotheticals. Maybe hold off on the pitchforks.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The pulled the delegates...

Biden won...

If they reinstate the delegates, that's not better, that's worse. Because the last two primaries the party favorite comes in last and the most progressive has won NH... Canceling it to only put it back in when the moderate party favorite wins is fucked

Which I didn't think needed explained, but this thread has shown me my expectations were a lot higher than they should be

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
656 points (100.0% liked)

News

23266 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS